Relating to: the use of videoconferencing technology in certain civil actions. (FE)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 560 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 560.
You're tracking AB 560
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 560 — Relating to: the use of videoconferencing technology in certain civil actions. (FE)
Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Representative Krug added as a coauthor
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Representatives Gustafson and O'Connor added as coauthors
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Placed on calendar 11-14-2023 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage recommended by Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Prevention, Ayes 8, Noes 4
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Representative Subeck added as a coauthor
-
Withdrawn from committee on Judiciary and referred to committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Prevention pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Introduced by Representatives Novak, Brandtjen, Donovan, Kitchens, Michalski, Murphy and Schmidt; cosponsored by Senators James, Ballweg and Marklein
Sponsors
- Todd Novak · Primary
- Brandtjen · Primary
- Bob Donovan · Primary
- Joel Kitchens · Primary
- Michalski · Primary
- David Murphy · Primary
- Schmidt · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 125 not signed on
Sponsors (7)
- Novak, Todd Republican
- Brandtjen
- Donovan, Bob Republican
- Kitchens, Joel Republican
- Michalski
- Murphy, David Republican
- Schmidt
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (125)
125 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 125 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 560?
- AB 560 is sponsored by Novak, Todd (Republican), Brandtjen, Donovan, Bob (Republican), Kitchens, Joel (Republican), Michalski, Murphy, David (Republican), and Schmidt.
- What is the current status of AB 560?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 560?
- Track AB 560 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 560
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 560
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →