HB 1241 — Planning under the growth management act.
Last action — Effective date 6/9/2022.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 18, 2021. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
533 added · 1113 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of House Bill 1241, the amendments primarily focus on modifying sections regarding the review of comprehensive land use plans and development regulations for counties and cities in Washington. Specifically, the lines that refer to critical areas and natural resource lands were simplified, removing references to additional sections of the law that were previously included. This change streamlines the bill, making it more straightforward for local governments to understand their responsibilities regarding land use planning and ensures they regularly evaluate and update their policies to meet state requirements. This matters because it can help local authorities manage their land use more effectively, addressing critical environmental issues and community needs.
ENGROSSEDH-0261.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1241 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2021 Regular Session By House Local Government (originally sponsored by Representatives Duerr, Berg, Ortiz-Self, Bateman, Wicks, Macri, Harris-Talley, and Pollet)Pollet READRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/15/21.01/18/21.
Referred to Committee on Local Government.
amending RCW 90.58.080,90.58.080 90.58.080, 36.70A.040, 36.70A.080, 36.70A.106, 36.70A.110, 36.70A.190, and 36.70A.210;90.58.080;
(b) Except as otherwise provided, a county or city not planning under RCW 36.70A.040 shall take action to review and, if needed, revise its policies and development regulations regarding critical areas and natural resource lands adopted according to this chapter to ensure these policies and regulations comply with the requirements of this chapter according to the deadlines in subsections (4) and (5) of p.
1 ESHBHB 1241 this chapter according to the deadlines in subsections (4) and (5) of this section.
p.(iv) The amendment of the capital facilities element of a comprehensive plan that occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a county or city budget;
2 ESHB 1241 (iv) The amendment of the capital facilities element of a comprehensive plan that occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendmentp. of a county or city budget;
or2 HB 1241 (v) The adoption of comprehensive plan amendments necessary to enact a planned action under RCW 43.21C.440, provided that amendments are considered in accordance with the public participation program established by the county or city under this subsection (2)(a) and all persons who have requested notice of a comprehensive plan update are given notice of the amendments and an opportunity to comment.
(a) On or before June 30, 2015, for King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties and the cities within those counties;
3 ESHBHB 1241 (a)(b) On or before June 30, 2015,2016, for King,Clallam, Pierce,Clark, Island, Jefferson, Kitsap, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, Thurston, and SnohomishWhatcom counties and the cities within those counties;
(b) On or before June 30, 2016, for Clallam, Clark, Island, Jefferson, Kitsap, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, Thurston, and Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties;
(5)(5)(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (6) and (8) of this section, following the review of comprehensive plans and development regulations required by subsection (4) of this section, counties and cities shall take action to review and, if needed, revise their comprehensive plans and development regulations to ensure the plan and regulations comply with the requirements of this chapter as follows:
(a)(((a))) (i) On or before June 30, 2024, and every ((eight)) ten years thereafter, for King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties and the cities within those counties;
(b)(((b))) (ii) On or before June 30, 2025, and every ((eight)) ten years thereafter, for Clallam, Clark, Island, Jefferson, Lewis, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, Thurston, and Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties;
(c)(((c))) (iii) On or before June 30, 2026, and every ((eight)) ten years thereafter, for Benton, Chelan, Cowlitz, Douglas, Franklin, Kittitas, Skamania, Spokane, Walla Walla, and Yakima counties and the cities within those counties;
and (d)(((d))) (iv) On or before June 30, 2027, and every ((eight)) ten years thereafter, for Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Wahkiakum, and Whitman counties and the cities within those counties.
(b) By no later than December 31st of the year following adoption of a comprehensive plan after January 1, 2024, and annually thereafter, each county and city planning under RCW 36.70A.040 with a population of 7,500 or more shall create an annual work program for implementing its comprehensive plan.
The work program shall describe the development regulations and nonregulatory measures, including actions for acquiring and spending money in support of the work p.
4 HB 1241 program, which are to be considered in the upcoming year, as well as those measures and actions which were considered and acted upon in the current year-to-date.
Counties and cities may begin this process early and may be eligible p.for grants from the department, subject to available funding, if they elect to do so.
4(b) ESHBA 1241county forthat grantsis fromsubject to a deadline established in subsection (5)(a)(((ii) through (iv) [(b) through (d)])) of this section and meets the department,following subjectcriteria tomay availablecomply funding,with ifthe theyrequirements electof tothis dosection so.at any time within the twenty-four months following the deadline established in subsection (5) of this section:
(b) A county that is subject to a deadline established in subsection (5)(((a)(ii) through (iv) [(b) through (d)])) of this section and meets the following criteria may comply with the requirements of this section at any time within the twenty-four months following the deadline established in subsection (5) of this section:
(c) A city that is subject to a deadline established in subsection (5)(((a)(ii)(5)(a)(((ii) through (iv) [(b) through (d)])) of this section and meets the following criteria may comply with the requirements of this section at any time within the twenty-four months following the deadline established in subsection (5) of this section:
(b) A county or city that is fewer than twelve months out of compliance with the schedules in this section for development regulations that protect critical areas is making substantial progress towards compliance.
Only those counties and cities in compliance with the schedules in this section may receive preference for grants or loans subject to the provisions of RCW 43.17.250.
5 ESHBHB 1241 (8)(a)(b) ExceptA ascounty otherwiseor providedcity inthat (c) of this subsection, if a participating watershed is achievingfewer benchmarksthan andtwelve goalsmonths forout the protection of criticalcompliance areaswith functions and values, the countyschedules isin notthis requiredsection tofor update development regulations tothat protect critical areas asis theymaking specificallysubstantial applyprogress totowards agriculturalcompliance. activities in that watershed.
Only those counties and cities in compliance with the schedules in this section may receive preference for grants or loans subject to the provisions of RCW 43.17.250.
(8)(a) Except as otherwise provided in (c) of this subsection, if a participating watershed is achieving benchmarks and goals for the protection of critical areas functions and values, the county is not required to update development regulations to protect critical areas as they specifically apply to agricultural activities in that watershed.
(9)(a) Counties subject to planning deadlines established in subsection (5)(5)(a) of this section that are required or that choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 and that(b) meet either criteria of (a)(i) or (ii) of this subsection,section, and cities with a population of more than 6,000 as of January 1, 2021, within those counties, must provide to the department an implementation progress reportp. detailing the progress they have achieved in implementing their comprehensive plan five years after the review and revision of their comprehensive plan.
Once6 aHB county1241 meetsreport detailing the criteriaprogress they have achieved in subsectionimplementing (a)(i)their orcomprehensive (ii)plan five years after the review and revision of thistheir p.comprehensive plan.
6(b) ESHBThe 1241department subsection,shall theadopt implementationrules progressfor reportindicators, requirementsmeasures, remainmilestones, inand effectcriteria thereafter for thatuse countyby counties and the cities thereinin with populations greater than 6,000 as of January 1, 2021, even if the countyimplementation laterprogress noreport. longer meets either or both criteria.
AAt countya isminimum, subjectthese toindicators, themeasures, implementationmilestones, progressand report requirement if it meets either of the following criteria onmust orcover: after January 1, 2021:
(i) TheHousing countyaffordability has a population density of at least 100 people per square mile and aavailability populationwithin ofthe atjurisdiction; least 200,000;
or (ii) The county has a population density of at least 75 people per square mile and an annual growth rate of at least 1.75 percent as determined by the office of financial management.
(b) The department shall adopt guidelines for indicators, measures, milestones, and criteria for use by counties and cities in the implementation progress report that must cover:
(i) The implementation of previously adopted changes to the housing element and any effect those changes have had on housing affordability and availability within the jurisdiction;
and (iii) ProgressThe towardprotection implementingof anycritical actionsareas required to achieve reductions to meet greenhouse gas and vehiclethe milesuse traveled requirements as provided for in any element of thebest comprehensiveavailable planscience; under RCW 36.70A.070.
(c)(iv) IfThe ajurisdiction's cityresponse or county required to providenew anstatutory implementation progress report under this subsection (9) has not implemented any specifically identified regulations, zoning and land use changes, or taken other legislative or administrative action necessary to implement any changes inadopted since the mostprevious recent periodic update in their comprehensive plan byupdate; the due date for the implementation progress report, the city or county must identify the need for such action in the implementation progress report.
Cities and counties(v) mustAchieving adoptany arequired workreductions plan to implementmeet anygreenhouse necessarygas regulations,reduction zoning and landvehicle usemiles changes,traveled orrequirements. take other legislative or administrative action identified in the implementation progress report and complete all work necessary for implementation within two years of submission of the implementation progress report.
(c) Counties and cities subject to the review and evaluation program requirements in RCW 36.70A.215 must include in the implementation progress report an identification of inconsistencies found during the review and evaluation between what has occurred since the adoption of the countywide planning policies and the county and city comprehensive plans and development regulations and what was envisioned in those policies and plans and the planning goals and the requirements of this chapter.
Show all 263 changed lines (223 more)
(d) If a city or county has not implemented statutory changes adopted since the most recent periodic update in their comprehensive plan or development regulations by the due date for the implementation progress report, the city or county must identify the need for such changes in the implementation progress report, and must include necessary changes in the implementation work program required under this section.
Cities and counties must then adopt any necessary changes within two years of submission for the implementation progress report.
(1) Local governments shall develop or amend a master program for regulation of uses of the shorelines of the state consistent with the p.required elements of the guidelines adopted by the department in accordance with the schedule established by this section.
7p. ESHB 1241 required elements of the guidelines adopted by the department in accordance with the schedule established by this section.
7 HB 1241 (2)(a) Subject to the provisions of subsections (5) and (6) of this section, each local government subject to this chapter shall develop or amend its master program for the regulation of uses of shorelines within its jurisdiction according to the following schedule:
Any jurisdiction listed in subsection (2)(a)(i) of this section that has a new or amended master program approved by the department on or after March 1, 2002, but before July 27, 2003, shall not be required to complete master program amendments p.until the applicable date provided by subsection (4)(b) of this section.
8p. ESHB 1241 until the applicable date provided by subsection (4)(b) of this section.
8 HB 1241 (b) Following approval by the department of a new or amended master program, local governments choosing to develop or amend master programs on or before December 1, 2009, shall be deemed to have complied with the schedule established by subsection (2)(a)(iii) through (vi) of this section and shall not be required to complete master program amendments until the applicable dates established by subsection (4)(b) of this section.
(5) In meeting the update requirements of subsection (2) of this section, local governments are encouraged to begin the process of p.
9 ESHBHB 1241 (5) In meeting the update requirements of subsection (2) of this section, local governments are encouraged to begin the process of developing or amending their master programs early and are eligible for grants from the department as provided by RCW 90.58.250, subject to available funding.
(8) In meeting the update requirements of subsection (2) of this section, local governments may be provided an additional year beyond p.
10 ESHBHB 1241 (8) In meeting the update requirements of subsection (2) of this section, local governments may be provided an additional year beyond the deadlines in this section to complete their master program or amendment.
(3)(a) Following approval by the department of a new or amended master program, local governments required to develop or amend master p.
11 ESHBHB 1241 (3)(a) Following approval by the department of a new or amended master program, local governments required to develop or amend master programs on or before December 1, 2009, as provided by subsection (2)(a)(i) and (ii) of this section, shall be deemed to have complied with the schedule established by subsection (2)(a)(iii) of this section and shall not be required to complete master program amendments until the applicable dates established by subsection (4)(b) of this section.
(ii) On or before June 30, ((2029)) 2030, and every ((eight)) ten years thereafter, for Clallam, Clark, Island, Jefferson, Lewis, p.Mason, San Juan, Skagit, Thurston, and Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties;
12p. ESHB 1241 Mason, San Juan, Skagit, Thurston, and Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties;
12 HB 1241 (iii) On or before June 30, ((2030)) 2031, and every ((eight)) ten years thereafter, for Benton, Chelan, Cowlitz, Douglas, Franklin, Kittitas, Skamania, Spokane, Walla Walla, and Yakima counties and the cities within those counties;
(b) Local governments with delayed compliance dates as provided in (a) of this subsection shall be the first priority for funding in subsequent biennia, and the periodic review compliance deadline for p.those local governments shall be two years after the date of grant approval.
13p. ESHB 1241 those local governments shall be two years after the date of grant approval.
13 HB 1241 (c) Failure of the local government to apply in a timely manner for a master program development or amendment grant in accordance with the requirements of the department shall not be considered a delay resulting from the provisions of (a) of this subsection.
NEW SECTION.
RCWSection 36.70A.0402 andof 2014this cact 147expires sJuly 11, are2025. each amended to read as follows:
(1) Each county that has both a population of fifty thousand or more and, until May 16, 1995, has had its population increase by more than ten percent in the previous ten years or, on or after May 16, 1995, has had its population increase by more than seventeen percent in the previous ten years, and the cities located within such county, and any other county regardless of its population that has had its population increase by more than twenty percent in the previous ten years, and the cities located within such county, shall conform with all of the requirements of this chapter.
However, the county legislative authority of such a county with a population of less than fifty thousand population may adopt a resolution removing the county, and the cities located within the county, from the requirements of adopting comprehensive land use plans and development regulations under this chapter if this resolution is adopted and filed with the department by December 31, 1990, for counties initially meeting this set of criteria, or within sixty days of the date the office of financial management certifies that a county meets this set of criteria under subsection (5) of this section.
For the purposes of this subsection, a county not currently planning under this chapter p.
14 ESHB 1241 is not required to include in its population count those persons confined in a correctional facility under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections that is located in the county.
Once a county meets either of these sets of criteria, the requirement to conform with all of the requirements of this chapter remains in effect, even if the county no longer meets one of these sets of criteria.
(2)(a) The county legislative authority of any county that does not meet either of the sets of criteria established under subsection (1) of this section may adopt a resolution indicating its intention to have subsection (1) of this section apply to the county.
Each city, located in a county that chooses to plan under this subsection, shall conform with all of the requirements of this chapter.
Once such a resolution has been adopted, the county and the cities located within the county remain subject to all of the requirements of this chapter, unless the county subsequently adopts a withdrawal resolution for partial planning pursuant to (b)(i) of this subsection.
(b)(i) Until December 31, 2015, the legislative authority of a county may adopt a resolution removing the county and the cities located within the county from the requirements to plan under this section if:
(A) The county has a population, as estimated by the office of financial management, of twenty thousand or fewer inhabitants at any time between April 1, 2010, and April 1, 2015;
(B) The county has previously adopted a resolution indicating its intention to have subsection (1) of this section apply to the county;
(C) At least sixty days prior to adopting a resolution for partial planning, the county provides written notification to the legislative body of each city within the county of its intent to consider adopting the resolution;
and (D) The legislative bodies of at least sixty percent of those cities having an aggregate population of at least seventy-five percent of the incorporated county population have not:
Adopted resolutions opposing the action by the county;
and provided written notification of the resolutions to the county.
(ii) Upon adoption of a resolution for partial planning under (b)(i) of this subsection:
p.
15 ESHB 1241 (A) The county and the cities within the county are, except as provided otherwise, no longer obligated to plan under this section;
and (B) The county may not, for a minimum of ten years from the date of adoption of the resolution, adopt another resolution indicating its intention to have subsection (1) of this section apply to the county.
(c) The adoption of a resolution for partial planning under (b)(i) of this subsection does not nullify or otherwise modify the requirements for counties and cities established in RCW 36.70A.060, 36.70A.070(5) and associated development regulations, 36.70A.170, and 36.70A.172.
(3) Any county or city that is initially required to conform with all of the requirements of this chapter under subsection (1) of this section shall take actions under this chapter as follows:
(a) The county legislative authority shall adopt a countywide planning policy under RCW 36.70A.210;
(b) the county and each city located within the county shall designate critical areas, agricultural lands, forestlands, and mineral resource lands, and adopt development regulations conserving these designated agricultural lands, forestlands, and mineral resource lands and protecting these designated critical areas, under RCW 36.70A.170 and 36.70A.060;
(c) the county shall designate and take other actions related to urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110;
(([and])) and (d) if the county has a population of fifty thousand or more, the county and each city located within the county shall adopt a comprehensive plan under this chapter and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan on or before July 1, 1994, and if the county has a population of less than fifty thousand, the county and each city located within the county shall adopt a comprehensive plan under this chapter and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan by January 1, 1995, but if the governor makes written findings that a county with a population of less than fifty thousand or a city located within such a county is not making reasonable progress toward adopting a comprehensive plan and development regulations the governor may reduce this deadline for such actions to be taken by no more than one hundred eighty days.
Any county or city subject to this subsection may obtain an additional six months before it is required to have adopted its development regulations by submitting a letter notifying p.
16 ESHB 1241 the department of its need prior to the deadline for adopting both a comprehensive plan and development regulations.
(4) Any county or city that is required to conform with all the requirements of this chapter, as a result of the county legislative authority adopting its resolution of intention under subsection (2) of this section, shall take actions under this chapter as follows:
(a) The county legislative authority shall adopt a countywide planning policy under RCW 36.70A.210;
(b) the county and each city that is located within the county shall adopt development regulations conserving agricultural lands, forestlands, and mineral resource lands it designated under RCW 36.70A.060 within one year of the date the county legislative authority adopts its resolution of intention;
(c) the county shall designate and take other actions related to urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110;
and (d) the county and each city that is located within the county shall adopt a comprehensive plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan not later than four years from the date the county legislative authority adopts its resolution of intention, but a county or city may obtain an additional six months before it is required to have adopted its development regulations by submitting a letter notifying the department of its need prior to the deadline for adopting both a comprehensive plan and development regulations.
(5) If the office of financial management certifies that the population of a county that previously had not been required to plan under subsection (1) or (2) of this section has changed sufficiently to meet either of the sets of criteria specified under subsection (1) of this section, and where applicable, the county legislative authority has not adopted a resolution removing the county from these requirements as provided in subsection (1) of this section, the county and each city within such county shall take actions under this chapter as follows:
(a) The county legislative authority shall adopt a countywide planning policy under RCW 36.70A.210;
(b) the county and each city located within the county shall adopt development regulations under RCW 36.70A.060 conserving agricultural lands, forestlands, and mineral resource lands it designated within one year of the certification by the office of financial management;
(c) the county shall designate and take other actions related to urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110;
and (d) the county and each city located within the county shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and p.
17 ESHB 1241 development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan within four years of the certification by the office of financial management, but a county or city may obtain an additional six months before it is required to have adopted its development regulations by submitting a letter notifying the department of its need prior to the deadline for adopting both a comprehensive plan and development regulations.
(6) A copy of each document that is required under this section shall be submitted to the department at the time of its adoption.
(7) Cities and counties planning under this chapter must amend the transportation element of the comprehensive plan to be in compliance with this chapter and chapter 47.80 RCW no later than December 31, 2000.
(8) A federally recognized Indian tribe may voluntarily choose to participate in the county or regional planning process and coordinate with the county and cities that are either required to comply with the provisions of this chapter pursuant to subsection (1) of this section or voluntarily choose to comply with the provisions of this chapter pursuant to subsection (2) of this section;
provided, that collaboration and participation is a nonexclusive exercise of coordination and cooperation in the planning process and failure to exercise discretionary collaboration and participation shall not limit a party's standing for quasi-judicial or judicial review or appeal under this chapter.
(a) Upon receipt of notice in the form of a tribal resolution from a tribe whose reservation or ceded lands lie within the county, which indicates the tribe has a planning process or intends to initiate a parallel planning process, the county, cities and other local governments conducting the planning under this chapter shall enter into a memorandum of agreement with such tribes in regard to collaboration and participation in the planning process.
(b) Nothing in this subsection, any other provision in this chapter, or a tribe's decision to become a participating tribe for planning purposes, shall affect, alter, or limit in any way a tribe's authority, jurisdiction, or any treaty or other rights it may have by virtue of its status as a sovereign Indian tribe.
(c) Nothing in this subsection or any other provision in this chapter shall affect, alter, or limit in any way, subject to a memorandum of agreement adopted in accordance with (a) of this subsection, a local government legislative body's authority to adopt p.
18 ESHB 1241 and amend comprehensive land use plans and development regulations in accordance with this chapter.
Sec.
5.
RCW 36.70A.080 and 2011 c 318 s 801 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) A comprehensive plan may include additional elements, items, or studies dealing with other subjects relating to the physical development within its jurisdiction, including, but not limited to:
(a) Conservation;
(b) Solar energy;
((and)) (c) Recreation;
and (d) Container port elements.
When including container port elements, a city shall collaborate with the federally recognized Indian tribe whose reservation is located within or adjacent to the lands subject to the container port element.
(2) A comprehensive plan may include, where appropriate, subarea plans, each of which is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
(3)(a) Cities that qualify as a receiving city may adopt a comprehensive plan element and associated development regulations that apply within receiving areas under chapter 39.108 RCW.
(b) For purposes of this subsection, the terms "receiving city" and "receiving area" have the same meanings as provided in RCW 39.108.010.
Sec.
6.
RCW 36.70A.106 and 2004 c 197 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Each county and city proposing adoption of a comprehensive plan or development regulations under this chapter shall notify the department of its intent to adopt such plan or regulations at least sixty days prior to final adoption.
State agencies including the department may provide comments to the county or city on the proposed comprehensive plan, or proposed development regulations, during the public review process prior to adoption.
(2) Each county and city planning under this chapter shall transmit a complete and accurate copy of its comprehensive plan or development regulations to the department within ten days after final adoption.
(3)(a) Any amendments for permanent changes to a comprehensive plan or development regulation that are proposed by a county or city to its adopted plan or regulations shall be submitted to the p.
19 ESHB 1241 department in the same manner as initial plans and development regulations under this section.
Any amendments to a comprehensive plan or development regulations that are adopted by a county or city shall be transmitted to the department in the same manner as the initial plans and regulations under this section.
(b) Each county and city planning under this chapter may request expedited review for any amendments for permanent changes to a development regulation.
Upon receiving a request for expedited review, and after consultation with other state agencies, the department may grant expedited review if the department determines that expedited review does not compromise the state's ability to provide timely comments related to compliance with the goals and requirements of this chapter or on other matters of state interest.
Cities and counties may adopt amendments for permanent changes to a development regulation immediately following the granting of the request for expedited review by the department.
(c) A federally recognized Indian tribe may request to receive from the department copies of notices received from cities or counties under this section.
Upon receipt of a submittal from a city or county under this section, the department shall forward the submittal to any tribe that has requested notification.
Sec.
7.
RCW 36.70A.110 and 2017 c 305 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) Each county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature.
Each city that is located in such a county shall be included within an urban growth area.
An urban growth area may include more than a single city.
An urban growth area may include territory that is located outside of a city only if such territory already is characterized by urban growth whether or not the urban growth area includes a city, or is adjacent to territory already characterized by urban growth, or is a designated new fully contained community as defined by RCW 36.70A.350.
When a federally recognized Indian tribe whose reservation or ceded lands lie within the county or city has voluntarily chosen to participate in the planning process pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040, the county or city and the tribe shall coordinate their planning efforts for any areas p.
20 ESHB 1241 planned for urban growth consistent with the terms outlined in the memorandum of agreement provided for in RCW 36.70A.040(8)(a).
(2) Based upon the growth management population projection made for the county by the office of financial management, the county and each city within the county shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is projected to occur in the county or city for the succeeding twenty-year period, except for those urban growth areas contained totally within a national historical reserve.
As part of this planning process, each city within the county must include areas sufficient to accommodate the broad range of needs and uses that will accompany the projected urban growth including, as appropriate, medical, governmental, institutional, commercial, service, retail, and other nonresidential uses.
Each urban growth area shall permit urban densities and shall include greenbelt and open space areas.
In the case of urban growth areas contained totally within a national historical reserve, the city may restrict densities, intensities, and forms of urban growth as determined to be necessary and appropriate to protect the physical, cultural, or historic integrity of the reserve.
An urban growth area determination may include a reasonable land market supply factor and shall permit a range of urban densities and uses.
In determining this market factor, cities and counties may consider local circumstances.
Cities and counties have discretion in their comprehensive plans to make many choices about accommodating growth.
Within one year of July 1, 1990, each county that as of June 1, 1991, was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, shall begin consulting with each city located within its boundaries and each city shall propose the location of an urban growth area.
Within sixty days of the date the county legislative authority of a county adopts its resolution of intention or of certification by the office of financial management, all other counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall begin this consultation with each city located within its boundaries.
The county shall attempt to reach agreement with each city on the location of an urban growth area within which the city is located.
If such an agreement is not reached with each city located within the urban growth area, the county shall justify in writing why it so designated the area an urban growth area.
A city may object formally with the department over the designation of the urban growth area within which it is located.
p.
21 ESHB 1241 Where appropriate, the department shall attempt to resolve the conflicts, including the use of mediation services.
(3) Urban growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that have adequate existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, second in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served adequately by a combination of both existing public facilities and services and any additional needed public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources, and third in the remaining portions of the urban growth areas.
Urban growth may also be located in designated new fully contained communities as defined by RCW 36.70A.350.
(4) In general, cities are the units of local government most appropriate to provide urban governmental services.
In general, it is not appropriate that urban governmental services be extended to or expanded in rural areas except in those limited circumstances shown to be necessary to protect basic public health and safety and the environment and when such services are financially supportable at rural densities and do not permit urban development.
(5) On or before October 1, 1993, each county that was initially required to plan under RCW 36.70A.040(1) shall adopt development regulations designating interim urban growth areas under this chapter.
Within three years and three months of the date the county legislative authority of a county adopts its resolution of intention or of certification by the office of financial management, all other counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall adopt development regulations designating interim urban growth areas under this chapter.
Adoption of the interim urban growth areas may only occur after public notice;
public hearing;
and compliance with the state environmental policy act, chapter 43.21C RCW, and under this section.
Such action may be appealed to the growth management hearings board under RCW 36.70A.280.
Final urban growth areas shall be adopted at the time of comprehensive plan adoption under this chapter.
(6) Each county shall include designations of urban growth areas in its comprehensive plan.
(7) An urban growth area designated in accordance with this section may include within its boundaries urban service areas or potential annexation areas designated for specific cities or towns within the county.
p.
22 ESHB 1241 (8)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, the expansion of an urban growth area is prohibited into the one hundred year floodplain of any river or river segment that:
(i) Is located west of the crest of the Cascade mountains;
and (ii) has a mean annual flow of one thousand or more cubic feet per second as determined by the department of ecology.
(b) Subsection (8)(a) of this section does not apply to:
(i) Urban growth areas that are fully contained within a floodplain and lack adjacent buildable areas outside the floodplain;
(ii) Urban growth areas where expansions are precluded outside floodplains because:
(A) Urban governmental services cannot be physically provided to serve areas outside the floodplain;
or (B) Expansions outside the floodplain would require a river or estuary crossing to access the expansion;
or (iii) Urban growth area expansions where:
(A) Public facilities already exist within the floodplain and the expansion of an existing public facility is only possible on the land to be included in the urban growth area and located within the floodplain;
or (B) Urban development already exists within a floodplain as of July 26, 2009, and is adjacent to, but outside of, the urban growth area, and the expansion of the urban growth area is necessary to include such urban development within the urban growth area;
or (C) The land is owned by a jurisdiction planning under this chapter or the rights to the development of the land have been permanently extinguished, and the following criteria are met:
(I) The permissible use of the land is limited to one of the following:
Outdoor recreation;
environmentally beneficial projects, including but not limited to habitat enhancement or environmental restoration;
stormwater facilities;
flood control facilities;
or underground conveyances;
and (II) The development and use of such facilities or projects will not decrease flood storage, increase stormwater runoff, discharge pollutants to fresh or salt waters during normal operations or floods, or increase hazards to people and property.
(c) For the purposes of this subsection (8), "one hundred year floodplain" means the same as "special flood hazard area" as set forth in WAC 173-158-040 as it exists on July 26, 2009.
p.
23 ESHB 1241 (9) If a county, city, or utility has adopted a capital facility plan or utilities element to provide sewer service within the urban growth areas during the twenty-year planning period, nothing in this chapter obligates counties, cities, or utilities to install sanitary sewer systems to properties within urban growth areas designated under subsection (2) of this section by the end of the twenty-year planning period when those properties:
(a)(i) Have existing, functioning, nonpolluting on-site sewage systems;
(ii) Have a periodic inspection program by a public agency to verify the on-site sewage systems function properly and do not pollute surface or groundwater;
and (iii) Have no redevelopment capacity;
or (b) Do not require sewer service because development densities are limited due to wetlands, flood plains, fish and wildlife habitats, or geological hazards.
Sec.
8.
RCW 36.70A.190 and 1991 sp.s.
c 32 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) The department shall establish a program of technical and financial assistance and incentives to counties and cities to encourage and facilitate the adoption and implementation of comprehensive plans and development regulations throughout the state.
(2) The department shall develop a priority list and establish funding levels for planning and technical assistance grants both for counties and cities that plan under RCW 36.70A.040.
Priority for assistance shall be based on a county's or city's population growth rates, commercial and industrial development rates, the existence and quality of a comprehensive plan and development regulations, and other relevant factors.
(3) The department shall develop and administer a grant program to provide direct financial assistance to counties and cities for the preparation of comprehensive plans under this chapter.
The department may establish provisions for county and city matching funds to conduct activities under this subsection.
Grants may be expended for any purpose directly related to the preparation of a county or city comprehensive plan as the county or city and the department may agree, including, without limitation, the conducting of surveys, inventories and other data gathering and management activities, the p.
24 ESHB 1241 retention of planning consultants, contracts with regional councils for planning and related services, and other related purposes.
(4) The department shall establish a program of technical assistance:
(a) Utilizing department staff, the staff of other state agencies, and the technical resources of counties and cities to help in the development of comprehensive plans required under this chapter.
The technical assistance may include, but not be limited to, model land use ordinances, regional education and training programs, and information for local and regional inventories;
and (b) Adopting by rule procedural criteria to assist counties and cities in adopting comprehensive plans and development regulations that meet the goals and requirements of this chapter.
These criteria shall reflect regional and local variations and the diversity that exists among different counties and cities that plan under this chapter.
(5) The department shall provide mediation services to resolve disputes between counties and cities regarding, among other things, coordination of regional issues and designation of urban growth areas.
(6) A federally recognized Indian tribe may formally request the department to enter into formal government-to-government consultation with the tribe regarding the tribe's concerns that the proposed plan or any amendment to the county's or city's plan may directly or indirectly injure rights reserved to the tribe under treaties, statutes, or federal trust obligations regarding lands or activities within the reservation of such tribe or rights reserved to the tribe in regard to lands ceded under a treaty.
Upon receipt of a formal request to enter into formal government-to-government consultation from a tribe, the department shall enter into formal government-to- government consultation with the tribe for a period not to exceed 60 days.
The department shall also notify the city or county of the request and 60-day period and the county or city shall delay any final action adopting any plan or amendment during that period.
A county or city must not be penalized for noncompliance under this chapter due to any delays associated with the government-to- government consultation process.
When the government-to-government consultation process is complete, the department shall provide comments to the county or city including a summary and supporting materials regarding the tribe's concerns and an offer to assist in p.
25 ESHB 1241 providing formal mediation or dispute resolution prior to adoption of the proposed plan.
Upon receipt of such notice and comments, the county or city may either agree to amend the plan as requested consistent with the comments of the department, or enter mediation with the tribe, which shall be arranged by the department utilizing a suitable expert to be paid by the department.
(7) The department shall provide planning grants to enhance citizen participation under RCW 36.70A.140.
Sec.
9.
RCW 36.70A.210 and 2009 c 121 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
(1) The legislature recognizes that counties are regional governments within their boundaries, and cities are primary providers of urban governmental services within urban growth areas.
For the purposes of this section, a "countywide planning policy" is a written policy statement or statements used solely for establishing a countywide framework from which county and city comprehensive plans are developed and adopted pursuant to this chapter.
This framework shall ensure that city and county comprehensive plans are consistent as required in RCW 36.70A.100.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter the land-use powers of cities.
(2) The legislative authority of a county that plans under RCW 36.70A.040 shall adopt a countywide planning policy in cooperation with the cities located in whole or in part within the county as follows:
(a) No later than sixty calendar days from July 16, 1991, the legislative authority of each county that as of June 1, 1991, was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall convene a meeting with representatives of each city located within the county for the purpose of establishing a collaborative process that will provide a framework for the adoption of a countywide planning policy.
In other counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, this meeting shall be convened no later than sixty days after the date the county adopts its resolution of intention or was certified by the office of financial management.
(b) The process and framework for adoption of a countywide planning policy specified in (a) of this subsection shall determine the manner in which the county and the cities agree to all procedures and provisions including but not limited to desired planning policies, deadlines, ratification of final agreements and p.
26 ESHB 1241 demonstration thereof, and financing, if any, of all activities associated therewith.
(c) If a county fails for any reason to convene a meeting with representatives of cities as required in (a) of this subsection, the governor may immediately impose any appropriate sanction or sanctions on the county from those specified under RCW 36.70A.340.
(d) If there is no agreement by October 1, 1991, in a county that was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 as of June 1, 1991, or if there is no agreement within one hundred twenty days of the date the county adopted its resolution of intention or was certified by the office of financial management in any other county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, the governor shall first inquire of the jurisdictions as to the reason or reasons for failure to reach an agreement.
If the governor deems it appropriate, the governor may immediately request the assistance of the department of ((community, trade, and economic development)) commerce to mediate any disputes that preclude agreement.
If mediation is unsuccessful in resolving all disputes that will lead to agreement, the governor may impose appropriate sanctions from those specified under RCW 36.70A.340 on the county, city, or cities for failure to reach an agreement as provided in this section.
The governor shall specify the reason or reasons for the imposition of any sanction.
(e) No later than July 1, 1992, the legislative authority of each county that was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 as of June 1, 1991, or no later than fourteen months after the date the county adopted its resolution of intention or was certified by the office of financial management the county legislative authority of any other county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, shall adopt a countywide planning policy according to the process provided under this section and that is consistent with the agreement pursuant to (b) of this subsection, and after holding a public hearing or hearings on the proposed countywide planning policy.
(3) A countywide planning policy shall at a minimum, address the following:
(a) Policies to implement RCW 36.70A.110;
(b) Policies for promotion of contiguous and orderly development and provision of urban services to such development;
p.
27 ESHB 1241 (c) Policies for siting public capital facilities of a countywide or statewide nature, including transportation facilities of statewide significance as defined in RCW 47.06.140;
(d) Policies for countywide transportation facilities and strategies;
(e) Policies that consider the need for affordable housing, such as housing for all economic segments of the population and parameters for its distribution;
(f) Policies for joint county and city planning within urban growth areas;
(g) Policies for countywide economic development and employment, which must include consideration of the future development of commercial and industrial facilities;
and (h) An analysis of the fiscal impact.
(4) Federal agencies and federally recognized Indian tribes ((may)) whose reservation or ceded lands lie within the county shall be invited to participate in and cooperate with the countywide planning policy adoption process.
Adopted countywide planning policies shall be adhered to by state agencies.
(5) Failure to adopt a countywide planning policy that meets the requirements of this section may result in the imposition of a sanction or sanctions on a county or city within the county, as specified in RCW 36.70A.340.
In imposing a sanction or sanctions, the governor shall specify the reasons for failure to adopt a countywide planning policy in order that any imposed sanction or sanctions are fairly and equitably related to the failure to adopt a countywide planning policy.
(6) Cities and the governor may appeal an adopted countywide planning policy to the growth management hearings board within sixty days of the adoption of the countywide planning policy.
(7) Multicounty planning policies shall be adopted by two or more counties, each with a population of four hundred fifty thousand or more, with contiguous urban areas and may be adopted by other counties, according to the process established under this section or other processes agreed to among the counties and cities within the affected counties throughout the multicounty region.
10.5.
Section 2 of this act expires July 1, 2025.
p.
28 ESHB 1241 NEW SECTION.
Sec.
11.
2914 ESHBHB 1241
Show all 263 changed rows (223 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Engrossed Second Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Second Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
Effective date 6/9/2022.
-
Chapter 192, 2022 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
President signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 27; nays, 21; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing & Local Government at 10:30 AM
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
HLG - Majority; do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Housing & Local Government at 10:30 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing & Local Government at 08:00 AM
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing & Local Government at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Housing & Local Government.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 55; nays, 43; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
2nd substitute bill substituted (LG 22).
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 03:30 PM
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; do pass 2nd substitute bill proposed by Local Government.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Appropriations at 3:30 PM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 03:30 PM
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 3:30 PM.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 08:00 AM
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LG - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Local Government at 8:00 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 10:00 AM
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 10:00 AM.
-
Referred to Local Government.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration.
-
By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 09:00 AM
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
WM - Majority; do pass with amendment(s) by Housing & Local Government.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 9:00 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 01:30 PM
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 1:30 PM.
-
Referred to Ways & Means.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing & Local Government at 10:30 AM
-
And refer to Ways & Means.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
HLG - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Housing & Local Government at 10:30 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing & Local Government at 08:00 AM
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing & Local Government at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Housing & Local Government.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 54; nays, 43; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Vote on third reading will be reconsidered.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 56; nays, 41; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted (LG 21).
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 10:00 AM
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
LG - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Local Government at 10:00 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 10:00 AM
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 10:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Local Government.
Sponsors
- Gerry Pollet · Cosponsor
- Harris-Talley · Cosponsor
- Nicole Macri · Cosponsor
- Wicks · Cosponsor
- Jessica Bateman · Cosponsor
- Lillian Ortiz-Self · Cosponsor
- April Berg · Cosponsor
- Davina Duerr · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on · 42 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Davina Duerr Democrat
Co-sponsors (7)
- Gerry Pollet Democrat
- Harris-Talley
- Nicole Macri Democrat
- Wicks
- Jessica Bateman Democrat
- Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat
- April Berg Democrat
Not signed on (143)
143 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 143 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 27 | 21 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 43% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Nay |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Nay |
| Honeyford | — | Nay |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Nay |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Nay |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sefzik | — | Nay |
| Sheldon | — | Nay |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Nay |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Yasmin Trudeau | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Nay |
| Curtis King | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Nay |
| John Braun | Republican | Nay |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Nay |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Nay |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 46 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 43 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 44% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chambers | — | Nay |
| Chandler | — | Nay |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Gilday | — | Nay |
| Harris-Talley | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Nay |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Nay |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Nay |
| Maycumber | — | Nay |
| McCaslin | — | Nay |
| Mosbrucker | — | Nay |
| Robertson | — | Nay |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Nay |
| Vick | — | Nay |
| Wicks | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Nay |
| Young | — | Nay |
| Johnson, J. | — | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandy Donaghy | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Nay |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Nay |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Nay |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Nay |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Nay |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Nay |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Nay |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Nay |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Nay |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Nay |
| Joel McEntire | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Nay |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Nay |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Nay |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Nay |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 46 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 41 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 42% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chambers | — | Nay |
| Chandler | — | Nay |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Gilday | — | Nay |
| Harris-Talley | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Nay |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Nay |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Nay |
| Maycumber | — | Nay |
| McCaslin | — | Nay |
| Mosbrucker | — | Nay |
| Robertson | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Nay |
| Vick | — | Nay |
| Wicks | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Nay |
| Young | — | Nay |
| Johnson, J. | — | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Nay |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Nay |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Nay |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Nay |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Nay |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Nay |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Nay |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Nay |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Nay |
| Joel McEntire | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Nay |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Nay |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Nay |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Nay |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 45 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 43 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 44% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chambers | — | Nay |
| Chandler | — | Nay |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Gilday | — | Nay |
| Harris-Talley | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Nay |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Nay |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Nay |
| Maycumber | — | Nay |
| McCaslin | — | Nay |
| Mosbrucker | — | Nay |
| Robertson | — | Nay |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Nay |
| Vick | — | Nay |
| Wicks | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Nay |
| Young | — | Nay |
| Johnson, J. | — | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Nay |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Nay |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Nay |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Nay |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Nay |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Nay |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Nay |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Nay |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Nay |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Nay |
| Joel McEntire | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Nay |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Nay |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Nay |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Nay |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1241?
- HB 1241 is sponsored by Gerry Pollet (Democrat), Harris-Talley, Nicole Macri (Democrat), Wicks, Jessica Bateman (Democrat), Lillian Ortiz-Self (Democrat), April Berg (Democrat), and Davina Duerr (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1241?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 18, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1241?
- Track HB 1241 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1241
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1241
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →