Concerning qualifications for unemployment insurance when an individual voluntarily leaves work.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 5064 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 5064.
You're tracking SB 5064
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 5064 — Concerning qualifications for unemployment insurance when an individual voluntarily leaves work.
Last action — On motion, referred to Labor, Commerce & Tribal Affairs.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
23 added · 23 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill SB 5064 has been revised to change the effective date for separations from July 3, 2022, to August 1, 2021. Additionally, the wording around factors affecting the labor market has been updated from "proximity to, and the separation from" to "proximity to, or the separation from" a minor child. These changes matter because they not only create an earlier deadline for separations but also clarify the language, potentially making the bill easier to understand and implement.
S-0428.2S-0199.1 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5064 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2021 Regular Session By Senate Labor, Commerce & Tribal Affairs (originally sponsored by Senators Saldaña, Wilson, C., Das, Hasegawa, Keiser, Kuderer, Lovelett, Nguyen, and Stanford)Stanford READPrefiled FIRST01/05/21. TIME 02/04/21.
Read first time 01/11/21.
Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce & Tribal Affairs.
1 SSBSB 5064 situations with respect to which the commissioner finds that the compliance with such requirements would be oppressive, or would be inconsistent with the purposes of this title;
2 SSBSB 5064 individual meets the terms and conditions of RCW 50.22.020 with respect to benefits claimed in excess of twenty-six times the individual's weekly benefit amount.
(1) With respect to ((claims that have an effective date on or after January 4, 2004, and for separations that occur before September 6, 2009)) separations that occur on or after September 6, 2009, and for separations that occur before JulyAugust 3,1, 2022:2021:
3 SSBSB 5064 (b) ((An individual)) A claimant has good cause and is not disqualified from benefits under (a) of this subsection ((when)) only under the following circumstances:
4 SSBSB 5064 (vi) The ((individual's)) claimant's usual hours were reduced by twenty-five percent or more;
(2) With respect to separations that occur on or after ((September 6, 2009)) JulyAugust 3,1, 2022:2021:
5 SSBSB 5064 (ii) The extent of direction and control by the employer over the work;
6 SSBSB 5064 (vii) The ((individual's)) claimant's worksite changed, such change caused a material increase in distance or difficulty of travel, and, after the change, the commute was greater than is customary for workers in the individual's job classification and labor market;
or (xiii) The claimant left work to relocate outside the existing labor market because of the geographical location of,of or proximity to,to orand the separation from a minor child.
7 SSBSB 5064 Sec.
8 SSBSB 5064 to make payments in lieu of contributions, based on existing records of the employment security department.
9 SSBSB 5064 be charged to the experience rating account of any contribution paying employer.
10 SSBSB 5064 (3)(a) A contribution paying base year employer, except employers as provided in subsection (5) of this section, not otherwise eligible for relief of charges for benefits under this section, may receive such relief if the benefit charges result from payment to an individual who:
11 SSBSB 5064 return of that permanent employee.
12 SSBSB 5064 department for information relating to a claim or claims without establishing good cause for the failure, if the greater of the following calculations for an employer is met:
13 SSBSB 5064
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
On motion, referred to Labor, Commerce & Tribal Affairs.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Senate Rules "X" file.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor, Commerce & Tribal Affairs at 10:30 AM
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LCTA - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Labor, Commerce & Tribal Affairs at 10:30 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor, Commerce & Tribal Affairs at 10:30 AM
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor, Commerce & Tribal Affairs at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Labor, Commerce & Tribal Affairs.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Derek Stanford · Cosponsor
- Liz Lovelett · Cosponsor
- Kuderer · Cosponsor
- Keiser · Cosponsor
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Das · Cosponsor
- Rebecca Saldaña · Primary
- Claire Wilson · Cosponsor
- Joe Nguyen · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Rebecca Saldaña Democrat
Co-sponsors (8)
- Derek Stanford Democrat
- Liz Lovelett Democrat
- Kuderer
- Keiser
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Das
- Claire Wilson Democrat
- Joe Nguyen Democrat
Not signed on (142)
142 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 142 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5064?
- SB 5064 is sponsored by Derek Stanford (Democrat), Liz Lovelett (Democrat), Kuderer, Keiser, Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Das, Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), Claire Wilson (Democrat), and Joe Nguyen (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 5064?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 5064?
- Track SB 5064 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5064
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5064
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →