Relating to: public records identifying confidential law enforcement informants.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 119 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 119.
You're tracking SB 119
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 119 — Relating to: public records identifying confidential law enforcement informants.
Last action — Published 3-28-2024
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 08, 2023. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Tony Evers (Democratic) on March 28, 2024.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
7 sponsors
7 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (4 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
61 added · 11 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Senate Bill 119 broadens the protection of confidential law enforcement informants by extending nondisclosure rules to any official or body covered by public records law, not just law enforcement agencies. Previously, only law enforcement agencies had to keep informants' identities private, but now this requirement applies more broadly. This change is important because it enhances the protection of confidential sources across various governmental bodies, potentially encouraging more individuals to provide information without fear of exposure.
- 2024 LEGISLATURE LRBa0396/1LRB-1463/1 MPG:amnMPG:skw SENATE AMENDMENT 1, TO SENATE BILL 119 SeptemberMarch 26,8, 2023 - OfferedIntroduced by SenatoANGGAARD.SenatorsANGGAARD , WIRCH, COWLES, ELZKOWSKI , JAMES, MARKLEIN and SPREITZER, cosponsored by RepresentativesEDWESKI , M CGUIRE, O HNSTAD, C .
AtANDERSON the, locationsJ. indicated, amend the bill as follows:
1.A NDERSON, C ONSIDINE, DITTRICH, D ONOVAN, EDMING , EMERSON , JOERS, K ITCHENS, M URPHY , M URSAU , O RTIZVELEZ, R ETTINGER, SINICK, SPIROS, STUBBS, S UBECK and T USLER.
PageReferred 2,to lineCommittee 21:on Judiciary and Public Safety.
deleteA linesN 21A andCT 22to amend 19.36 (8) (b) and substitute59.20 “as(3) authorized(a) inof par.the statutes;
relating to:
public records identifying confidential law enforcement informants.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Current law prohibits a law enforcement agency from disclosing records or parts of records in response to a public records request that, if disclosed, would identify a confidential informant of a law enforcement agency.
Current law provides an exception to that nondisclosure requirement if the records custodian determines that the public interest in disclosing the record outweighs the harm done to the public interest by providing access to the record.
This bill extends that nondisclosure requirement concerning the personally identifiable information of confidential law enforcement informants to records or parts of records maintained by any official or body subject to the public records law, not just law enforcement agencies.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
19.36 (8) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
19.36(8) (b) If an authority that is a law enforcement agency receives a request to inspect or copy a record or portion of a record under s.
19.35 (1) (a) that contains - 2024 Legislature - 2 - LRB-1463/1 MPG:skw SENATE BILL 119 SECTION 1 specific information including but not limited to a name, address, telephone number, voice recording, handwriting sample which that, if disclosed, would identify an informant, the authority shall delete the portion of the record in which the information is contained or, if no portion of the record can be inspected or copied without identifying the informant, shall withhold the record unless the legal custodian of the record, designated under s.
19.33, makes a determination, at the time that the request is made, that the public interest in allowing a person to inspect, copy or receive a copy of such identifying information outweighs the harm done to the public interest by providing such access.
SECTION 2.
59.20 (3) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
59.20(3) (a) Every sheriff, clerk of the circuit court, register of deeds, treasurer, comptroller, register of probate, clerk, and county surveyor shall keep his or her office at the county seat in the offices provided by the county or by special provision of law;
or if there is none, then at such place as the board directs.
The board may also require any elective or appointive county official to keep his or her office at the county seat in an office to be provided by the county.
All such officers shall keep their offices open during the usual business hours of any day except Sunday, as the board directs.
With proper care, the officers shall open to the examination of any person all books and papers required to be kept in his or her office and permit any person so examining to take notes and copies of such books, records, papers, or minutes therefrom except as authorized in par.
19.3619(10), (10) and (11) and 19.59 (3) (d) or under ch.
6969. and except as authorized in s.
19.36SECTION (8)3.0Initial toapplicability. the extent the books, records, papers, or minutes contain information that would identify an informant as such.”.
LRB-1463/1 - 2024 Legislature - 3 - MPG:skw SECTION 3 SENATE BILL 119 (1) This act first applies to a public records request pending with an authority on the effective date of this subsection.
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Published 3-28-2024
-
Report approved by the Governor on 3-27-2024. 2023 Wisconsin Act 223
-
Presented to the Governor on 3-21-2024
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
-
Representative O'Connor added as a cosponsor
-
Placed on calendar 2-15-2024 by Committee on Rules
-
Representative Gustafson added as a cosponsor
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 10-17-2023 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 7, Noes 0
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 7, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Wanggaard
-
Representative Jacobson added as a cosponsor
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
-
Introduced by Senators Wanggaard, Wirch, Cowles, Felzkowski, James, Marklein and Spreitzer; cosponsored by Representatives Nedweski, McGuire, Ohnstad, C. Anderson, J. Anderson, Considine, Dittrich, Donovan, Edming, Emerson, Joers, Kitchens, Murphy, Mursau, Ortiz-Velez, Rettinger, Sinicki, Spiros, Stubbs, Subeck and Tusler
Sponsors
- Van Wanggaard · Primary
- Robert Wirch · Primary
- Cowles · Primary
- Mary Felzkowski · Primary
- Jesse James · Primary
- Howard Marklein · Primary
- Mark Spreitzer · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 125 not signed on
Sponsors (7)
- Wanggaard, Van Republican
- Wirch, Robert Democrat
- Cowles
- Felzkowski, Mary Republican
- James, Jesse Republican
- Marklein, Howard Republican
- Spreitzer, Mark Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (125)
125 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 125 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 119?
- SB 119 is sponsored by Wanggaard, Van (Republican), Wirch, Robert (Democrat), Cowles, Felzkowski, Mary (Republican), James, Jesse (Republican), Marklein, Howard (Republican), and Spreitzer, Mark (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 119?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 08, 2023. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 119?
- Track SB 119 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 119
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 119
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →