Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 R cosponsors

SB 892 — Relating to: preemption of certain local animal ordinances.

Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

74 added · 11 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to SB 892 changes how local governments can regulate animal facilities in agricultural zones. Specifically, it clarifies that local municipalities can still use their zoning authority and enforce existing state laws related to livestock facilities. This is important because it allows for some level of local oversight while still limiting the ability of these subdivisions to impose stricter animal welfare standards than those set by state law. Overall, it striking a balance between state regulations and local interests in managing animal facilities effectively.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2024 LEGISLATURE LRBa1361/1 JAM:skw SENATE AMENDMENT 1, TO SENATE BILL 892 March 4, 2024 - Offered by Senator UINN.
- 2024 LEGISLATURE LRB-5419/1 JAM:cdc SENATE BILL 892 January 5, 2024 - Introduced by Senator Q UINN, cosponsored by Representatives P RONSCHINSKE , DALLMAN , A RMSTRONG , BEHNKE , O C ONNOR , SCHMIDT and W ICHGERS .
At the locations indicated, amend the bill as follows:
Referred to Committee on Agriculture and Tourism.
1.
A N A CT to create 173.90 of the statutes;
Page 3, line 9:
relating to:
delete lines 9 and 10 and substitute “political subdivision's authority to use its zoning authority or power or to enforce the provisions of this chapter, s.
preemption of certain local animal ordinances.
59.69, 60.61, 60.62, 61.35, or 62.23, or ch.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Current law specifies animal welfare standards for persons responsible for confining animals, including requirements to provide such animals with sufficient food and water and standards for providing proper shelter.
174, or any provisions under state law relating to livestock facilities.".
Current law also identifies and prohibits a number of crimes against animals and requires rabies vaccinations and local dog licenses and tags for dogs.
Under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) may appoint humane officers who may, in addition to law enforcement officers, investigate and enforce these state laws as well as local ordinances relating to animals.
This bill prohibits political subdivisions from adopting certain regulations for animal facilities in areas that are zoned exclusively or primarily for agricultural use, unless the activity being regulated presents a substantial threat to public health or safety.
Specifically, the bill prohibits political subdivisions from establishing animal welfare standards that are more stringent than those contained in state law or from requiring or prohibiting animal medications or vaccinations that are not otherwise required or prohibited under state law.
The bill also prohibits political subdivisions from regulating the use to which an animal will be put, either on a farm or facility or after it leaves the farm or facility.
In addition, under the bill, political subdivisions may not regulate the species of animals that are allowed to be raised within an area that is zoned exclusively or primarily for agricultural use.
Under the bill, a political subdivision may not enforce any existing regulations that conflict with the - 2024 Legislature - 2 - LRB-5419/1 JAM:cdc SENATE BILL 892 provisions of the bill, unless the activity being regulated presents a substantial threat to public health or safety.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
173.90 of the statutes is created to read:
173.90 Preemption of local animal regulations.
(1) D EFINITIONS.In this section:
(a) “Animal” has the meaning given in s.
951.01 (1).
(b) “Animal facility” means a farm or other commercial operation that raises or confines animals as a commercial enterprise.
(2) P ROHIBITIONS.
A political subdivision may not, by ordinance, resolution, order, or otherwise, do any of the following to regulate an animal facility in an area that is zoned exclusively or primarily for agricultural use, unless the activity affected by the ordinance, resolution, or order presents a substantial threat to public health or safety or unless otherwise specifically authorized:
(a) Animal welfare standards.
Establish animal welfare standards that are more stringent that those in ss.
951.13 and 951.14 or in any rules promulgated by the department.
(b) Medications and vaccinations.
Require or prohibit any medications or vaccinations that are not required or prohibited under ch.
95 or under any rules promulgated by the department.
(c) Use of animals.
Limit the use to which an animal may be put while in an animal facility or after it leaves an animal facility, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, s.
944.18, chs.
174 and 951, and any rules promulgated by the department.
LRB-5419/1 - 2024 Legislature - 3 - JAM:cdc SECTION 1 SENATE BILL 892 (d) Species of animals.
Limit the species of animals that may be raised or kept in an area zoned exclusively or primarily for agricultural use.
(3) EXISTING REGULATIONS.
If a political subdivision has in effect on the effective date of this subsection ....
[LRB inserts date], an ordinance, resolution, or order that conflicts with sub.
(2), the ordinance, resolution, or order does not apply and may not be enforced, unless the activity affected by the ordinance, resolution, or order presents a substantial threat to public health or safety.
(4) C ONSTRUCTION.
Show all 45 changed rows (5 more)
Previous
Latest
Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting a political subdivision's authority to enforce the provisions of this chapter, s.
59.69, or ch.
174 or any provisions under state law relating to animal feeding operations.
SECTION 2.Effective date.
(1) This act takes effect on the 90th day after publication.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Available for scheduling

  3. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Sporting Heritage, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  4. Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Sporting Heritage, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  5. Executive action taken

  6. Public hearing held

  7. Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Quinn

  8. Withdrawn from committee on Agriculture and Tourism and rereferred to committee on Financial Institutions and Sporting Heritage pursuant to Senate Rule 46(2)(c)

  9. Senator Testin added as a coauthor

  10. Representative Behnke withdrawn as a cosponsor

  11. Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture and Tourism

  12. Introduced by Senator Quinn; cosponsored by Representatives Pronschinske, Dallman, Armstrong, Behnke, O'Connor, Schmidt and Wichgers

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 131 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (131)

131 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 131 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 892?
SB 892 is sponsored by Quinn, Romaine (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 892?
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 892?
Track SB 892 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 892

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 892

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →