Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: To Executive 6 R cosponsors

SB 312 — Relating to: programs and requirements to address perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Vetoed by Governor Tony Evers (Democratic) on April 09, 2024.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

306 added · 526 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of Senate Bill 312 introduces programs and requirements aimed at addressing hazardous substances known as PFAS (perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances). Notably, it allows municipal public utilities to use funds from their water or sewer services to help pay for projects aimed at reducing PFAS levels if the costs are less than those of required treatment upgrades. This change is significant because it empowers local utilities to take quicker action in mitigating potential health risks associated with PFAS, benefiting community health and safety.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2024 LEGISLATURE LRB-2936/1 MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SENATE BILL 312 May 24, 2023 - Introduced by Senators W IMBERGER, C OWLES, B ALLWEG , C ABRAL-GUEVARA , FELZKOWSKI, FEYEN , NASS and Q UINN, cosponsored by Representatives M URSAU, SWEARINGEN , BEHNKE , BINSFELD, D ITTRICH, D ONOVAN, GREEN , KITCHENS, M OSES, OC ONNOR, SNYDER , SPIRO, STEFFEN , SUMMERFIELD and W ITTKE.
Date of enactment:
Referred to Committee on Natural Resources and Energy.
Senate Bill 312 Date of publication*:
A N A CT to renumber 281.58 (8e);
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to renumber 281.58 (8e);
and to create 66.0224, 66.0811 (4), 196.03 (7), 196.49 (7), 281.58 (8e) (bm), 292.315 and 292.32 of the statutes;
and to create 66.0811 (4), 196.49 (7), 281.58 (8e) (bm), 281.75 (5m), 292.315, 292.32 and 292.34 of the statutes;
programs and requirements to address perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
programs and require- ments to address perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and modifying administrative rules related to emer- gency utility services and test wells for community water systems.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill creates several new programs and requirements relating to PFAS, which is defined in the bill to mean perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), and any other perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance for which a standard has been promulgated under state or federal law.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in (a) The public utility undertook the project in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
Municipal PFAS grant program The bill requires the Department of Natural Resources to create a municipal PFAS grant program to provide all of the following grants:
response to a public health concern caused by PFAS, as SECTION 1.
1.
66.0811 (4) of the statutes is created to defined in s.
Grants to municipalities (defined under current law as a city, town, village, county, county utility district, town sanitary district, public inland lake protection and rehabilitation district, or metropolitan sewage district), distributed in equal shares, for PFAS testing at municipal water systems and municipal wastewater treatment facilities, or for reimbursement for such testing.
292.315 (1), the presence of which was read:
2.
unknown to the public utility until shortly before it com- 66.0811 (4) Notwithstanding subs.
Grants to nonmunicipal entities regulated as public water systems, distributed in equal shares up to $1,800, to test their drinking water supply for PFAS, if required to do so by DNR, or for reimbursement for such testing.
- 2024 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2936/1 MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SENATE BILL 312 3.
Grants to municipalities to test for PFAS levels at municipally owned or managed locations where PFAS may be present.
These grants are not available to municipalities that receive a grant under this program to test for PFAS at municipal water systems and municipal wastewater treatment facilities.
These grants require matching funds of up to 20 percent from the applicant.
4.
Grants to municipalities to dispose of PFAS-containing biosolids at facilities that accept such biosolids.
These grants require matching funds of up to 20 percent from the applicant.
5.
Grants for capital costs or debt service, including for facility upgrades or new infrastructure, to municipalities that are small or disadvantaged or in which rates for water or wastewater utilities will increase by more than 20 percent as a direct result of steps taken to address PFAS contamination.
6.
Grants to municipalities for capital costs or other costs related to PFAS that are not otherwise paid from the segregated environmental improvement fund, including costs for addressing applicant-owned contaminated lands or costs incurred by fire departments.
These grants require matching funds of up to 20 percent from the applicant.
For all of the grants provided under the municipal PFAS grant program, DNR may not require a grant recipient to take any action to address PFAS unless PFAS levels exceed any existing standard under state or federal law or unless state or federal law otherwise allows DNR to require the grant recipient to take action.
The bill also prohibits DNR from publicly disclosing the results of any PFAS testing conducted under this grant program unless DNR notifies the grant recipient at least hours before publicly disclosing any test result.
Innocent landowner grant program The bill also requires DNR to provide grants to persons that own property with PFAS contamination that is not known to be the responsibility of the person.
The total amount of grants awarded may not exceed $250,000 and DNR may require grant recipients to provide matching funds of not more than 20 percent of the grant amount.
Limitations on DNR actions relating to PFAS Under the bill, DNR may not require the owner of a brownfield property to test for PFAS unless DNRhas information that the property previously had a substantial amount of uncontained PFAS.
“Brownfield property” is defined to mean abandoned, idle, or underused industrial or commercial facilities or sites, the expansion or redevelopment of which is adversely affected by actual or perceived environmental contamination.
Under the bill, DNR may not prevent, delay, or otherwise impede any development project or project of public works based on a presence of PFAS contamination unless DNR determines that 1) the project poses a measurable risk to public health or welfare, 2) there is a substantial risk that the project would lead to worsening environmental conditions, or 3) the entity proposing to complete the project is, as a result of negligence, responsible for the original contamination.
“Public works” is defined to mean the physical structures and facilities developed or acquired by a local unit of government or a federally recognized American Indian LRB-2936/1 - 2024 Legislature - 3 - MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SENATE BILL 312 tribe or band in this state to provide services and functions for the benefit and use of the public, including water, sewerage, waste disposal, utilities, and transportation.
In addition, under the bill, when testing for PFAS, DNR may not collect samples from lands not owned by the state without written permission from the landowner to collect samples, to test those samples, and to publicly disclose the results of that testing.
DNR also may not publicly disclose such PFAS testing results unless it notifies the landowner of the test results at least 72 hours before publicly disclosing them.
In addition, DNR may not take any enforcement action against a landowner based on the results of any PFAS testing conducted on samples taken from lands not owned by the state unless PFAS levels exceed any applicable limit under state or federal law or another applicable state or federal law requires DNR to take enforcement action.
In addition, DNR must respond to requests from any person to conduct PFAS testing on samples taken from the person's property if funds are available to do so, if there is a reasonable belief that PFAS contamination may be present on the property, and if existing information such as public water supply testing data is not available.
The bill also requires DNR, in the 2023-25 fiscal biennium, to increase its PFAS testing activities.
Fire fighting foam The bill requires DNR to survey or resurvey local fire departments about their use and possession of PFAS-containing fire fighting foam, send communications and information, and contract with a third party to collect PFAS-containing firefighting foam.
Well compensation grant program Under current law, an individual owner or renter of a contaminated private well, subject to eligibility requirements, may apply for a grant from DNR to cover a portion of the costs to treat the water, reconstruct the well, construct a new well, connect to a public water supply, or fill and seal the well.
The bill provides that a grant for costs to treat the water may be used to cover the cost of a filtration device and up to two replacement filters.
Portable water treatment system pilot project The bill requires DNR to contract with an entity to conduct a pilot project in which PFAS-contaminated surface water is partially or fully diverted to a portable treatment system and treated water is returned to the surface water.
Show all 300 changed rows (260 more)
Previous
Latest
DNR and the entity must conduct tests to evaluate the success of the pilot project.
Remedial action at sites contaminates by PFAS The bill requires DNR to begin response and remedial actions at any PFAS-contaminated site where a responsible party has not been identified or the responsible party is unable to pay for remediation.
Reduction of PFAS testing costs The bill requires DNR and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System to enter into a memorandum of understanding to ensure that the state laboratory of hygiene reduces the costs of conducting testing for PFAS by at least 10 - 2024 Legislature - 4 - LRB-2936/1 MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SENATE BILL 312 percent within two years.
The bill requires the state laboratory of hygiene to prepare a report on its efforts to reduce the cost of PFAS testing and the timeline for receiving testing results.
PFAS studies and reporting The bill requires DNR and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System to enter into a memorandum of understanding to 1) study and analyze the cost, feasibility, and effectiveness of different methods of treating PFAS before they are released into a water system or water body;
2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis of different options for disposing of biosolids or sludge that contains or may contain PFAS;
3) study and analyze the cost, feasibility, and effectiveness of different destruction and disposal methods for PFAS;
4) study and analyze the migration of PFAS into the bay of Green Bay;
and 5) create a comprehensive, interactive map showing all available PFAS testing data and, for each data point, whether it exceeds any applicable state or federal standard for PFAS.
Such data may not contain any personally identifiable information unless the entity to which the data applies is required to test and disclose its results under state or federal law.
DNR reporting requirements The bill requires DNR to report to the legislature once every six months for a period of three-years to provide a detailed description of DNR's expenditures under the bill and a detailed description of DNR's progress in implementing the provisions of the bill.
Clean water fund program and safe drinking water loan program Under current law, the Department of Administration and DNR administer the Safe Drinking Water Loan Program (SDWLP), which provides financial assistance to municipalities, and to the private owners of community water systems that serve municipalities, for projects that will help the municipalities comply with federal drinking water standards.
DNR establishes a funding priority list for SDWLP projects, and DOA allocates funding for those projects.
Also under current law, DNR administers the Clean Water Fund Program (CWFP), which provides financial assistance to municipalities for projects to control water pollution, such as sewage treatment plants.
Under the bill, if DNR, when ranking SDWLP or CWFP projects or determining an applicant's eligibility for assistance under those programs, considers whether an applicant that intends to extend service outside of municipal boundaries because of water contamination is “small” or “disadvantaged,” DNR must determine the applicant to be small or disadvantaged if the area receiving the extended service would normally be determined to be small or disadvantaged, regardless of whether the existing service area would normally be determined to be small or disadvantaged.
Public water utility projects Under current law, a public utility may not engage in certain construction, expansion, or other projects unless the Public Service Commission grants a certificate of authority (CA) for the proposed project.
Under the bill, if a water public utility or a combined water and sewer public utility (water utility) fails to obtain a LRB-2936/1 - 2024 Legislature - 5 - MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SENATE BILL 312 CA before commencing a project for which one is required, PSC may not investigate, impose a penalty against, or bring an action to enjoin the water utility if 1) the water utility undertook the project in response to a public health concern caused by PFAS or an emerging contaminant, the presence of which was unknown to the water utility until shortly before it commenced the project, and, if there is an applicable state or federal standard for the contaminant, the contaminant exceeded or was close to exceeding that standard;
2) the water utility submits the appropriate application and supporting documentation to PSC no later than six months after commencing the project;
and 3) the total cost of the project is not greater than $2,000,000 or 50 percent of the utility's operating expenses for the previous year, whichever is less.
Under current law, a water utility may not change the rates that it charges to customers without first applying to PSC for approval of the change.
This bill requires PSC to authorize a separate rate class of customers if requested by a water utility under certain circumstances.
Specifically, the bill requires this authorization with respect to those customers to whom water or combined water and sewer utility service was extended outside of the water utility's service territory in response to a public health concern caused by contamination.
Under the bill, PSC must authorize higher rates for this class of customers for the purpose of financing the extension of service.
The bill requires PSC to allow the class to remain in effect for 10 years or for the duration of any financing authorized to fund the extension of service, whichever is longer.
Limitations on annexation and use of revenue for PFAS source reduction measures Under the bill, no city or village may annex territory for which water or sewerage services have been extended beyond the city's or village's municipal boundaries due to an immediate public health concern from an emerging contaminant for at least three years following the completion of the extension of services unless two-thirds of the qualified electors residing in the affected territory vote to approve the annexation.
The bill also authorizes a municipal public utility or metropolitan sewerage district to use revenues from its water or sewerage services for up to half of the cost of pretreatment or other PFAS source reduction measures for an interconnected customer or other regular customer if the costs incurred are less than the costs of the upgrades otherwise required at the endpoint treatment facility and if the costs are approved by the governing body of the municipality or the metropolitan sewerage district.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
66.0224 of the statutes is created to read:
- 2024 Legislature - 6 - LRB-2936/1 MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SENATE BILL 312 SECTION 1 66.0224 Annexation of territory for which water or wastewater service is extended.
Notwithstanding ss.
66.0217, 66.0219, 66.0221, and 66.0223, no territory for which water or sewerage services have been extended beyond a city's or village's municipal boundaries due to an immediate public health concern from an emerging contaminant may be annexed by the city or village that extended services for a period of 3 years following the completion of the extension project unless a number of qualified electors residing in the territory for which services have been extended and subject to the proposed annexation equal to at least two-thirds of the votes cast for governor in the territory at the last gubernatorial election vote to approve the annexation.
SECTION 2.
66.0811 (4) of the statutes is created to read:
66.0811 (4) Notwithstanding subs.
66.0901 (11), a municipal public utility or a metropolitan sewerage district created under ss.
menced the project, and the public utility provides evi- dence showing that the utility has exceeded or is likely to 66.0901 (11), a municipal public utility or a metropolitan exceed the applicable promulgated state or federal stan- sewerage district created under ch.
200.21 to 200.65 may use funds derived from its water or sewerage services for up to half of the cost of pretreatment or other perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances source reduction measures for an interconnected customer or other regular customer if the costs incurred are less than the costs of the upgrades otherwise required at the endpoint treatment facility and if the costs are approved by the governing body of the municipality or the metropolitan sewerage district.
200 may use funds derived from its water or sewerage services for up to one− dard for that type of PFAS.
half the cost of pretreatment or other perfluoroalkyl and (b) The public utility promptly notifies the commis- polyfluoroalkyl substances source reduction measures sion of the work and, within 30 days after commencing for an interconnected customer or other regular customer the work, submits the appropriate application and sup- if the costs incurred are less than the costs of the upgrades porting documentation to the commission.
otherwise required at the endpoint treatment facility and (c) The total cost of the project is not greater than $2,000,000.
if the costs are approved by the governing body of the municipality or the metropolitan sewerage district.
196.03 (7) of the statutes is created to read:
281.58 (8e) of the statutes is renumbered SECTION 2.
196.03 (7) At the request of a water public utility or combined water and sewer public utility, the commission shall authorize a separate rate class of customers for those customers to whom water or combined water and sewer utility service was extended outside of the public utility's service territory in response to a public health concern caused by contamination.
196.49 (7) of the statutes is created to 281.58 (8e) (am).
The commission shall authorize higher rates for LRB-2936/1 - 2024 Legislature - 7 - MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SECTION 3 SENATE BILL 312 a class of customers authorized under this subsection than for other classes for the purpose of financing the extension of service to these customers.
read:
The commission shall allow the class of customers to remain in effect for 10 years or for the duration of any financing authorized to fund the extension of service to these customers, whichever is longer.
196.49 (7) of the statutes is created to read:
281.58 (8e) (bm) of the statutes is created 196.49 (7) With respect to a water public utility or a to read:
196.49 (7) With respect to a water public utility or a combined water and sewer public utility, the commission may not investigate, impose a penalty against, or bring an action to enjoin the utility for failing to obtain a certificate of authority before commencing a project for which one is required under this section if all of the following apply:
combined water and sewer public utility, the commission 281.58 (8e) (bm) If the department, when ranking may not investigate, impose a penalty against, or bring an projects under this subsection or determining an appli- action to enjoin the public utility for failing to obtain a cant’s eligibility for assistance under this section, consid- certificate of authority before commencing a project for ers whether an applicant that intends to extend service which one is required under this section if all of the fol- outside the boundaries of a municipality because of water lowing apply:
(a) The public utility undertook the project in response to a public health concern caused by an emerging contaminant or by PFAS, as defined in s.
contamination is small or disadvantaged, the department * Section 991.11,ISCONSINSTATUTE:
292.315 (1), the presence of which was unknown to the public utility until shortly before it commenced the project, and, if in response to a contaminant for which there is an applicable state or federal standard, the contaminant exceeded or was close to exceeding that standard.
Effective date of acts.
(b) The public utility submits the appropriate application and supporting documentation to the commission no later than 6 months after the project was commenced.
“Every act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the governor’s partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.” Wisconsin Act − 2 − 2023 Senate Bill 312 shall, to the extent allowable under federal law, deter- 292.315 Municipal PFAS grant program.
(c) The total cost of the project is not greater than $2,000,000 or 50 percent of the public utility's reported total operating expenses for the previous year, whichever is less.
(1) D EF - mine the applicant to be small or disadvantaged if the area INITION.
SECTION 5.
In this section, “PFAS” means any perfluo- receiving the extended service would normally be deter- roalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance.
281.58 (8e) of the statutes is renumbered 281.58 (8e) (am).
mined to be small or disadvantaged, regardless of (1m) A PPLICABILITY.
SECTION 6.
This section applies only to whether the existing service area would normally be PFAS for which there is a state or federal standard, a pub- determined to be small or disadvantaged.
281.58 (8e) (bm) of the statutes is created to read:
lic health recommendation from the department of health SECTION 5.
- 2024 Legislature - 8 - LRB-2936/1 MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SENATE BILL 312 S ECTION 6 281.58 (8e) (bm) If the department, when ranking projects under this subsection or determining an applicant's eligibility for assistance under this section, considers whether an applicant that intends to extend service outside of the boundaries of a municipality because of water contamination is small or disadvantaged, the department shall, to the extent allowable under federal law, determine the applicant to be small or disadvantaged if the area receiving the extended service would normally be determined to be small or disadvantaged, regardless of whether the existing service area would normally be determined to be small or disadvantaged.
281.61 (6) of the statutes is amended to services under s.
S ECTION 7.
160.07, or a health advisory issued by read:
281.61 (6) of the statutes is amended to read:
the federal environmental protection agency.
281.61 (6) PRIORITY LIST.The department shall establish a priority list that ranks each safe drinking water loan program project.
281.61 (6) P RIORITY LIST.
The department shall promulgate rules for determining project rankings that, to the extent possible, give priority to projects that address the most serious risks to human health, that are necessary to ensure compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 USC 300f to 300j-26, and that assist applicants that are most in need on a per household basis, according to affordability criteria specified in the rules.
The department shall (2) G RANTS.
For the purpose of ranking projects under this subsection, the department shall treat a project to upgrade a public water system to provide continuous disinfection of the water that it distributes as if the public water system were a surface water system that federal law requires to provide continuous disinfection.
The department shall provide all of the establish a priority list that ranks each safe drinking water following grants:
If the department, when ranking projects under this subsection or determining an applicant's eligibility for assistance under this section, considers whether an applicant that intends to extend service outside of the boundaries of a local governmental unit because of water contamination is small or disadvantaged, the department shall, to the extent allowable under federal law, LRB-2936/1 - 2024 Legislature - 9 - MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs S ECTION 7 SENATE BILL 312 determine the applicant to be small or disadvantaged if the area receiving the extended service would normally be determined to be small or disadvantaged, regardless of whether the existing service area would normally be determined to be small or disadvantaged.
loan program project.
S ECTION 8.
The department shall promulgate (a) Grants to municipalities to test for PFAS levels at rules for determining project rankings that, to the extent municipal water systems and municipal wastewater possible, give priority to projects that address the most treatment facilities, or to reimburse municipalities for serious risks to human health, that are necessary to ensure PFAS testing performed at properties owned, leased, compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 USC managed, or contracted for by those municipalities after 300f to 300j−26, and that assist applicants that are most applicable standards for the chemical being tested have in need on a per household basis, according to affordabil- been promulgated.
The department shall base the ity criteria specified in the rules.
For the purpose of rank- amount of grant awards under this paragraph on the cost ing projects under this subsection, the department shall of testing and the amount of testing needed in each com- treat a project to upgrade a public water system to provide munity, while ensuring that funding is available to every continuous disinfection of the water that it distributes as eligible applicant that submits a claim under this para- if the public water system were a surface water system graph.
The department may not require a municipality that federal law requires to provide continuous disinfec- that submits a claim for a grant under this paragraph to tion.
If the department, when ranking projects under this provide information other than the basic information subsection or determining an applicant’s eligibility for necessary to process the claim and may not require the assistance under this section, considers whether an appli- recipient of a grant under this paragraph to provide any cant that intends to extend service outside the boundaries matching funds.
of a local governmental unit because of water contamina- (b) Grants, provided in equal shares not to exceed tion is small or disadvantaged, the department shall, to $1,800, to entities that are not municipalities and that are the extent allowable under federal law, determine the regulated as public or community water systems for the applicant to be small or disadvantaged if the area receiv- entity to test its drinking water supply for PFAS if ing the extended service would normally be determined required to do so by the department, or for reimbursement to be small or disadvantaged, regardless of whether the to the entity for PFAS testing performed after applicable existing service area would normally be determined to be standards for the chemical being tested have been pro- small or disadvantaged.
mulgated.
An entity that is not a municipality may apply SECTION 6.
281.75 (5m) of the statutes is created to to the department one time for a grant under this para- read:
graph, by a deadline set by the department.
The depart- 281.75 (5m) REFERRAL TO THE INNOCENT ment may not require the recipient of a grant under this LANDOWNER GRANT PROGRAM.
If the department deter- paragraph to provide any matching funds.
mines that a claimant that submits a claim under this sec- (c) Grants, provided in equal shares not to exceed tion on the basis of contamination by perfluoroalkyl or $15,000, to the owner or manager of, or the holder of a polyfluoroalkyl substances would be eligible for a grant solid waste facility license issued by the department for, under the innocent landowner grant program under s.
privately owned solid waste disposal facilities to test for 292.34, and moneys are available under s.
292.34, the the presence of PFAS in leachate.
An entity may apply department shall refer the claim to the program under s.
to the department one time for a grant under this para- 292.34 instead of reviewing the claim under this section.
graph, by a deadline set by the department.
The depart- If the claimant’s claim is denied under s.
292.34, the ment may not require the recipient of a grant under this department shall refer the claim back to the program paragraph to provide any matching funds.
under this section.
(d) Grants to municipalities to test for PFAS levels at SECTION 7.
of the statutes is amended to read:
of the statutes is locations that are owned, leased, managed, or contracted amended to read:
281.75 (7) (c) 2.
for by a municipality and where PFAS may be present, 281.75 (7) (c) 2.
Equipment used for treating the water, including a filtration device and up to 2 replacement filters;
Equipment used for treating the including airports, water systems, wastewater treatment water, including a filtration device and up to 2 replace- facilities, or contaminated lands, and to test for PFAS lev- ment filters;
S ECTION 9.
els in leachate at solid waste disposal facilities that are SECTION 8.
292.315 Municipal PFAS grant program.
owned, leased, managed, or contracted for by a munici- Senate Bill 312 − 3 − 2023 Wisconsin Act pality.
(1) D EFINITION.In this section, “PFAS” means perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), and any other perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance for which a standard has been promulgated under state or federal law.
If the property is not owned by the municipality, implementation of pollutant minimization plans;
(2) G RANTS.The department shall provide all of the following grants:
and the department may not issue a grant under this paragraph grants to municipalities for costs incurred by municipal unless the property owner has given the municipality public utilities or metropolitan sewerage districts created written consent for the municipality to enter the property under ch.
(a) Grants, provided in equal shares, to municipalities to test for PFAS levels at municipal water systems and municipal wastewater treatment facilities, or to reimburse municipalities for PFAS testing performed after applicable standards for the chemical being tested have been promulgated.
200 for pretreatment or other PFAS source and conduct testing or the ability to enter the property and reduction measures for an interconnected customer or conduct testing is permitted under an existing agreement other regular customer if the costs incurred are less than between the property owner and the municipality.
The department may not require the recipient of a grant under this paragraph to submit an application for a grant or provide any matching funds.
The the costs of the upgrades otherwise required at the end- department may not provide a grant under this paragraph point treatment facility and if the costs are approved by to test for PFAS in a water system or wastewater treat- the governing body of the municipality or the metropoli- ment facility if the applicant has received a grant under par.
(b) Grants, provided in equal shares not to exceed $1,800, to entities that are not municipalities and that are regulated as public water systems for the entity to test its drinking water supply for PFAS if required to do so by the department, or for reimbursement to the entity for PFAS testing performed after applicable standards - 2024 Legislature - 10 - LRB-2936/1 MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SENATE BILL 312 S ECTION 9 for the chemical being tested have been promulgated.
(a), unless the applicant demonstrates that it has used tan sewerage district.
An entity that is not a municipality may apply to the department one time for a grant under this paragraph, by a deadline set by the department.
No municipality may receive grants under this paragraph that total more than 20 per- all of the grant funds provided to it under par.
The department may not require the recipient of a grant under this paragraph to provide any matching funds.
(c) Grants to municipalities to test for PFAS levels at locations that are owned or managed by a municipality and where PFAS may be present, including airports, water systems, wastewater treatment facilities, or contaminated lands.
The department may not provide a grant under this paragraph to test for PFAS in a water system or wastewater treatment facility if the applicant has received a grant under par.
(a), unless the applicant demonstrates that it has used all of the grant funds provided to it under par.
The department shall accept applications for grants and provide grants under this paragraph on a rolling basis.
The cent of the funding available for grants under this para- department shall accept applications for grants and pro- graph.
The department may not require the recipient of a grant under this paragraph to provide matching funds in an amount greater than 20 percent of the amount of the grant.
The department may not require the recipient of vide grants under this paragraph on a rolling basis.
(d) Grants to municipalities to dispose of PFAS-containing biosolids at facilities that accept such biosolids.
The a grant under this paragraph to provide matching funds in department may not require the recipient of a grant under an amount greater than 20 percent of the amount of the this paragraph to provide matching funds in an amount greater than 20 percent of the amount of the grant.
The department may not require the recipient of a grant under this paragraph to provide matching funds in an amount greater than 20 percent of the amount of the grant.
grant.
(e) Grants for capital costs or debt service, including for facility upgrades or new infrastructure, to municipalities that are small or disadvantaged or in which rates for water or wastewater utilities will increase by more than 20 percent as a direct result of steps taken to address PFAS contamination.
The department shall accept applications for grants and provide grants under this paragraph on a (e) Grants to municipalities and the owner or man- rolling basis.
A grant provided under this paragraph may not exceed 50 percent of the municipality's capital or debt service costs.
ager of, or the holder of a solid waste facility license (3) L IMITATIONS.
The department shall accept applications for grants and provide grants under this paragraph on a rolling basis.
(a) The department may not require issued by the department for, privately owned solid waste the recipient of a grant under sub.
LRB-2936/1 - 2024 Legislature - 11 - MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SECTION 9 SENATE BILL 312 (f) Grants to municipalities for capital costs or other costs related to PFAS that are not otherwise paid from the environmental improvement fund, including costs for addressing applicant-owned contaminated lands or costs incurred by fire departments, including to replace PFAS-containing fire fighting foam.
(2) to take action to disposal facilities to dispose of PFAS−containing biosol- address PFAS contamination unless testing demonstrates ids or leachate at facilities that accept such biosolids or leachate or to purchase and install on−site treatment sys- that PFAS levels exceed any applicable promulgated standard under state or federal law.
The department may not require the recipient of a grant under this paragraph to provide matching funds in an amount greater than 20 percent of the amount of the grant.
tems to address PFAS contained in biosolids or leachate.
The department shall accept applications for grants and provide grants under this paragraph on a rolling basis.
(b) The department may not publicly disclose the Grant moneys received under this paragraph may not be results of any PFAS testing conducted under this section used for any cost associated with landspreading.
(3) LIMITATIONS.(a) The department may not require the recipient of a grant under sub.
The unless the department notifies the grant recipient at least department may not require the recipient of a grant under this paragraph to provide matching funds in an amount 72 hours before publicly disclosing any test result.
(2) to take action to address PFAS contamination unless testing determines that PFAS levels exceed any applicable limit under state or federal law or unless another applicable state or federal law allows the department to require the grant recipient to take action.
This greater than 20 percent of the amount of the grant.
(b) The department may not publicly disclose the results of any PFAS testing conducted under this section unless the department notifies the grant recipient at least 72 hours before publicly disclosing any test result.
paragraph does not apply to any testing required or con- (f) Grants for capital costs or debt service, including ducted under ch.
S ECTION 10.
281 or 283.
S ECTION 9.
292.32 Limitations on department actions relating to PFAS.
for facility upgrades or new infrastructure, to municipali- 292.32 Limitations on department actions relat- ties that are small or disadvantaged or in which rates for ing to PFAS.
(1) DEFINITIONS.In this section:
(1) D EFINITIONS.
(a) “Brownfield property” means abandoned, idle, or underused industrial or commercial facilities or sites, the expansion or redevelopment of which is adversely affected by actual or perceived environmental contamination.
In this section:
(b) “PFAS” has the meaning given in s.
water or wastewater utilities will increase by more than percent as a direct result of steps taken to address (a) “Construction project” means a building project PFAS contamination.
A grant provided under this para- that will affect one or more parcels.
graph may not exceed 50 percent of the municipality’s (b) “PFAS” has the meaning given in s.
(c) “Public works” means the physical structures and facilities developed or acquired by a local unit of government or a federally recognized American Indian - 2024 Legislature - 12 - LRB-2936/1 MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SENATE BILL 312 S ECTION 10 tribe or band in this state to provide services and functions for the benefit and use of the public, including water, sewerage, waste disposal, utilities, and transportation.
(c) “Public works” means the physical structures and capital or debt service costs, and no municipality may facilities developed or acquired by a local unit of govern- receive grants under this paragraph that total more than percent of the funding available for grants under this ment or a federally recognized American Indian tribe or paragraph.
(2) B ROWNFIELDS.
The department shall give priority under this band in this state to provide services and functions for the paragraph to projects that are necessary to address an benefit and use of the public, including water, sewerage, exceedance of an applicable promulgated state or federal waste disposal, utilities, and transportation, and privately owned solid waste disposal facilities that accept residen- standard.
The department may not require the owner of a brownfield property to conduct testing for the presence of PFAS unless the department has information that reasonably supports the belief that the property previously had a substantial amount of uncontained PFAS.
The department shall accept applications for tial waste.
(3) C ONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.
grants and provide grants under this paragraph on a rolling basis.
The department may not prevent, delay, or otherwise impede any construction project or project of public works on the basis of a presence of PFAS contamination unless the department determines any of the following:
A municipality may submit an application (3) C ONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.
(a) The project poses a measurable risk to public health or welfare.
Notwithstanding any for a grant under this program at the same time as submit- conflicting provisions of this chapter, the department ting an application for financial assistance under s.
(b) There is a substantial risk that the project would lead to worsening environmental conditions.
may not prevent, delay, or otherwise impede any con- 281.58 or 281.61.
(c) The entity proposing to complete the project is, as a result of negligence, responsible for the original contamination.
struction project or project of public works on the basis (g) Grants to municipalities for capital costs or other of a presence of PFAS contamination unless the depart- costs related to PFAS that are not otherwise paid from the ment determines any of the following:
(4) PFAS TESTING.
environmental improvement fund, including costs for (a) The project poses a substantial risk to public addressing solid waste disposal facilities or other con- health or welfare.
In conducting testing for PFAS, the department shall comply with all of the following:
taminated lands owned, leased, managed, or contracted (b) There is a substantial risk that the project will cre- for by the municipality and costs incurred by fire depart- ate worsening environmental conditions.
(a) The department may not collect samples from lands not owned by the state without written permission from the landowner to collect samples, to test those samples, and to publicly disclose the results of that testing.
ments, including to replace PFAS−containing fire fight- (c) The entity proposing to complete the project is ing foam;
(b) The department may not publicly disclose the results of any PFAS testing conducted on samples taken from lands not owned by the state unless the department notifies the landowner of the test results at least 72 hours before publicly disclosing the test results.
grants to municipalities for the preparation and responsible for the original contamination, as a result of Wisconsin Act − 4 − 2023 Senate Bill 312 conduct that was reckless or was done with the intent to s.
LRB-2936/1 - 2024 Legislature - 13 - MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs S ECTION 10 SENATE BILL 312 (c) The department may not take any enforcement action based on the results of any PFAS testing conducted on samples taken from lands not owned by the state unless that testing determines that PFAS levels exceed any applicable limit under state or federal law or another applicable state or federal law requires the department to take enforcement action against the landowner.
160.07, or a health advisory issued by the federal envi- discharge PFAS into the environment.
(d) The department shall respond to requests from any person to conduct PFAS testing on samples taken from the person's property if funds are available to do so, if there is a reasonable belief that PFAS contamination may be present on the property, and if existing information such as public water supply testing data is not available.
ronmental protection agency.
SECTION 11.0Nonstatutory provisions.
(d) The department is specifically required under the (2) The department shall administer a program under federal Clean Water Act to prevent, delay, or otherwise which the department may provide a grant to an eligible impede the project.
(1) PORTABLE TREATMENT SYSTEM PILOT.The department of natural resources shall contract with an entity to conduct a pilot project in which surface water is partially or fully diverted to a portable treatment system and treated water is returned to the surface water.
person who owns, leases, manages, or contracts for prop- (4) PFAS TESTING ON NONSTATE LANDS.
Project activities under this subsection shall be conducted at locations with surface water with the highest concentration of perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances and where a responsible party has not been identified or the responsible party is unable to pay for remediation.
If department erty that is contaminated by PFAS;
The department of natural resources and the entity contracted under this subsection shall evaluate the success of the pilot project by conducting tests upstream and downstream of the locations where the portable treatment system is used.
to an eligible person staff or a 3rd−party entity contracted by the department that holds a department−issued solid waste facility seeks to conduct voluntary testing under this chapter for license for property that is contaminated by PFAS;
(2) R EMEDIAL ACTION AT SITES CONTAMINATED BYPFAS .
or to PFAS, all of the following shall apply:
The department of natural resources shall begin response and remedial actions at any site contaminated by perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances where a responsible - 2024 Legislature - 14 - LRB-2936/1 MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SENATE BILL 312 SECTION 11 party has not been identified or the responsible party is unable to pay for remediation.
a person who is applying on behalf of multiple eligible (a) If the department, or an entity contracted by the persons that are located in the same geographic region department, seeks to collect voluntary samples from and that will be conducting similar activities under sub.
(3) PFASTESTING COST REDUCTION.The department of natural resources and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System shall enter into a memorandum of understanding to jointly ensure that the state laboratory of hygiene reduces the costs of conducting testing for perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances by at least 10 percent on or before the first day of the 25th month after the effective date of this subsection.
lands not owned by the state based on permission from (4), if the applicant will be the entity conducting the the landowner, such permission shall be in writing, and activities under sub.
The state laboratory of hygiene shall prepare a report on its efforts to reduce the cost of testing for perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances and the timeline for receiving testing results.
(4).
The state laboratory of hygiene shall deliver the report required under this subsection to the joint committee on finance and the standing committees with jurisdiction over natural resources and the environment no later than August 31, 2025.
the department shall notify the landowner that such per- (3) All of the following are persons eligible for a mission includes the authority to collect samples, to test grant under this section:
(4) NNOCENT LANDOWNER GRANT PROGRAM.
those samples, and to publicly disclose the results of that (a) A person that spread biosolids or wastewater testing.
The department of natural resources shall provide a grant to any person who owns property that is contaminated by perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances and the person has not been identified as the responsible party for the contamination.
A landowner may revoke such permission at any residuals contaminated by PFAS in compliance with any time prior to the collection of samples.
Grants under this subsection may be used to cover costs associated with additional testing;
applicable license or permit.
environmental studies;
(b) The department may not publicly disclose the (b) A person that owns land upon which biosolids or results of any PFAS testing conducted on samples taken wastewater residuals contaminated by PFAS were spread from lands not owned by the state unless the department in compliance with any applicable license or permit.
notifies the landowner of the test results at least 72 hours (c) A fire department or municipality that responded before publicly disclosing the test results.
to emergencies that required the use of PFAS or that con- (4m) E NFORCEMENT ACTIONS ON NONSTATE LANDS.
ducted training for such emergencies in compliance with The department may not commence any enforcement applicable federal regulations.
action against any person that meets the eligibility crite- (d) A solid waste disposal facility that accepted ria for an innocent landowner grant under s.
292.34 (3) if PFAS.
the person grants permission to the department to remedi- (e) A person that owns, leases, manages, or contracts ate the land at the department’s expense.
For persons that for property on which the PFAS contamination did not are not eligible for an innocent landowner grant under s.
originate.
292.34 (3), the department may not commence any (f) Any other person or category of persons submit- enforcement action based on the results of PFAS testing ted as a proposed eligible person by the department to the on samples taken from lands not owned by the state joint committee on finance.
If the cochairpersons of the unless that testing demonstrates that PFAS levels exceed joint committee on finance do not notify the department any promulgated standard under state or federal law.
within 14 working days after the date the proposal is sub- This subsection does not limit the ability of a landowner mitted that the committee has scheduled a meeting to take or other authorized party to voluntarily take remedial place for the purpose of reviewing the proposal, the action based on test results collected by the department.
department shall consider the person or category of per- (5) PFAS TESTING REQUESTS.
The department shall, sons to be a person eligible for a grant under this section.
in a timely manner, respond to requests from any person If, within 14 working days after the date the proposal is to conduct PFAS testing on samples taken from the per- submitted, the cochairpersons of the joint committee on son’s property if practicable and if funds are available to finance notify the department that the committee has do so, if there is a reasonable belief that PFAS contamina- scheduled a meeting for the purpose of reviewing the pro- tion may be present on the property, and if existing infor- posal, the department may not consider the person or cat- mation such as public water supply testing data is not egory of persons to be a person eligible for a grant under available.
The department may contract with a 3rd party this section until the proposal is approved by the commit- to respond to requests for testing under this subsection.
tee.
SECTION 10.
292.34 of the statutes is created to read:
(4) Grants under this section may be used to cover 292.34 Innocent landowner grant program.
(1) costs associated with additional testing;
environmental In this section, “PFAS” has the meaning given in s.
studies;
clean drinking water supplies, including temporary potable water, filtration, or well replacement;
clean drinking water sup- 292.315 (1).
plies, including temporary potable water, filtration, well (1m) This section applies only to PFAS for which replacement, or interconnection to a municipal water there is a state or federal standard, a public health recom- supply;
legal fees;
and any other cost resulting mendation from the department of health services under from landspreading of contaminated biosolids, detection Senate Bill 312 − 5 − 2023 Wisconsin Act of groundwater contamination, or other contamination where a responsible party has not been identified or the events affecting the property.
and any other cost resulting from land spreading of contaminated biosolids by other parties, detection of groundwater contamination, or other contamination events affecting the property.
responsible party is unable to pay for remediation.
The department of natural resources shall accept applications for grants and award grants under this subsection on an ongoing basis.
The (5) The department shall accept applications for department of natural resources and the entity contracted grants and award grants under this section on a rolling under this subsection shall evaluate the success of the basis.
Grants awarded under this subsection may not exceed $250,000.
pilot project by conducting tests upstream and down- (6) Grants awarded under this section may not stream of the locations where the portable treatment sys- exceed $250,000 for each eligible person.
The department of natural resources may LRB-2936/1 - 2024 Legislature - 15 - MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs S ECTION 11 SENATE BILL 312 require the recipient of a grant under this subsection to provide matching funds in an amount greater than 20 percent of the amount of the grant.
The depart- tem is used.
(5) PFAS STUDIES AND REPORTING.
ment may require the recipient of a grant under this sec- (2) R EMEDIAL ACTION AT SITES CONTAMINATED BY tion to provide matching funds in an amount not to PFAS .
(a) In this subsection, “PFAS” means perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), and any other perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance for which a standard has been promulgated under state or federal law.
The department of natural resources may begin exceed 5 percent of the amount of the grant.
(b) The department of natural resources and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System shall enter into a memorandum of understanding to jointly do all of the following, with the assistance of other University of Wisconsin institutions, the department of natural resources, other relevant state agencies, county land and water conservation departments, and other local 3rd parties, if available:
response and remedial actions, including site investiga- SECTION 11.
1.
NR 811.12 (1) (g) 2.
Study and analyze the cost, feasibility, and effectiveness of different methods of treating PFAS before they are released into a water system or water body.
of the administra- tions, at any site contaminated by perfluoroalkyl or tive code is renumbered NR 811.12 (1) (g) 2.
(intro.) and polyfluoroalkyl substances where a responsible party has amended to read:
not been identified or where the responsible party quali- NR 811.12 (1) (g) 2.
(intro.) Test wells to be con- fies as an innocent landowner under s.
292.34.
The verted to permanent wells or test wells to be pumped at department of natural resources may contract with a 3rd a rate of 70 gallons per minute or more for a period of party to conduct response and remedial actions under this more than 72 hours All of the following test wells shall subsection.
The department of natural resources shall be approved by the department prior to their construc- prioritize response and remedial actions at sites with the tion.:
highest levels of perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl sub- SECTION 12.
NR 811.12 (1) (g) 2.
a., b.
and c.
of the stances and sites with the greatest threats to public health administrative code are created to read:
or the environment as a result of perfluoroalkyl or NR 811.12 (1) (g) 2.
a.
Test wells to be converted to polyfluoroalkyl substances.
permanent wells.
(3) PFAS TESTING LABORATORIES.
b.
Test wells to be pumped at a rate of 70 gallons per (a) The department of natural resources and the minute or more for a period of more than 72 hours.
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System c.
Test wells located in special well casing depth shall enter into a memorandum of understanding to areas that are designated by the department as special jointly ensure that the state laboratory of hygiene pro- well casing depth areas based in whole or in part on the vides guidance and other materials, conducts training, presence of perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl sub- and provides assistance to laboratories in this state that stances.
Approval under this subd.
Conduct a cost-benefit analysis of different options for disposing of biosolids or sludge that contains or may contain PFAS.
c.
3.
shall include are certified under s.
Study and analyze the cost, feasibility, and effectiveness of different destruction and disposal methods for PFAS.
299.11 (7) to test for contaminants review and approval of specifications and plans relating other than perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances to drilling, well casing, and filling and sealing.
4.
to become certified under s.
Study and analyze the migration of PFAS into the bay of Green Bay, including where the PFAS are entering the bay and what effects PFAS may have in the bay.
299.11 (7) to test for perfluo- SECTION 13.
5.
PSC 184.06 of the administrative code roalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances, and to assist labo- is amended to read:
Create a comprehensive, interactive map showing all available PFAS testing data and whether each data point on the map exceeds any applicable state or federal - 2024 Legislature - 16 - LRB-2936/1 MP/ZW/ES/SWB:skw&cjs SENATE BILL 312 SECTION 11 standard for PFAS.
ratories in this state that are certified under s.
Such data may not contain any personally identifiable information unless the entity to which the data applies is required to test and disclose its results under state or federal law.
299.11 (7) PSC 184.06 Emergency work.
(c) The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System shall require the University of Wisconsin-Madison division of extension to provide the map and reports on the studies required under this subsection to the joint committee on finance and the standing committees with jurisdiction over natural resources and the environment no later than 2 years after the effective date of this paragraph.
In case of an emer- to test for perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances in gency resulting from the failure of power supply or from reducing the costs of such testing and shortening the fire, storm, or similar events, a utility may begin neces- timeline for receiving such testing results.
(6) REPORTS TO LEGISLATURE ON PROGRESS UNDER THIS ACT.For a period of 3 years after the effective date of this subsection, the department of natural resources shall, every 6 months, submit a report to the join committee on finance and the to the standing committees with jurisdiction over natural resources and the environment.
sary repair work without receiving prior commission (b) The Board of Regents of the University of Wis- authorization.
The first report under this subsection shall be submitted no later than 6 months after the effective date of this subsection.
Incaseofanemergency resulting from the consin System, in coordination with the department of contamination of water supply, a utility may begin neces- natural resources, may provide grants to laboratories in sary repair, temporary treatment, or other emergency this state that are certified under s.
The report shall include a detailed description of the department's expenditures under this act and a detailed description of the department's progress in implementing the provisions of this act.
299.11 (7) to test for work to address the issue without receiving prior com- perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances, or that are mission authorization.
(7) PFAS TESTING.
The utility shall promptly notify seeking such certification, to assist with the cost of pur- the commission of the emergency work and shall, within chasing equipment necessary for testing for perfluo- days after commencing the work, furnish the commis- roalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances.
In the 2023-25 fiscal biennium, the department of natural resources shall conduct additional PFAS testing activities.
A grant under this sion with the information required under s.
(8) FIRE FIGHTING FOAM.
PSC 184.04 paragraph may not exceed 40 percent of the cost of such (3).
The department of natural resources shall survey or resurvey local fire departments about their use and possession of PFAS-containing fire fighting foam, send communications and information regarding such foam, and contract with a 3rd party to collect such foam.
equipment.
(END)
All laboratories in this state that are certified SECTION 14.
Nonstatutory provisions.
under s.
299.11 (7) to test for perfluoroalkyl or polyfluo- (1) PORTABLE TREATMENT SYSTEM PILOT.
The depart- roalkyl substances, or that are seeking such certification, ment of natural resources shall contract with an entity to shall be given equal opportunity to receive a grant under conduct a pilot project in which surface water is partially this paragraph.
or fully diverted to a portable treatment system and (c) The state laboratory of hygiene shall prepare a treated water is returned to the surface water.
Project report onitsefforts under this subsection and shall deliver activities under this subsection shall be conducted at the report to the joint committee on finance and the stand- locations with surface water with the highest concentra- ing committees with jurisdiction over natural resources tion of perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances and and the environment no later than August 31, 2025.
Wisconsin Act − 6 − 2023 Senate Bill 312 (4) PFAS STUDIES AND REPORTING.
contain any personally identifiable information unless (a) In this subsection, “PFAS” has the meaning given the entity to which the data applies is a municipal entity in s.
292.315 (1).
that is required to test and disclose its results under ch.
(b) The department of natural resources and the 281 or 283.
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System 8.
Conduct any additional studies related to PFAS, as shall enter into a memorandum of understanding to approved by the joint committee on finance.
jointly do all of the following, with the assistance of Uni- (c) The Board of Regents of the University of Wis- versity of Wisconsin institutions, the department of natu- consin System shall require the University ofWisconsin− ral resources and other relevant state agencies, county Madison division of extension to provide the map and land and water conservation departments, and local 3rd reports on the studies required under this subsection to parties, if available:
the joint committee on finance and the standing commit- 1.
Study and analyze the cost, feasibility, and effec- tees with jurisdiction over natural resources and the envi- tiveness of different methods of treating PFAS before ronment no later than 2 years after the effective date of they are released into a water system or water body.
this paragraph.
2.
Conduct a cost−benefit analysis of different (5) REPORTSTOLEGISLATUREONPROGRESSUNDERTHIS options for disposing of biosolids or sludge that contains ACT.
For a period of 3 years after the effective date of this or may contain PFAS.
subsection, the department of natural resources shall, 3.
Study and analyze the cost, feasibility, and effec- every 6 months, submit a report to the joint committee on tiveness ofdifferent destruction and disposal methods for finance and to the standing committees with jurisdiction PFAS.
over natural resources and the environment.
The first 4.
For sites contaminated by PFAS, in consultation report under this subsection shall be submitted no later with persons who are able and qualified to conduct envi- than 6 months after the effective date of this subsection.
ronmental remediation in this state, study and analyze the The report shall include a detailed description of the cost, feasibility, and effectiveness of different methods department’s expenditures under this act and a detailed for remediating PFAS that leave the contaminated description of the department’s progress in implementing medium in place and methods that remove the contami- the provisions of this act.
nated medium.
(6) PFAS TESTING.
In the 2023−25 fiscal biennium, 5.
Study and analyze the migration of PFAS into the the department of natural resources shall conduct addi- bay of Green Bay, including where the PFAS are entering tional voluntary PFAS testing activities.
the bay and what effects PFAS may have in the bay.
(7) F IRE FIGHTING FOAM.
The department of natural 6.
Study and analyze the migration of PFAS into the resources shall survey or resurvey local fire departments Wisconsin River and its tributaries and the Mississippi about their use and possession of PFAS−containing fire River and its tributaries, including where the PFAS are fighting foam, send communications and information entering surface waters and unconfined groundwater and regarding such foam, and contract with a 3rd party to vol- what effects PFAS may have in those rivers.
untarily collect such foam.
7.
Create a comprehensive, interactive map showing SECTION 15.0Effective dates.
This act takes effect on all available PFAS testing data and whether each data the day after publication, except as follows:
point on the map exceeds any applicable promulgated (1) A DMINISTRATIVE RULES.
The treatment of admin- state or federal standard for PFAS.
Such data may not istrative rules takes effect as provided in s.
227.265.
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  2. Placed on calendar 5-15-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  3. Received from Senate passed notwithstanding the objections of the Governor

  4. Messaged

  5. Passed notwithstanding the objections of the Governor, Ayes 22, Noes 9

  6. Rules suspended and taken up

  7. Placed on calendar 5-14-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  8. Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-9-2024

  9. Presented to the Governor on 4-4-2024

  10. Report correctly enrolled

  11. Received from Assembly concurred in

  12. Ordered immediately messaged

  13. Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 62, Noes 35

  14. Rules suspended

  15. Ordered to a third reading

  16. Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 35

  17. Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Shankland and Billings

  18. Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 35

  19. Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representatives Shankland and Billings

  20. Read a second time

  21. Made a special order of business at 10:13 AM on 2-22-2024 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28

  22. Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  23. LRB correction

  24. Received from Senate

  25. Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Passed, Ayes 22, Noes 11

  27. Read a third time

  28. Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  29. Ordered to a third reading

  30. Senate Substitute Amendment 2 adopted

  31. Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 2 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 10

  32. Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 2 adopted

  33. Read a second time

  34. Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Senators Pfaff, Wirch, Hesselbein, Agard, Carpenter, L. Johnson, Larson, Smith, Spreitzer and Taylor

  35. Placed on the foot of the 14th order of business on the calendar of 11-14-2023

  36. Senate Substitute Amendment 3 offered by Senators Pfaff, Wirch, Hesselbein, Agard, Carpenter, L. Johnson, Larson, Smith, Spreitzer and Taylor

  37. Placed on calendar 11-14-2023 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  38. Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Senators Wimberger and Cowles

  39. Available for scheduling

  40. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  41. Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  42. Executive action taken

  43. Senate Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Senators Wimberger and Cowles

  44. Senator Knodl added as a coauthor

  45. Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Wimberger and Cowles

  46. Public hearing held

  47. Read first time and referred to Committee on Natural Resources and Energy

  48. Introduced by Senators Wimberger, Cowles, Ballweg, Cabral-Guevara, Felzkowski, Feyen, Nass and Quinn; cosponsored by Representatives Mursau, Swearingen, Behnke, Binsfeld, Dittrich, Donovan, Green, Kitchens, Moses, O'Connor, Snyder, Spiros, Steffen, Summerfield and Wittke

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

8 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 124 not signed on · 34 voted No

Sponsors (8)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (124)

124 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 124 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 22 Yea · 9 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3200
Republican 19000
Democrat 0701
Total 22901
% of votes cast 69%28%0%3%
How each member voted (32)
Member Party Vote
BALLWEG — Yea
STROEBEL — Yea
COWLES — Yea
AGARD — Nay
JOHNSON — Nay
Carpenter, Tim Democrat Nay
Hesselbein, Dianne Democrat Nay
Larson, Chris Democrat Nay
Pfaff, Brad Democrat Nay
Roys, Kelda Democrat Not Voting
Smith, Jeff Democrat Nay
Spreitzer, Mark Democrat Nay
Wirch, Robert Democrat Nay
Bradley, Julian Republican Yea
Cabral-Guevara, Rachael Republican Yea
Felzkowski, Mary Republican Yea
Feyen, Dan Republican Yea
Hutton, Rob Republican Yea
Jacque, André Republican Yea
Jagler, John Republican Yea
James, Jesse Republican Yea
Kapenga, Chris Republican Yea
Knodl, Daniel Republican Yea
LeMahieu, Devin Republican Yea
Marklein, Howard Republican Yea
Nass, Steve Republican Yea
Quinn, Romaine Republican Yea
Stafsholt, Rob Republican Yea
Testin, Patrick Republican Yea
Tomczyk, Cory Republican Yea
Wanggaard, Van Republican Yea
Wimberger, Eric Republican Yea

Official roll call →

CONCURRENCE

Passed 62 Yea · 35 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 45000
Democrat 02400
Unaffiliated 171100
Total 623500
% of votes cast 64%36%0%0%
How each member voted (97)
Member Party Vote
BALDEH — Nay
BINSFELD — Yea
BODDEN — Yea
BRANDTJEN — Yea
CABRERA — Nay
CONLEY — Nay
CONSIDINE — Nay
EDMING — Yea
GOYKE — Nay
JOHNSON — Yea
KATSMA — Yea
MAGNAFICI — Yea
MICHALSKI — Yea
MYERS — Nay
OHNSTAD — Nay
OLDENBURG — Yea
PETRYK — Yea
PLUMER — Yea
RETTINGER — Yea
RIEMER — Nay
ROZAR — Yea
SCHMIDT — Yea
SCHRAA — Yea
SCHUTT — Yea
SHANKLAND — Nay
SHELTON — Nay
SPEAKER — Yea
ANDERSON, J — Nay
Anderson, Clinton Democrat Nay
Andraca, Deb Democrat Nay
Bare, Mike Democrat Nay
Billings, Jill Democrat Nay
Clancy, Ryan Democrat Nay
Doyle, Steve Democrat Nay
Drake, Dora Democrat Nay
Emerson, Jodi Democrat Nay
Haywood, Kalan Democrat Nay
Hong, Francesca Democrat Nay
Jacobson, Jenna Democrat Nay
Joers, Alex Democrat Nay
Madison, Darrin Democrat Nay
McGuire, Tip Democrat Nay
Moore Omokunde, Supreme Democrat Nay
Neubauer, Greta Democrat Nay
Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia Democrat Nay
Palmeri, Lori Democrat Nay
Ratcliff, Melissa Democrat Nay
Sinicki, Christine Democrat Nay
Snodgrass, Lee Democrat Nay
Stubbs, Shelia Democrat Nay
Subeck, Lisa Democrat Nay
Vining, Robyn Democrat Nay
Allen, Scott Republican Yea
Armstrong, David Republican Yea
August, Tyler Republican Yea
Behnke, Elijah Republican Yea
Born, Mark Republican Yea
Brooks, Robert Republican Yea
Callahan, Calvin Republican Yea
Dallman, Alex Republican Yea
Dittrich, Barbara Republican Yea
Donovan, Bob Republican Yea
Duchow, Cindi Republican Yea
Goeben, Joy Republican Yea
Green, Chanz Republican Yea
Gundrum, Rick Republican Yea
Gustafson, Nate Republican Yea
Hurd, Karen Republican Yea
Kitchens, Joel Republican Yea
Krug, Scott Republican Yea
Kurtz, Tony Republican Yea
Maxey, Dave Republican Yea
Melotik, Paul Republican Yea
Moses, Clint Republican Yea
Murphy, David Republican Yea
Mursau, Jeffrey Republican Yea
Nedweski, Amanda Republican Yea
Neylon, Adam Republican Yea
Novak, Todd Republican Yea
O'Connor, Jerry Republican Yea
Penterman, William Republican Yea
Petersen, Kevin Republican Yea
Pronschinske, Treig Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Yea
Snyder, Patrick Republican Yea
Sortwell, Shae Republican Yea
Spiros, John Republican Yea
Steffen, David Republican Yea
Summerfield, Rob Republican Yea
Swearingen, Rob Republican Yea
Tittl, Paul Republican Yea
Tranel, Travis Republican Yea
Tusler, Ron Republican Yea
VanderMeer, Nancy Republican Yea
Wichgers, Chuck Republican Yea
Wittke, Robert Republican Yea
Zimmerman, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

PASSAGE

Passed 22 Yea · 11 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3200
Republican 19000
Democrat 0900
Total 221100
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (33)
Member Party Vote
BALLWEG — Yea
STROEBEL — Yea
COWLES — Yea
AGARD — Nay
JOHNSON — Nay
Carpenter, Tim Democrat Nay
Hesselbein, Dianne Democrat Nay
Larson, Chris Democrat Nay
Pfaff, Brad Democrat Nay
Roys, Kelda Democrat Nay
Smith, Jeff Democrat Nay
Spreitzer, Mark Democrat Nay
Taylor, Sequanna Democrat Nay
Wirch, Robert Democrat Nay
Bradley, Julian Republican Yea
Cabral-Guevara, Rachael Republican Yea
Felzkowski, Mary Republican Yea
Feyen, Dan Republican Yea
Hutton, Rob Republican Yea
Jacque, André Republican Yea
Jagler, John Republican Yea
James, Jesse Republican Yea
Kapenga, Chris Republican Yea
Knodl, Daniel Republican Yea
LeMahieu, Devin Republican Yea
Marklein, Howard Republican Yea
Nass, Steve Republican Yea
Quinn, Romaine Republican Yea
Stafsholt, Rob Republican Yea
Testin, Patrick Republican Yea
Tomczyk, Cory Republican Yea
Wanggaard, Van Republican Yea
Wimberger, Eric Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 312?
SB 312 is sponsored by Wimberger, Eric (Republican), Cowles, Ballweg, Cabral-Guevara, Rachael (Republican), Felzkowski, Mary (Republican), Feyen, Dan (Republican), Nass, Steve (Republican), and Quinn, Romaine (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 312?
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 312?
Track SB 312 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 312

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 312

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →