Relating to: preemption of certain local animal ordinances.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 957 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 957.
You're tracking AB 957
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 957 — Relating to: preemption of certain local animal ordinances.
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Tony Evers (Democratic) on March 29, 2024.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
34 added · 74 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Assembly Bill 957 restricts local governments in Wisconsin from enforcing regulations on animal facilities located in areas zoned primarily for agriculture. Local authorities can no longer set stricter animal welfare standards or impose additional rules regarding animal care and medications unless there is a significant public health concern. This change matters because it centralizes animal regulation under state law, potentially limiting local control and standards related to animal welfare in agricultural settings.
-Date 2024of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-1343/1 JAM:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 957 January 16, 2024 - Introduced by Representatives P RONSCHINSKE , D ALLMAN , ARMSTRONG , B EHNKE , OC ONNOR , SCHMIDT and W ICHGERS , cosponsored by Senator QUINN .
ReferredAssembly toBill Committee957 onDate Localof Government.publication*:
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to create 173.90 of the statutes;
AnalysisThe bypeople of the Legislativestate Referenceof BureauWisconsin, Currentrepresented lawin specifies(c) animalUse welfareof standardsanimals. for persons responsible for confining animals, including requirements to provide such animals with sufficient food and water and standards for providing proper shelter.
CurrentLimit lawthe alsouse identifiesto andwhich prohibitsan aanimal numbersenate of crimes against animals and requiresassembly, rabiesdo vaccinationsenact andas localfollows: dog licenses and tags for dogs.
Under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) may appointbe humaneput officerswhile who may, in additionan toanimal lawfacility enforcementor officers,after investigateit andleaves enforcean theseanimal statefacility, lawsexcept as wellotherwise asprovided localin ordinancesthis relatingchap- toSECTION animals.1.
This bill prohibits political subdivisions from adopting certain regulations for animal facilities in areas that are zoned exclusively or primarily for agricultural use, unless the activity being regulated presents a substantial threat to public health or safety.
Specifically, the bill prohibits political subdivisions from establishing animal welfare standards that are more stringent than those contained in state law or from requiring or prohibiting animal medications or vaccinations that are not otherwise required or prohibited under state law.
The bill also prohibits political subdivisions from regulating the use to which an animal will be put, either on a farm or facility or after it leaves the farm or facility.
In addition, under the bill, political subdivisions may not regulate the species of animals that are allowed to be raised within an area that is zoned exclusively or primarily for agricultural use.
Under the bill, a political subdivision may not enforce any existing regulations that conflict with the - 2024 Legislature - 2 - LRB-1343/1 JAM:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 957 provisions of the bill, unless the activity being regulated presents a substantial threat to public health or safety.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
(1)ter, Ds. EFINITIONS.In this section:
944.18, chs.
174 and 951, and any rules promul- (1) D EFINITIONS.
In this section:
gated by the department.
(b)(d) “AnimalSpecies facility”of meansanimals. a farm or other commercial operation that raises or confines animals as a commercial enterprise.
Limit the species of animals (b) “Animal facility” means a farm or other commer- that may be raised or kept in an area zoned exclusively or primarily for agricultural use.
cial operation that raises or confines animals as a com- (3) E XISTING REGULATIONS.
If a political subdivision mercial enterprise.
A political subdivision may not, byhas ordinance, resolution, order, or otherwise, do any of the following to regulate an animal facility in aneffect areaon that is zoned exclusively or primarily for agricultural use, unless the activityeffective affecteddate byof thethis ordinance,subsection resolution,.... or order presents a substantial threat to public health or safety or unless otherwise specifically authorized:
(a)by Animalordinance, welfareresolution, standards.order, or otherwise, do any of [LRB inserts date], an ordinance, resolution, or order that the following to regulate an animal facility in an area that conflicts with sub.
Establish(2), animalthe welfareordinance, standardsresolution, thator areorder moreis stringentzoned thatexclusively thoseor inprimarily ss.for agricultural use, does not apply and may not be enforced, unless the activ- unless the activity affected by the ordinance, resolution, ity affected by the ordinance, resolution, or order presents a substantial threat to public health or safety.
951.13or andorder 951.14presents ora insubstantial anythreat rulesto promulgatedpublic byhealth theor department.safety or unless otherwise specifically authorized:
(b) Medications and vaccinations.
Require or prohibit any medications or vaccinations that are not required or prohibited under ch.
95 or under any rules promulgated by the department.
(c) Use of animals.
Limit the use to which an animal may be put while in an animal facility or after it leaves an animal facility, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, s.
944.18, chs.
174 and 951, and any rules promulgated by the department.
LRB-1343/1 - 2024 Legislature - 3 - JAM:cdc SECTION 1 ASSEMBLY BILL 957 (d) Species of animals.
Limit the species of animals that may be raised or kept in an area zoned exclusively or primarily for agricultural use.
(3) EXISTING REGULATIONS.
If a political subdivision has in effect on the effective date of this subsection ....
[LRB inserts date], an ordinance, resolution, or order that conflicts with sub.
(2), the ordinance, resolution, or order does not apply and may not be enforced, unless the activity affected by the ordinance, resolution, or order presents a substantial threat to public health or safety.
Nothing in this section shall be construed(a) asAnimal limitingwelfare astandards. political subdivision's authority to enforce the provisions of this chapter, s.
Show all 53 changed lines (13 more)
59.69,Establish oranimal ch.wel- construed as limiting a political subdivision’s authority fare standards that are more stringent that those in ss.
174to use its zoning authority or power or to enforce the pro- 951.13 and 951.14 or in any provisionsrules underpromulgated stateby lawthe relatingvisions toof animalthis feedingchapter, operations.s.
SECTION59.69, 2.Effective60.61, date.60.62, 61.35, or department.
(1)62.23, Thisor actch. takes effect on the 90th day after publication.
(END)174 or any provisions under state law relat- ing to livestock facilities.
(b) Medications and vaccinations.
Require or pro- hibit any medications or vaccinations that are not SECTION 2.Effective date.
required or prohibited under ch.
95 or under any rules (1) This act takes effect on the 90th day after publica- promulgated by the department.
tion.
* Section 991.11,ISCONSINSTATUTE:
Effective date of acts.
“Every act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.”
Show all 53 changed rows (13 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 1 pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 2 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-14-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-29-2024
-
Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2024
-
Report correctly enrolled on 3-14-2024
-
Received from Senate concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 3-12-2024 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Available for scheduling
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Made a special order of business at 10:45 AM on 2-22-2024 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 8, Noes 4
-
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 12, Noes 0
-
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 12, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 1)
-
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Pronschinske
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Pronschinske
-
Representative Behnke withdrawn as a coauthor
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Local Government
-
Introduced by Representatives Pronschinske, Dallman, Armstrong, Behnke, O'Connor, Schmidt and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senator Quinn
Sponsors
- Treig Pronschinske · Primary
- Alex Dallman · Primary
- David Armstrong · Primary
- Elijah Behnke · Primary
- Jerry O'Connor · Primary
- Schmidt · Primary
- Chuck Wichgers · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 125 not signed on
Sponsors (7)
- Pronschinske, Treig Republican
- Dallman, Alex Republican
- Armstrong, David Republican
- Behnke, Elijah Republican
- O'Connor, Jerry Republican
- Schmidt
- Wichgers, Chuck Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (125)
125 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 125 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 957?
- AB 957 is sponsored by Pronschinske, Treig (Republican), Dallman, Alex (Republican), Armstrong, David (Republican), Behnke, Elijah (Republican), O'Connor, Jerry (Republican), Schmidt, and Wichgers, Chuck (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 957?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 957?
- Track AB 957 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 957
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 957
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →