Washington 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted 13 D cosponsors

SB 5259 — Concerning law enforcement data collection.

Last action — Effective date 7/25/2021.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 18, 2021. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 20 sponsors

    1 primary, 19 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (13 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

154 added · 257 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of Bill SB 5259 removed references to creating a new chapter and clarified its focus on law enforcement transparency and accountability. This is important because it streamlines the bill and emphasizes the establishment of a statewide data collection program that aims to improve community trust and the effectiveness of police practices. By focusing on guiding law enforcement data collection and analysis, the bill aims to foster better relationships between police and the communities they serve.

→
Previous
Latest
S-0821.2 SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5259 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2021 Regular Session By Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Nobles, Carlyle, Darneille, Das, Dhingra, Frockt, Hasegawa, Hunt, Keiser, Kuderer, Liias, Lovelett, Nguyen, Pedersen, Randall, Robinson, Saldaña, Stanford, Wellman, and Wilson, C.;
Z-0146.1 SENATE BILL 5259 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2021 Regular Session By Senators Nobles, Carlyle, Darneille, Das, Dhingra, Frockt, Hasegawa, Hunt, Keiser, Kuderer, Liias, Lovelett, Nguyen, Pedersen, Randall, Robinson, Saldaña, Stanford, Wellman, and Wilson, C.;
by request of Attorney General) READ FIRST TIME 02/05/21.
by request of Attorney General Read first time 01/18/21.
Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.
adding a new chapter to Title 10 RCW;
adding new sections to chapter 10.114 RCW;
and creating a new section.
creating a new section;
providing effective dates;
and declaring an emergency.
The legislature finds that law enforcement transparency and accountability are vital in maintaining public trust.
The legislature finds that transparency and accountability are vital in maintaining public trust.
Data collection is one essential tool to allow the public, law enforcement, and policymakers to analyze the effectiveness of existing police practices, determine which policies and training work and do not work, and avoid unintended consequences by supporting policy decisions with clear and relevant data.
Data collection is one essential tool to allow the public, law enforcement, and policymakers to analyze the effectiveness of existing practices, determine which policies and training work and do not work, and avoid unintended consequences by supporting policy decisions with clear and relevant data.
The legislature finds that creating a statewide data collection program that creates a publicly accessible database to track metrics will help to promote openness, transparency, and accountability, build stronger police-community relations, improve trust and confidence in policing services, evaluate specific areas of concern such as biased policing and excessive force, and ultimately improve the quality of policing services.
NEW SECTION.
p.
1 SSB 5259 NEW SECTION.
(1) "Great bodily harm" has the same meaning as in RCW 9A.04.110.
(1) "General authority Washington law enforcement agency" has the same meaning as in RCW 10.93.020.
(2) "Law enforcement agency" includes any "general authority Washington law enforcement agency" and "limited authority Washington law enforcement agency" as those terms are defined in RCW 10.93.020.
(2) "Great bodily harm" has the same meaning as in RCW 9A.04.110.
(3) "Substantial bodily harm" has the same meaning as in RCW 9A.04.110.
(4) "University" means a four-year institution of higher education.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
3.
(1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for these purposes:
(a) The attorney general's office shall establish an advisory group to design a program to examine any additional data needs or gaps necessary to implement or carry out the university's use of force data program.
The advisory group shall consult with private or public entities where there are additional data elements that would be beneficial to furthering the intent of this act.
Those additional data elements, as determined by the advisory group, shall also be provided as recommendations to the legislature.
Recommendations resulting from this advisory group shall be provided to the legislature by December 1, 2021.
This advisory group shall include:
(i) At least three representatives from local nongovernmental organizations or advocacy groups that are focused on the interactions between law enforcement and the community;
(ii) At least three representatives from law enforcement agencies or organizations representing the interests of law enforcement by interacting and utilizing this data;
and (iii) At least one representative from the private sector, with experience in data collection programs, preferably law enforcement data collection.
(b) Any staff or researchers supporting the program or its contractors must have appropriate expertise and experience in data collection and analysis, including training in racial equity issues.
(2) The advisory group shall meet at least on a bi-monthly basis, or until the program is finalized and approved.
2 SSB 5259 (3) The advisory group may request and solicit information on ideas for the design, development, and management of the data collection program from qualified universities and experts.
1 SB 5259 (3) "Limited authority Washington law enforcement agency" has the same meaning as in RCW 10.93.020.
(4) By January 1, 2022, the advisory group shall submit to the attorney general their recommendations for the statewide implementation of a data collection program, reporting, and publication program, which must include the following elements:
(4) "Local government entities" has the same meaning as in RCW 48.62.021.
(a) Prioritize the use of force data collection elements and obligations in section 4 of this act;
(5) "Substantial bodily harm" has the same meaning as in RCW 9A.04.110.
(b) Define the specific data to be collected from law enforcement agencies on interactions between officers and the public, this includes additional incidents and interactions and additional details of those incidents and interactions, such as traffic stops, calls for services, arrests, vehicle pursuits, and disciplinary actions as identified by the advisory group;
(6) "Tort payout" means the amount paid pursuant to the settlement of a claim, settlement agreement, or judgment entered by a court in a civil action.
(c) Establish procedures and deadlines for law enforcement agencies to collect and report data to the university, which should incorporate methodologies based in best practices or those tested and validated in other jurisdictions, where possible;
(d) Establish procedures for the public to report relevant information to the university directly, or its successor, including correcting misreported and otherwise incorrect data;
(e) Establish reporting, analyzing, and publishing practices and procedures for the university and its contractors, which must include, at a minimum:
(i) Public access to data and analysis in a searchable format published on a website by the university;
(ii) Access to raw and/or refined data for academic research;
(iii) Interactive data visualization tools designed for law enforcement agencies and other entities to use the data for research, professional development, training, and management;
Show all 112 changed rows (72 more)
Previous
Latest
(iv) The ability to extract data from incident reports, or other electronic means, and officer narratives in order to standardize data across multiple agencies;
(v) Analysis of data, using methodologies based in best practices or those tested and validated in other jurisdictions, if possible, including, but not limited to, analysis of the data using legal algorithms based on available and applicable legal standards;
(vi) Analytical dashboards with individual officer details for use by law enforcement agencies as a risk management tool;
p.
3 SSB 5259 (vii) Agency level comparative dashboards for all law enforcement agencies in the state;
(viii) Historical data, if available, in order to identify long- term trends and patterns;
and (ix) Semiannual reports, summarizing the data collected and any related analysis, published on the website and submitted to the legislature and governor by March 30th and September 30th of each year;
and (f) Consider phased implementation, if necessary, for collecting and reporting data on different types of interactions and incidents based on current practices and currently available data as compared to additional practices that must be put into place by individual agencies across the state, provided that any phased implementation prioritizes use of force data as provided in section 4 of this act.
(4)(a) The office of the attorney general shall review the policy submitted pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, and shall approve or reject the policy, either in part or in full, based on recommendations of the advisory group and the funding available and necessary to achieve those recommendations.
In reviewing the policy, the office of the attorney general shall consider:
(i) The interests of the public in accessing information in a transparent and expedient manner.
In considering the interests of the public, the advisory board shall accept and consider comments from impacted family members or their designees;
(ii) The institutional operations and demands of law enforcement agencies and the university.
In considering the institutional operations and demands of law enforcement, the attorney general shall accept and consider comment from the criminal justice training center and local law enforcement agencies.
(b) If the policy is rejected, in part or in full, the advisory group shall submit a revised policy in accordance with any deadlines established by the office of the attorney general.
Regardless of any revisions to the policy or any phased implementation approved by the office of the attorney general, data collection, reporting, and publication shall commence by July 1, 2022, on the elements provided under section 4 of this act.
The office of the attorney general may approve a policy with an earlier implementation deadline, if recommended by the advisory group.
(5) Following the approval of the policy under subsection (4) of this section, the university, or its successor, may submit revisions p.
4 SSB 5259 to the policy to modify the types of data collected and reported in section 4 of this act, including requiring reporting of additional data from law enforcement agencies.
The office of the attorney general shall review and approve or reject any requested revisions in accordance with this section.
(6) Following the approval of the program, the advisory board shall conduct a competitive bidding process to select a university to design, develop, and manage the data collection program according to the approved specifications.
The selected university will be responsible for meeting all the requirements in section 4 of this act.
4.
3.
(1) The university shall establish and maintain a program, in consultation with the advisory group to collect, report, and publish information on law enforcement's use of force.
(1) By January 31st, April 30th, July 31st, and October 31st annually, each general authority Washington law enforcement agency and each limited authority Washington law enforcement agency shall report to Washington State University or its successor, in a manner developed by Washington State University, information under subsection (2) of this section of all incidents that occurred in the preceding three months:
The program must be operated in accordance with the policy approved by the office of the attorney general.
(a) In which a fatality to a person occurs connected to the use of force by a law enforcement officer;
All law enforcement agencies shall submit the data by way of incident reports, or other electronic means, in a manner specified by the university, to the university as required under subsection (2) of this section when:
(b) In which there is great bodily harm to a person connected to the use of force by a law enforcement officer;
(a) A fatality occurs in connection with the use of force by a law enforcement officer;
(c) In which there is substantial bodily harm to a person connected to the use of force by a law enforcement officer;
(b) Great bodily harm occurs in connection with the use of force by a law enforcement officer;
and (d) In the absence of either death, great bodily harm, or substantial bodily harm, when a law enforcement officer:
(c) Substantial bodily harm occurs in connection with the use of force by a law enforcement officer;
or (d) A law enforcement officer:
p.
(ix) Uses a vehicle to intentionally strike a person or vehicle;
5 SSB 5259 (ix) Uses a vehicle to intentionally strike a person or vehicle;
or p.
or (x) Either deploys a canine by releasing it from the physical control of the law enforcement officer, if it bites a person, or both.
2 SB 5259 (x) Either deploys a canine by releasing it from the physical control of the law enforcement officer, if it bites a person, or both.
(q) The entity conducting the independent investigation of the incident, if applicable;
and (q) The entity conducting the independent investigation of the incident, if applicable.
(r) Any other information required by the policy under section 3 of this act;
p.
6 SSB 5259 (s) Whether dashboard or body worn camera footage was recorded for an incident;
(t) Number of officers who were present when force was used;
(u) Number of suspects who were present when force was used.
(3) All law enforcement agencies shall develop a reporting plan with the university for any additional data required by the policy under this section, including additional types of interactions and incidents where force is contemplated but not expressly outlined as listed in subsection (2) of this section, and additional data relevant to such interactions and incidents.
(4) In carrying out the requirements of this section, the university may contract with public and private institutions of higher education, other organizations, and businesses with significant expertise and experience in collecting, tracking, and reporting data on law enforcement's interactions with the public in the state.
(5) All law enforcement agencies shall report to the university any additional data required by the policy under section 3 of this act, including additional types of interactions and incidents, and additional data relevant to such interactions and incidents.
(6) All law enforcement agencies shall submit the data required under this section to the university in the format and by the deadlines established by the policy under section 3 of this act, provided that agencies begin submitting data required under subsections (1) and (2) of this section no later than July 1, 2022, and provided that such submissions must occur on at least a quarterly basis.
4.
(1) By July 31st of each year, the office of risk management shall provide Washington State University or its p.
3 SB 5259 successor the amount of any tort payout, broken out by agency, occurring in the preceding 12 months involving an allegation of the improper use of force by any general authority Washington peace officer or limited authority Washington peace officer employed by any agency, department, or division of state government.
(2) By July 31st of each year, local government entities shall provide Washington State University or its successor the amount of any tort payout, broken out by jurisdiction, occurring in the preceding 12 months involving an allegation of the improper use of force by any general authority Washington peace officer or limited authority Washington peace officer employed by any agency, department, or division of a municipal corporation, political subdivision, or other unit of local government of this state.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
Sections 2 through 4 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 10 RCW.
(1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this purpose, Washington State University or its successor shall establish and maintain an online repository for the collection of information from law enforcement agencies and the public regarding law enforcement's use of force.
(2) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this purpose, Washington State University or its successor shall:
(a) By February 28th, May 31st, August 31st, and November 30th of each year, publish the information received under section 3 of this act in a searchable format on a public website;
(b) By March 30th and September 30th of each year, summarize the information received under section 3 of this act on a public website, including through the use of visual displays including, but not limited to, graphs and charts;
(c) By March 30th and September 30th of each year, submit the summary information in (b) of this subsection to the legislature;
(d) By September 30th of each year, publish the information received under section 4 of this act on a public website;
and (e) By September 30th of each year, submit the summary information in (d) of this subsection to the legislature.
(3) Information gathered from law enforcement agencies and the public shall be displayed separately on the website.
(4) Nothing in this chapter precludes Washington State University or its successor from working with private or public entities to develop the technology or tools necessary to collect or publicize the data collected by this chapter.
p.
4 SB 5259 NEW SECTION.
Sec.
6.
Sections 2 through 5 of this act are each added to chapter 10.114 RCW.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
7.
Section 5 of this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect July 1, 2021.
NEW SECTION.
Sec.
8.
Sections 1 through 4 of this act take effect July 1, 2022.
7 SSB 5259
5 SB 5259
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. Effective date 7/25/2021.

  2. Chapter 326, 2021 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. Speaker signed.

  6. President signed.

  7. Passed final passage; yeas, 46; nays, 2; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  8. Senate concurred in House amendments.

  9. Third reading, passed; yeas, 97; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  10. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  11. Committee amendment not adopted.

  12. Committee amendment(s) adopted as amended.

  13. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  14. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  15. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 09:00 AM

  16. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 09:00 AM

  17. Minority; without recommendation.

  18. APP - Majority; do pass with amendment(s) but without amendment(s) by Public Safety.

  19. Public hearing and executive action taken in the House Committee on Appropriations at 9:00 AM.

  20. Referred to Appropriations.

  21. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Public Safety at 08:00 AM

  22. PS - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  23. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Public Safety at 8:00 AM.

  24. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Public Safety at 08:00 AM

  25. Public hearing in the House Committee on Public Safety at 8:00 AM.

  26. First reading, referred to Public Safety.

  27. Third reading, passed; yeas, 46; nays, 2; absent, 1; excused, 0.

  28. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  29. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  30. 2nd substitute bill substituted (WM 21).

  31. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  32. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 09:30 AM

  33. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  34. Minority; without recommendation.

  35. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  36. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 9:30 AM.

  37. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 01:30 PM

  38. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 1:30 PM.

  39. Referred to Ways & Means.

  40. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM

  41. And refer to Ways & Means.

  42. LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  43. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.

  44. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM

  45. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.

  46. First reading, referred to Law & Justice.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 19 co-sponsors · 131 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (19)

Not signed on (131)

131 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 131 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 46 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 19100
Republican 11101
Democrat 16000
Total 46201
% of votes cast 94%4%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Billig — Yea
Brown — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Das — Yea
Ericksen — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Honeyford — Nay
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Padden — Yea
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Wilson, L. — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Not Voting
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 97 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 26000
Democrat 47100
Unaffiliated 24000
Total 97100
% of votes cast 99%1%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Chambers — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Gilday — Yea
Harris-Talley — Yea
Hoff — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Yea
Kretz — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Robertson — Yea
Sells — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Sutherland — Yea
Vick — Yea
Wicks — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Johnson, J. — Yea
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Alicia Rule Democrat Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
April Berg Democrat Yea
Bill Ramos Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Dan Bronoske Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
David Hackney Democrat Yea
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Liz Berry Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Nay
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Tarra Simmons Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Chris Corry Republican Yea
Cyndy Jacobsen Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Joel McEntire Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Mark Klicker Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Peter Abbarno Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 46 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 18101
Republican 12100
Democrat 16000
Total 46201
% of votes cast 94%4%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Billig — Yea
Brown — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Das — Yea
Ericksen — Not Voting
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Honeyford — Nay
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Padden — Yea
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Wilson, L. — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5259?
SB 5259 is sponsored by Lisa Wellman (Democrat), Derek Stanford (Democrat), Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), June Robinson (Democrat), Randall, Jamie Pedersen (Democrat), Liz Lovelett (Democrat), Marko Liias (Democrat), Kuderer, Keiser, Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Frockt, Manka Dhingra (Democrat), Das, Darneille, Carlyle, T'wina Nobles (Democrat), Joe Nguyen (Democrat), Claire Wilson (Democrat), and Victoria Hunt (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 5259?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 18, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 5259?
Track SB 5259 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5259

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5259

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →