Concerning local parks funding options.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1025 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1025.
You're tracking HB 1025
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1025 — Concerning local parks funding options.
Last action — Referred to Rules 2 Review.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
89 added · 124 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to House Bill 1025 includes new findings that highlight the significant increase in sports participation, particularly noting a nearly 300 percent rise in adult sports within a community in eastern Washington. This change emphasizes the need for better maintenance of local athletic fields and provides additional support for parks and recreation agencies to manage the growing demand. By addressing these needs, the bill aims to ensure that communities can accommodate more residents looking to engage in sports and outdoor activities, which is important for promoting health and well-being.
H-2365.1H-0100.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1025 State of Washington 67th Legislature 20222021 Regular Session By House Finance (originally sponsored by Representatives Wicks, Eslick, Shewmake, Duerr, Ramel, Senn, Ortiz-Self, Ryu, Goehner, Jacobsen, and Pollet)Pollet READPrefiled FIRST12/15/20. TIME 01/28/22.
Read first time 01/11/21.
Referred to Committee on Finance.
1 SHBHB 1025 TheFinally, the legislature finds that onelocal ofparks the best and mostrecreation cost-agencies effectiveare waysdealing forwith thea residentstremendous ofgrowth Washingtonin statethe tonumber achieveof physicalsports participants and mentala health,corollary andof tosharp preventincreases costlyin diseasesdemand andfor conditionslocal suchathletic asfields, diabetes,including obesity,a heartnearly disease,300 andpercent otherincrease coronaryin conditions,adult issports toparticipation getbeing regularexperienced exerciseby andone physicaleastern activity.Washington community.
InTherefore, fact,it asis partthe intent of athe studylegislature doneto forestablish theadditional recreationstatutory andtools conservationto officehelp onlocal theparks benefitsand ofrecreation trail-basedagencies activities,better theaddress Universitymaintenance ofbacklogs, Washingtonpreserve conductedquality aopen literaturespaces, reviewand ofexpand overand 100improve studiesathletic thatfields identifiedto evidenceaccommodate the influx of aadult closeand linkageyouth betweensports healthparticipants benefitswho andare beingvying outdoors.for use of those fields.
The literature review further found that the health benefits of nature "may be particularly impactful for the 12.2 percent who have incomes below the poverty level." The legislature further finds that public parks and trails, recreation programs, and open spaces offer equitable, no-cost, or low-cost options for all residents to be active and healthy, with these spaces receiving record levels of use during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Finally, the legislature finds that while local parks facilities and spaces provide affordable recreation opportunities for all segments of their communities, new funding can be paired with ways to enhance equitable access to programs, and to determine how additional resources can help address imbalances for lower-income, historically underserved, and historically marginalized communities.
Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature to establish additional statutory tools to help local parks and recreation agencies better address maintenance backlogs, preserve quality open spaces, better serve communities experiencing inequities and lacking access to programs, and expand and improve the number and type of facilities that support healthy living.
The title of the ballot p.measure must clearly state the purposes for which the proposed sales tax will be used.
2 SHB 1025 measure must clearly state the purposes for which the proposed sales tax will be used.
(b) If both a county and a metropolitan park district or park district within the boundaries of the county exercise the authority provided in this section, the metropolitan park district or park districtp. must impose the excise tax within its incorporated boundaries, and the county must impose the excise tax within the unincorporated areas.
2 HB 1025 district must impose the excise tax within its incorporated boundaries, and the county must impose the excise tax within the unincorporated areas.
The tax, if not imposed under the conditions of subsection (5) of this section, may p.be extended for a period not exceeding 10 years with an affirmative vote of the voters voting at the election.
3 SHB 1025 be extended for a period not exceeding 10 years with an affirmative vote of the voters voting at the election.
(7) To carry out the purposes of this section, the entity imposing the tax has the authority to issue general obligation or revenue bonds within the limitations now or hereafter prescribed by the laws of this state, for a term not to exceed 20 years, and may use,p. and is authorized to pledge, the moneys collected for repayment of such bonds.
(8)3 InHB evaluating1025 theuse, useand ofis fundsauthorized approvedto bypledge, votersthe undermoneys thiscollected section,for localrepayment parksof andsuch recreationbonds. agencies must:
(a) Use a participatory framework that includes input from a community advisory committee reflective of that agency's population demographics;
(b) Evaluate social and environmental justice conditions and impacts using the department of health's environmental health disparities map.
The evaluation must include opportunities to enhance equitable access to parks and recreation properties and facilities and program imbalance to better assure that lower income, historically underserved, and historically marginalized communities can benefit from available resources.
This evaluation must be made public through a city or county council public meeting or made available on the city's or county's public website;
and (c) Give special consideration to addressing environmental justice goals and policies, examining ways that local parks programs can help address health disparities, and measuring program performance in these areas.
4 SHBHB 1025
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Finance at 08:00 AM
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
FIN - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Finance at 8:00 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Finance at 01:30 PM
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Finance at 1:30 PM.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
-
Executive session scheduled, but no action was taken in the House Committee on Finance at 8:00 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Finance at 08:00 AM
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Finance at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Finance.
Sponsors
- Gerry Pollet · Cosponsor
- Cyndy Jacobsen · Cosponsor
- Keith Goehner · Cosponsor
- Cindy Ryu · Cosponsor
- Lillian Ortiz-Self · Cosponsor
- Alex Ramel · Cosponsor
- Davina Duerr · Cosponsor
- Sharon Shewmake · Cosponsor
- Carolyn Eslick · Cosponsor
- Wicks · Primary
- Tana Senn · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 140 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wicks
Co-sponsors (10)
- Gerry Pollet Democrat
- Cyndy Jacobsen Republican
- Keith Goehner Republican
- Cindy Ryu Democrat
- Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat
- Alex Ramel Democrat
- Davina Duerr Democrat
- Sharon Shewmake Democrat
- Carolyn Eslick Republican
- Tana Senn Democrat
Not signed on (140)
140 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 140 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1025?
- HB 1025 is sponsored by Gerry Pollet (Democrat), Cyndy Jacobsen (Republican), Keith Goehner (Republican), Cindy Ryu (Democrat), Lillian Ortiz-Self (Democrat), Alex Ramel (Democrat), Davina Duerr (Democrat), Sharon Shewmake (Democrat), Carolyn Eslick (Republican), Wicks, and Tana Senn (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1025?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1025?
- Track HB 1025 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1025
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1025
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →