SB 5259 — Concerning law enforcement data collection.
Last action — Effective date 7/25/2021.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 18, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
20 sponsors
1 primary, 19 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (13 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
154 added · 257 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of Bill SB 5259 removed references to creating a new chapter and clarified its focus on law enforcement transparency and accountability. This is important because it streamlines the bill and emphasizes the establishment of a statewide data collection program that aims to improve community trust and the effectiveness of police practices. By focusing on guiding law enforcement data collection and analysis, the bill aims to foster better relationships between police and the communities they serve.
S-0821.2Z-0146.1 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5259 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2021 Regular Session By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Nobles, Carlyle, Darneille, Das, Dhingra, Frockt, Hasegawa, Hunt, Keiser, Kuderer, Liias, Lovelett, Nguyen, Pedersen, Randall, Robinson, Saldaña, Stanford, Wellman, and Wilson, C.;
by request of Attorney General)General READRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/05/21.01/18/21.
Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.
adding a new chaptersections to Titlechapter 1010.114 RCW;
and creating a new section.section;
providing effective dates;
and declaring an emergency.
The legislature finds that law enforcement transparency and accountability are vital in maintaining public trust.
Data collection is one essential tool to allow the public, law enforcement, and policymakers to analyze the effectiveness of existing police practices, determine which policies and training work and do not work, and avoid unintended consequences by supporting policy decisions with clear and relevant data.
TheNEW legislatureSECTION. finds that creating a statewide data collection program that creates a publicly accessible database to track metrics will help to promote openness, transparency, and accountability, build stronger police-community relations, improve trust and confidence in policing services, evaluate specific areas of concern such as biased policing and excessive force, and ultimately improve the quality of policing services.
p.
1 SSB 5259 NEW SECTION.
(1) "Great"General bodilyauthority harm"Washington law enforcement agency" has the same meaning as in RCW 9A.04.110.10.93.020.
(2) "Law"Great enforcementbodily agency"harm" includeshas anythe "generalsame authoritymeaning Washington law enforcement agency" and "limited authority Washington law enforcement agency" as those terms are defined in RCW 10.93.020.9A.04.110.
(3) "Substantial bodily harm" has the same meaning as in RCW 9A.04.110.
(4) "University" means a four-year institution of higher education.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
3.
(1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for these purposes:
(a) The attorney general's office shall establish an advisory group to design a program to examine any additional data needs or gaps necessary to implement or carry out the university's use of force data program.
The advisory group shall consult with private or public entities where there are additional data elements that would be beneficial to furthering the intent of this act.
Those additional data elements, as determined by the advisory group, shall also be provided as recommendations to the legislature.
Recommendations resulting from this advisory group shall be provided to the legislature by December 1, 2021.
This advisory group shall include:
(i) At least three representatives from local nongovernmental organizations or advocacy groups that are focused on the interactions between law enforcement and the community;
(ii) At least three representatives from law enforcement agencies or organizations representing the interests of law enforcement by interacting and utilizing this data;
and (iii) At least one representative from the private sector, with experience in data collection programs, preferably law enforcement data collection.
(b) Any staff or researchers supporting the program or its contractors must have appropriate expertise and experience in data collection and analysis, including training in racial equity issues.
(2) The advisory group shall meet at least on a bi-monthly basis, or until the program is finalized and approved.
21 SSBSB 5259 (3) The"Limited advisoryauthority groupWashington maylaw requestenforcement andagency" solicithas information on ideas for the design,same development,meaning andas managementin ofRCW the10.93.020. data collection program from qualified universities and experts.
(4) By"Local Januarygovernment 1,entities" 2022,has the advisorysame groupmeaning shallas submitin toRCW the48.62.021. attorney general their recommendations for the statewide implementation of a data collection program, reporting, and publication program, which must include the following elements:
(a)(5) Prioritize"Substantial thebodily useharm" ofhas forcethe datasame collectionmeaning elementsas and obligations in sectionRCW 49A.04.110. of this act;
(b)(6) Define"Tort thepayout" specificmeans datathe toamount bepaid collectedpursuant fromto law enforcement agencies on interactions between officers and the public,settlement this includes additional incidents and interactions and additional details of thosea incidentsclaim, andsettlement interactions,agreement, suchor asjudgment trafficentered stops,by callsa forcourt services,in arrests,a vehiclecivil pursuits,action. and disciplinary actions as identified by the advisory group;
(c) Establish procedures and deadlines for law enforcement agencies to collect and report data to the university, which should incorporate methodologies based in best practices or those tested and validated in other jurisdictions, where possible;
(d) Establish procedures for the public to report relevant information to the university directly, or its successor, including correcting misreported and otherwise incorrect data;
(e) Establish reporting, analyzing, and publishing practices and procedures for the university and its contractors, which must include, at a minimum:
(i) Public access to data and analysis in a searchable format published on a website by the university;
(ii) Access to raw and/or refined data for academic research;
(iii) Interactive data visualization tools designed for law enforcement agencies and other entities to use the data for research, professional development, training, and management;
Show all 112 changed lines (72 more)
(iv) The ability to extract data from incident reports, or other electronic means, and officer narratives in order to standardize data across multiple agencies;
(v) Analysis of data, using methodologies based in best practices or those tested and validated in other jurisdictions, if possible, including, but not limited to, analysis of the data using legal algorithms based on available and applicable legal standards;
(vi) Analytical dashboards with individual officer details for use by law enforcement agencies as a risk management tool;
p.
3 SSB 5259 (vii) Agency level comparative dashboards for all law enforcement agencies in the state;
(viii) Historical data, if available, in order to identify long- term trends and patterns;
and (ix) Semiannual reports, summarizing the data collected and any related analysis, published on the website and submitted to the legislature and governor by March 30th and September 30th of each year;
and (f) Consider phased implementation, if necessary, for collecting and reporting data on different types of interactions and incidents based on current practices and currently available data as compared to additional practices that must be put into place by individual agencies across the state, provided that any phased implementation prioritizes use of force data as provided in section 4 of this act.
(4)(a) The office of the attorney general shall review the policy submitted pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, and shall approve or reject the policy, either in part or in full, based on recommendations of the advisory group and the funding available and necessary to achieve those recommendations.
In reviewing the policy, the office of the attorney general shall consider:
(i) The interests of the public in accessing information in a transparent and expedient manner.
In considering the interests of the public, the advisory board shall accept and consider comments from impacted family members or their designees;
(ii) The institutional operations and demands of law enforcement agencies and the university.
In considering the institutional operations and demands of law enforcement, the attorney general shall accept and consider comment from the criminal justice training center and local law enforcement agencies.
(b) If the policy is rejected, in part or in full, the advisory group shall submit a revised policy in accordance with any deadlines established by the office of the attorney general.
Regardless of any revisions to the policy or any phased implementation approved by the office of the attorney general, data collection, reporting, and publication shall commence by July 1, 2022, on the elements provided under section 4 of this act.
The office of the attorney general may approve a policy with an earlier implementation deadline, if recommended by the advisory group.
(5) Following the approval of the policy under subsection (4) of this section, the university, or its successor, may submit revisions p.
4 SSB 5259 to the policy to modify the types of data collected and reported in section 4 of this act, including requiring reporting of additional data from law enforcement agencies.
The office of the attorney general shall review and approve or reject any requested revisions in accordance with this section.
(6) Following the approval of the program, the advisory board shall conduct a competitive bidding process to select a university to design, develop, and manage the data collection program according to the approved specifications.
The selected university will be responsible for meeting all the requirements in section 4 of this act.
4.3.
(1) TheBy universityJanuary shall31st, establishApril 30th, July 31st, and maintainOctober a31st program,annually, ineach consultationgeneral withauthority theWashington advisorylaw groupenforcement agency and each limited authority Washington law enforcement agency shall report to collect,Washington report,State andUniversity publishor its successor, in a manner developed by Washington State University, information onunder lawsubsection enforcement's(2) useof this section of force.all incidents that occurred in the preceding three months:
The(a) programIn mustwhich bea operatedfatality into accordancea withperson theoccurs policyconnected approvedto by the officeuse of theforce attorneyby general.a law enforcement officer;
All(b) lawIn enforcementwhich agenciesthere shallis submitgreat thebodily dataharm byto way of incident reports, or other electronic means, in a mannerperson specifiedconnected by the university, to the universityuse asof requiredforce underby subsectiona (2)law ofenforcement thisofficer; section when:
(a)(c) AIn fatalitywhich occursthere inis connectionsubstantial withbodily harm to a person connected to the use of force by a law enforcement officer;
(b)and Great(d) bodilyIn harmthe occursabsence inof connectioneither withdeath, thegreat usebodily ofharm, forceor bysubstantial bodily harm, when a law enforcement officer;officer:
(c) Substantial bodily harm occurs in connection with the use of force by a law enforcement officer;
or (d) A law enforcement officer:
p.(ix) Uses a vehicle to intentionally strike a person or vehicle;
5 SSB 5259 (ix) Uses a vehicle to intentionally strike a person or vehicle;p.
or2 SB 5259 (x) Either deploys a canine by releasing it from the physical control of the law enforcement officer, if it bites a person, or both.
and (q) The entity conducting the independent investigation of the incident, if applicable;applicable.
(r) Any other information required by the policy under section 3 of this act;
p.
6 SSB 5259 (s) Whether dashboard or body worn camera footage was recorded for an incident;
(t) Number of officers who were present when force was used;
(u) Number of suspects who were present when force was used.
(3) All law enforcement agencies shall develop a reporting plan with the university for any additional data required by the policy under this section, including additional types of interactions and incidents where force is contemplated but not expressly outlined as listed in subsection (2) of this section, and additional data relevant to such interactions and incidents.
(4) In carrying out the requirements of this section, the university may contract with public and private institutions of higher education, other organizations, and businesses with significant expertise and experience in collecting, tracking, and reporting data on law enforcement's interactions with the public in the state.
(5) All law enforcement agencies shall report to the university any additional data required by the policy under section 3 of this act, including additional types of interactions and incidents, and additional data relevant to such interactions and incidents.
(6) All law enforcement agencies shall submit the data required under this section to the university in the format and by the deadlines established by the policy under section 3 of this act, provided that agencies begin submitting data required under subsections (1) and (2) of this section no later than July 1, 2022, and provided that such submissions must occur on at least a quarterly basis.
4.
(1) By July 31st of each year, the office of risk management shall provide Washington State University or its p.
3 SB 5259 successor the amount of any tort payout, broken out by agency, occurring in the preceding 12 months involving an allegation of the improper use of force by any general authority Washington peace officer or limited authority Washington peace officer employed by any agency, department, or division of state government.
(2) By July 31st of each year, local government entities shall provide Washington State University or its successor the amount of any tort payout, broken out by jurisdiction, occurring in the preceding 12 months involving an allegation of the improper use of force by any general authority Washington peace officer or limited authority Washington peace officer employed by any agency, department, or division of a municipal corporation, political subdivision, or other unit of local government of this state.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
Sections(1) 2Subject throughto 4the availability of amounts appropriated for this actpurpose, constituteWashington aState newUniversity chapteror inits Titlesuccessor 10shall RCW.establish and maintain an online repository for the collection of information from law enforcement agencies and the public regarding law enforcement's use of force.
(2) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this purpose, Washington State University or its successor shall:
(a) By February 28th, May 31st, August 31st, and November 30th of each year, publish the information received under section 3 of this act in a searchable format on a public website;
(b) By March 30th and September 30th of each year, summarize the information received under section 3 of this act on a public website, including through the use of visual displays including, but not limited to, graphs and charts;
(c) By March 30th and September 30th of each year, submit the summary information in (b) of this subsection to the legislature;
(d) By September 30th of each year, publish the information received under section 4 of this act on a public website;
and (e) By September 30th of each year, submit the summary information in (d) of this subsection to the legislature.
(3) Information gathered from law enforcement agencies and the public shall be displayed separately on the website.
(4) Nothing in this chapter precludes Washington State University or its successor from working with private or public entities to develop the technology or tools necessary to collect or publicize the data collected by this chapter.
p.
4 SB 5259 NEW SECTION.
Sec.
6.
Sections 2 through 5 of this act are each added to chapter 10.114 RCW.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
7.
Section 5 of this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect July 1, 2021.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
8.
Sections 1 through 4 of this act take effect July 1, 2022.
75 SSBSB 5259
Show all 112 changed rows (72 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Engrossed Second Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Second Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
Effective date 7/25/2021.
-
Chapter 326, 2021 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
Speaker signed.
-
President signed.
-
Passed final passage; yeas, 46; nays, 2; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Senate concurred in House amendments.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 97; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Committee amendment not adopted.
-
Committee amendment(s) adopted as amended.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 09:00 AM
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 09:00 AM
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
APP - Majority; do pass with amendment(s) but without amendment(s) by Public Safety.
-
Public hearing and executive action taken in the House Committee on Appropriations at 9:00 AM.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Public Safety at 08:00 AM
-
PS - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Public Safety at 8:00 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Public Safety at 08:00 AM
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Public Safety at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Public Safety.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 46; nays, 2; absent, 1; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
2nd substitute bill substituted (WM 21).
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 09:30 AM
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 9:30 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 01:30 PM
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 1:30 PM.
-
Referred to Ways & Means.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM
-
And refer to Ways & Means.
-
LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Law & Justice.
Sponsors
- Lisa Wellman · Cosponsor
- Derek Stanford · Cosponsor
- Rebecca Saldaña · Cosponsor
- June Robinson · Cosponsor
- Randall · Cosponsor
- Jamie Pedersen · Cosponsor
- Liz Lovelett · Cosponsor
- Marko Liias · Cosponsor
- Kuderer · Cosponsor
- Keiser · Cosponsor
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Frockt · Cosponsor
- Manka Dhingra · Cosponsor
- Das · Cosponsor
- Darneille · Cosponsor
- Carlyle · Cosponsor
- T'wina Nobles · Primary
- Joe Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Claire Wilson · Cosponsor
- Victoria Hunt · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 19 co-sponsors · 131 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- T'wina Nobles Democrat
Co-sponsors (19)
- Lisa Wellman Democrat
- Derek Stanford Democrat
- Rebecca Saldaña Democrat
- June Robinson Democrat
- Randall
- Jamie Pedersen Democrat
- Liz Lovelett Democrat
- Marko Liias Democrat
- Kuderer
- Keiser
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Frockt
- Manka Dhingra Democrat
- Das
- Darneille
- Carlyle
- Joe Nguyen Democrat
- Claire Wilson Democrat
- Victoria Hunt Democrat
Not signed on (131)
131 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 131 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 46 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 4% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Nay |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 47 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 97 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 1% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chambers | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Yea |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Gilday | — | Yea |
| Harris-Talley | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Yea |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Yea |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| McCaslin | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Robertson | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Yea |
| Wicks | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Johnson, J. | — | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Nay |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Yea |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Joel McEntire | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 46 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 4% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Not Voting |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Nay |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5259?
- SB 5259 is sponsored by Lisa Wellman (Democrat), Derek Stanford (Democrat), Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), June Robinson (Democrat), Randall, Jamie Pedersen (Democrat), Liz Lovelett (Democrat), Marko Liias (Democrat), Kuderer, Keiser, Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Frockt, Manka Dhingra (Democrat), Das, Darneille, Carlyle, T'wina Nobles (Democrat), Joe Nguyen (Democrat), Claire Wilson (Democrat), and Victoria Hunt (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 5259?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 18, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 5259?
- Track SB 5259 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5259
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5259
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →