Relating to: modifications to building program project budgets, selection of project architects and enginee...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 932 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 932.
You're tracking SB 932
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 932 — Relating to: modifications to building program project budgets, selection of project architects and engineers, single prime contracting, agency cooperation with energy conservation contractors, timeline for claims before the Claims Board, and making a transfer to the state building trust fund. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Tony Evers (Democratic) on March 29, 2024.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
97 added · 244 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to Senate Bill 932 introduce several important changes regarding state building projects, such as tightening budget control and establishing clearer timelines for claims. One key change is that the Building Commission can now only increase a project's budget by 10% without needing additional approval from the Joint Committee on Finance. This matters because it aims to promote stricter financial oversight and accountability for public construction projects, ensuring that taxpayer funds are managed more effectively. Additionally, the bill establishes a six-month timeline for claims related to transportation contracts, which helps to expedite the resolution of any disputes.
-Date 2024of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-5573/1 MPG/MIM/JPC:cjs&emw SENATE BILL 932 January 19, 2024 - Introduced by Senator B ALLWEG , cosponsored by Representatives BORN, A RMSTRONG, D ONOVAN, G UNDRUM, H URD, K RUG, M URPHY, MURSAU , N EDWESKI, N OVAK, O C ONNOR, PLUMER, SCHMIDT, S WEARINGENand W ITTK.
ReferredSenate toBill Committee932 onDate Governmentof Operations.publication*:
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to renumber and amend 775.01;
AnalysisThe bypeople theof Legislative Reference Bureau M ODIFICATIONS TO BUILDING PROGRAM PROJECT BUDGETS Under current law, the Buildingstate Commissionof hasWisconsin, therepresented authority to authorize limited changes in theSECTION program3. or budget of a building program project if the commission determines that unanticipated program conditions or bidding conditions require the change to effectively and economically construct the project.
Under16.007 this(2m) bill, the commission may not increase the budget of a project enumerated in the statestatutes buildingis programcreated byto moresenate thanand 10assembly, percentdo withoutenact submittingas thefollows: proposed project budget increase for approval by the Joint Committee on Finance under passive review.
Theread: bill also requires that the Department of Administration submit a quarterly report to JCF and each voting member of the Building Commission that - 2024 Legislature - 2 - LRB-5573/1 MPG/MIM/JPC:cjs&emw SENATE BILL 932 identifies each project for which the Building Commission has approved a budget increase and identifies each project enumerated in the state building program for which DOA estimates a budget increase will be necessary for project completion, including a description of the reasons for the project budget shortfall.
SSECTION ELECTION1. OF PROJECT ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS Under current law, the secretary of administration is required to establish a committee for each construction project under DOA's supervision, except certain emergency projects, for the purpose of selecting an architect or engineer for the project.
If13.48 the(4) estimated cost of athe constructionstatutes project is $7,400,000amended or more, the selection committee must use a request-for-proposal process established by DOA to select16.007 an(2m) architectT orIMELINE engineerFOR forCERTAIN theCLAIMS project. based on qualifications.
TheAny billclaim raisesreferred to the board that thresholdrelates to $15,000,000.a contract with read:
Additionally,13.48(4) theS billTATE prohibitsAGENCIES suchTO aREPORT committeePROPOSED fromPROJ refusing- tothe selectdepartment anof architecttransportation or engineer who operates an architect or engineering firm with only one responsible architect or engineer for atransportation constructioninfra- projectECTS. that has an estimated cost of less than $2,000,000.
TheWhenever billany alsostate allowsagency DOAcontemplates a project structure improvement or to increasea thiscontract thresholdwith upthe depart- under the state building program it shall report the project ment of administration or the Board of Regents of the to $15,000,000.the building commission.
S INGLE PRIME CONTRACTING The billreport createsshall abe newmade exceptionon toUniversity singleof primeWisconsin contractingSystem forthat high-dollaris buildingawarded projects.under s.
Singlesuch primedate contractingand isin asuch processmanner inas which the statebuilding contractscommission only16.855 withshall abe generalheard primeby contractorthe whoclaims thenboard mustand contractthe withclaims subcontractors.prescribes.
UnderEach currentstate law,agency wheneversubmitting thea Buildingreport Commissionto determinesthe thatboard theshall usemake ofa innovativefinal typesdetermination ofupon designthe andclaim constructionbuilding processescommission willunder makethis bettersubsection useshall ofat the resourceswithin and6 technologymonths availablefrom in the buildingdate industry,that the commissionclaim maywas waivereferred certainsame requirementstime relatedsubmit to single prime contracting, if the actionreport isto in the bestjoint interestcommittee ofon theto state and is approved by the commission.claims board.
Underfinance. the bill, for any project costing $200,000,000 or more, at the request of the agency for which the project is constructed, the Building Commission is required to waive certain single prime contracting requirements for the project, as requested by the agency.
CThis ERTAINsubsection PROJECTdoes BIDDINGnot PROCEDURESapply Under the bill, at any time more than two days prior to theprojects endiden- ofSECTION the4. period during which bids may be submitted for a building project, a bidder or potential bidder may submit a question to DOA concerning the project.
Additionally,16.40 the(20b) billof provides that DOA may issue addenda at any time during the biddingstatutes periodis tocreated modify or clarify the drawings and specifications for the project being bid or to extendtified thein biddingsub. period.
COOPERATION WITH ENERGY CONSERVATION CONTRACTORS Current law authorizes DOA to contract with qualified contractors for the performance of energy conservation audits at state buildings, structures, and facilities and for the performance of construction work at a state building, structure, or facility for the purpose of realizing potential savings of future energy costs identified in an energy conservation audit.
The bill requires DOA and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System to collaborate with energy service LRB-5573/1 - 2024 Legislature - 3 - MPG/MIM/JPC:cjs&emw SENATE BILL 932 companies to identify and execute pilot projects using financing provided by the companies to upgrade facilities, reduce deferred maintenance, and increase sustainability.
U TILITIES COSTS The bill provides that each state contract for construction work must state which party to the contract is responsible for paying project utility service connection charges and which party is responsible for paying for costs related to the consumption of utility services at the project site.
A CTIONS AGAINST THE STATE RELATED TO CERTAIN CONTRACT CLAIMS Under current law, the Claims Board is required to receive, investigate, and make recommendations on all claims against the state of $10 or more that are referred to the board by the Department of Administration.
The board is required to report its findings and recommendations on all claims referred to the board to the legislature.
The board may deny a claim, directly pay a claim of up to $10,000, or recommend a payment in excess of $10,000 to the legislature.
If the board concludes that a claim should be paid by the state and the board does not or may not directly pay the claim, current law requires the board to cause a bill to be drafted covering its recommendations.
A claimant may commence a lawsuit against the state upon the refusal of the legislature to pass a bill allowing a claim.
This bill creates a timeline for the board to hear and make a final determination upon certain claims related to contracts and, in addition to current law, allows claimants to bring actions against the state related to certain contract claims if certain conditions are met.
Under the bill, any claim referred to the board that relates to a contract with the Department of Transportation for transportation infrastructure improvement or that relates to a contract with DOA or the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System that is awarded under current law for construction projects must be heard by the board, and the board must make a final determination on the claim, within six months from the day that the claim was referred to the board.
If the board concludes that the facts of the claim would be more properly adjudicated in a court of law or if the board fails to make a final determination on the claim within six months from the date that the claim was referred to the board, the bill allows the claimant to commence an action against the state seeking judgment on the claim as provided under current law.
T RANSFER TO THE BUILDING TRUST FUND The bill transfers $32,000,000 from the general fund to the building trust fund in fiscal year 2023-24.
For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
- 2024 Legislature - 4 - LRB-5573/1 MPG/MIM/JPC:cjs&emw SENATE BILL 932 SECTION 1 SECTION 1.
13.48 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:
13.48 (4) STATE AGENCIES TO REPORT PROPOSED PROJECTWhenever any state agency contemplates a project under the state building program it shall report the project to the building commission.
The report shall be made on such date and in such manner as the building commission prescribes.
Each state agency submitting a report to the building commission under this subsection shall at the same time submit the report to the joint committee on finance.
This subsection does not apply to projects identified in sub.
13.48 (19) (am) of the statutes is created to read:
13.48(19)to (am)read: 1.
In16.40 this(20b) paragraph,B “agency"UILDING hasPROGRAM theCHANGES. meaning given in s.
Show all 114 changed lines (74 more)
Submit a quarterly report no later than the last day of the month fol- 13.48(19) (am)1.
In this paragraph, “agency” has the lowing the end of each calendar quarter to the joint com- meaning given in s.
mittee on finance and each voting member of the building 2.
For any project costing $200,000,000 or more, at the request of the agency for which the project is constructed,con- thecommission buildingthat commissionincludes shallall waiveof the requirementsfollowing: under s.
structed, the building commission shall waive the (a) An identification of each project for which the requirements under s.
building commission approved during the quarter a bud- 16.855 (13)(1p), (13), and (14m) (a) to (c), as requested by the agency.get increase under s.
SECTION20.924 3.(1) (d), including a descrip- agency.
16.007tion (2m) of the statutesproject isand createdthe toamount read:of the increase.
16.007(2m)* TSection IMELINE991.11,ISCONSISTATUTES: FOR CERTAIN CLAI.
AnyEffective claimdate referred to the board that relates to a contract with the department of transportationacts. for transportation infrastructure improvement or to a contract with the department of administration or the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System that is awarded under s.
16.855“Every shallact beand heardevery portion of an act enacted by the claimslegislature boardover andthe governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the claimstime boardwhen it takes effect shall maketake aeffect finalon determinationthe uponday after its date of publication.” Wisconsin Act − 2 − 2023 Senate Bill 932 (b) An identification of each project enumerated in gram, and may authorize limited changes in the claimproject withinthe 6authorized monthsstate frombuilding program for which the dateprogram, and in the project budget if the commission department estimates a budget increase will be necessary determines that unanticipated program conditions or bid- for project completion, including a description of the claimding wasconditions referredrequire the change to effectively and eco- project and the claimsreasons board.for the project budget shortfall.
SECTIONnomically 4.construct the project.
16.40However, (20b)total ofstate theSECTION statutes5. is created to read:
LRB-5573/116.855 -(3m) 2024of Legislaturethe -statutes 5is -created MPG/MIM/JPC:cjs&emwto SECTIONfunds 4for SENATEmajor BILLprojects 932under 16.40the (20b)authorized Bstate UILDINGbuild- PROGRAMread: CHANGES.
Submiting aprogram quarterlyfor reporteach noagency latershall thannot be exceeded, and 16.855 (3m) (a) In this subsection, “bidding period” the lastbuilding daycommission may not increase the budget of means the monthperiod followingbeginning on the enddate of eachfirst calendarpublica- quarterany toproject enumerated in the jointauthorized committeestate onbuilding financetion andof eachthe votingadvertisement memberfor ofproposals and ending on the buildingprogram commissionby thatmore includesthan all10 percent without providing date of thebid following:opening.
(a)notice Anof identificationthe proposed increase to the joint committee on (b) At any time more than 2 days prior to the end of eachfinance, unless the project forbudget whichincrease is funded the buildingbidding commissionperiod, approveda duringbidder theor quarterpotential bidder may sub- solely from program revenue, gifts, grants, and other mit a budgetquestion increaseto underthe s.department concerning the project receipts, or federal funds.
20.924If (1) (d), including a description of the projectcochairpersons and the amount of the increase.being bid.
(b)committee Ando identificationnot ofnotify eachthe projectbuilding enumeratedcommission inwithin the(c) authorizedThe statedepartment buildingmay programissue foraddenda whichat any time 14 working days after the departmentdate estimatesof athe budgetbuilding increasecommis- willduring bethe necessarybidding forperiod projectto completion,modify includingor aclarify descriptionthe draw- sion’s notice of the proposed project andbudget increase, the reasonsings and specifications for the project being bid or to project budget shortfall.may be increased as proposed by the extend the bidding period.
Sbuilding ECTIONcommission. 5.
16.855If, (3m)within of14 theworking statutesdays isafter createdSECTION to6. read:
16.855(3m)16.858 (a)(3m) Inof thisthe subsection,statutes “biddingis period”created meansto the period beginning on the date of first publication of the advertisementbuilding forcommission’s proposalsnotice andof ending on the datepro- ofread: bid opening.
(b)posed Atproject anybudget timeincrease, morethe thancochairpersons 2of daysthe prior16.858 to(3m) The department and the endBoard of committee notify the biddingbuilding period,commission athat bidderthe orcom- potentialRegents bidderof maythe submitUniversity of Wisconsin System shall col- mittee has scheduled a questionmeeting for the purpose of review- laborate with energy service companies to identify and ing the departmentproposed concerningproject budget increase, the project beingbud- bid.execute pilot projects under this section using financing get may be increased by more than 10 percent only upon provided by the companies to upgrade facilities, reduce approval of the committee.
(c)deferred Themaintenance, department may issue addenda at any time during the bidding period to modify or clarify the drawings and specificationsincrease forsustainability. the project being bid or to extend the bidding period.
S ECTION 6.
16.858 (3m) of the statutes is created to read:
16.858 (3m) The department and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System shall collaborate with energy service companies to identify and - 2024 Legislature - 6 - LRB-5573/1 MPG/MIM/JPC:cjs&emw SENATE BILL 932 SECTION 6 execute pilot projects under this section using financing provided by the companies to upgrade facilities, reduce deferred maintenance, and increase sustainability.
SECTION 7.
16.867 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:
16.867(2) If the estimated cost of a construction project under the department's supervision is $7,400,000 $15,000,000 or more, the selection committee appointed under sub.
(1) shall use a request-for-proposal process established by the department to select an architect or engineer for the project based on qualifications.
SECTION 8.
16.867 (3) of the statutes is created to read:
16.867 (3) A committee appointed under sub.
(1) may not refuse to select an architect or engineer for a construction project that has an estimated cost of less than $2,000,000 because the architect or engineer operates an architect or engineering firm with only one responsible architect or engineer.
The department may increase the threshold under this subsection as necessary, but may not exceed $15,000,000.
SECTION 9.
16.899 of the statutes is created to read:
16.899 Utilities-related costs.
Each contract for construction work under this subchapter shall state which party to the contract is responsible for paying project utility service connection charges and which party is responsible for paying for costs related to the consumption of utility services at the project site.
SECTION 10.
20.924 (1) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
20.924 (1) (d) Shall exercise considered judgment in supervising the implementation of the state building program, and may authorize limited changes in the project program, and in the project budget if the commission determines that unanticipated program conditions or bidding conditions require the change to effectively and economically construct the project.
However, total state funds for major projects under the authorized state building program for each agency shall not LRB-5573/1 - 2024 Legislature - 7 - MPG/MIM/JPC:cjs&emw S ECTION 10 SENATE BILL 932 be exceeded, and the building commission may not increase the budget of any project enumerated in the authorized state building program by more than 10 percent without providing notice of the proposed increase to the joint committee on finance.
If the cochairpersons of the committee do not notify the building commission within 14 working days after the date of the building commission's notice of the proposed project budget increase, the project budget may be increased as proposed by the building commission.
If, within 14 working days after the date of the building commission's notice of the proposed project budget increase, the cochairpersons of the committee notify the building commission that the committee has scheduled a meeting for the purpose of reviewing the proposed project budget increase, the project budget may be increased by more than 10 percent only upon approval of the committee.
775.01 of the statutes is renumbered 775.01SECTION (1)7. and amended to read:
16.867 (2) of the statutes is amended to 775.01 (1) UponSubjectand amended to sub.read:
(2),read: upon the refusal of the legislature to allow a claim against the state the claimant may commence an action against the state by service as provided in s.
801.11775.01(1) (3)Upon andSubject by filing with the clerk of court a bond, not exceeding $1,000, with 2 or more sureties, to besub. approved by the attorney general, to the effect that the claimant will indemnify the state against all costs that may accrue in such action and pay to the clerk of court all costs, in case the claimant fails to obtain judgment against the state.
SECTION(2), 12.upon the refusal 16.867 (2) If the estimated cost of a construction of the legislature to allow a claim against the state the project under the department’s supervision is $7,400,000 claimant may commence an action against the state by $15,000,000 or more, the selection committee appointed service as provided in s.
775.01801.11 (2)(3) ofand theby statutesfiling iswith createdthe tounder read:sub.
775.01(1) (2)shall Uponuse thea conclusionrequest−for−proposal process clerk of court a bond, not exceeding $1,000, with 2 or established by the claimsdepartment boardto thatselect an architect or more sureties, to be approved by the factsattorney ofgeneral, ato claimengineer describedfor underthe s.project based on qualifications.
16.007 (2m) would be more properly adjudicated in a court of law or upon the failureeffect ofthat the claimsclaimant boardwill toindemnify makethe astate finalSECTION determination8. on a claim - 2024 Legislature - 8 - LRB-5573/1 MPG/MIM/JPC:cjs&emw SENATE BILL 932 S ECTION 12 described under s.
16.00716.867 (2m)(3) withinof 6 months from the datestatutes thatis thecreated claim was referred to theagainst claimsall boardcosts thethat claimant may commenceaccrue anin such action againstand thepay stateread: seeking judgment on the claim by service as provided in s.
801.11 (3) and by filing with the clerk of court a bond, not exceeding $1,000, with 2 or more sureties, to be approved by the attorney general, to the effect that the claimant will indemnify the state against all costs that may accrue in such action and pay to the clerk of court all costs, in case the claimant fails to obtain16.867 judgment(3) againstA thecommittee state.appointed under sub.
S(1) ECTIONobtain 13.Fiscaljudgment changes.against the state.
(1)may TRANSFERnot FROMrefuse THE GENERAL FUND TO THE STATE BUILDING TRUST FUNThere is transferred from the general fund to theselect statean buildingarchitect trustor fundengineer $32,000,000for ina fiscalcon- yearSECTION 2023-24.12.
(END)775.01 (2) of the statutes is created to struction project that has an estimated cost of less than read:
$2,000,000 because the architect or engineer operates an 775.01 (2) Upon the conclusion of the claims board architect or engineering firm with only one responsible that the facts of a claim described under s.
16.007 (2m) architect or engineer.
The department may increase the would be more properly adjudicated in a court of law or threshold under this subsection as necessary, but may not upon the failure of the claims board to make a final deter- exceed $15,000,000.
mination on a claim described under s.
16.007 (2m) SECTION 9.
16.899 of the statutes is created to read:
within 6 months from the date that the claim was referred 16.899 Utilities−related costs.
Each contract for to the claims board the claimant may commence an construction work under this subchapter shall state which action against the state seeking judgment on the claim by party to the contract is responsible for paying project util- service as provided in s.
801.11 (3) and by filing with the ity service connection charges and which party is respon- clerk of court a bond, not exceeding $1,000, with 2 or sible for paying for costs related to the consumption of more sureties, to be approved by the attorney general, to utility services at the project site.
the effect that the claimant will indemnify the state SECTION 10.
20.924 (1) (d) of the statutes is amended against all costs that may accrue in such action and pay to read:
to the clerk of court all costs, in case the claimant fails to 20.924(1) (d) Shall exercise considered judgment in obtain judgment against the state.
supervising the implementation of the state building pro- SECTION 13.
Fiscal changes.
Senate Bill 932 − 3 − 2023 Wisconsin Act (1) T RANSFER FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE STATE eral fund to the state building trust fund $32,000,000 in BUILDING TRUST FUND.
There is transferred from the gen- fiscal year 2023−24.
Show all 114 changed rows (74 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-15-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Received from Senate passed notwithstanding the objections of the Governor
-
Messaged
-
Passed notwithstanding the objections of the Governor, Ayes 21, Noes 10
-
Move to call the question, Ayes 22, Noes 9
-
Rules suspended and taken up
-
Placed on calendar 5-14-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-29-2024
-
Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2024
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Made a special order of business at 11:34 AM on 2-22-2024 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 2-13-2024 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3
-
Executive action taken
-
Withdrawn from committee on Senate Organization and rereferred to joint committee on Finance pursuant to Senate Rule 46(2)(c)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1
-
Executive action taken
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Public hearing held
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Ballweg
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations
-
Introduced by Senator Ballweg; cosponsored by Representatives Born, Armstrong, Donovan, Gundrum, Hurd, Krug, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, Novak, O'Connor, Plumer, Schmidt, Swearingen and Wittke
Sponsors
- Ballweg · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 131 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Ballweg
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (131)
131 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 131 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 22 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 28% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (32)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALLWEG | — | Yea |
| STROEBEL | — | Yea |
| COWLES | — | Yea |
| AGARD | — | Nay |
| JOHNSON | — | Nay |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Nay |
| Hesselbein, Dianne | Democrat | Nay |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Nay |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Nay |
| Spreitzer, Mark | Democrat | Nay |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Cabral-Guevara, Rachael | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Hutton, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| James, Jesse | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Quinn, Romaine | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Tomczyk, Cory | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 31% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (32)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALLWEG | — | Yea |
| STROEBEL | — | Yea |
| COWLES | — | Yea |
| AGARD | — | Nay |
| JOHNSON | — | Nay |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Nay |
| Hesselbein, Dianne | Democrat | Nay |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Nay |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Nay |
| Spreitzer, Mark | Democrat | Nay |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Cabral-Guevara, Rachael | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Hutton, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| James, Jesse | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Nay |
| Quinn, Romaine | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Tomczyk, Cory | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 932?
- SB 932 is sponsored by Ballweg.
- What is the current status of SB 932?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 932?
- Track SB 932 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 932
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 932
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →