AB 511 — Relating to: permits for certain oversize or overweight vehicles transporting forest products. (FE)
Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
100 added · 27 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Assembly Bill 511 expands the routes available for oversize or overweight vehicles transporting forest products by adding specific highway segments to the Michigan border permit. This means that vehicles can now legally travel on more roads to transport forest products, which could improve access and efficiency for businesses in that sector. Overall, these changes aim to support the forest products industry while ensuring that transportation routes are clearly defined and regulated.
- 2024 LEGISLATURE LRBa0875/1LRB-3750/3 EVM:cdcEVM:skw ASSEMBLY AMENDMENTBILL 1,511 TOOctober ASSEMBLY18, BILL2023 511- JanuaryIntroduced 4,by 2024Representatives -M OfferedURSAU , ALLAHAN , EDMING, G USTAFSON, GREEN , MAGNAFICI, MICHALSK, O'CONNOR , CHMIDT , NYDER and SWEARINGEN , cosponsored by RepresentativeURSAU.Senators TOMCZYK , B ALLWEG , C OWLES, F ELZKOWSKI, Q UINN, T ESTIN and N ASS.
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendTransportation. the bill as follows:
A N A CT to amend 348.27 (9) (a) 3.
g.
and 348.27 (9) (a) 3.
n.;
and to create 348.27 (9) (a) 3.
gm., 348.27 (9) (a) 3.
hm., 348.27 (9) (a) 3.
o., 348.27 (9) (a) 3.
p., 348.27 (9) (a) 3.
q., 348.27 (9) (a) 3.
r., 348.27 (9) (a) 3.
s.
and 348.27 (9) (a) 3.
t.
of the statutes;
relating to:
permits for certain oversize or overweight vehicles transporting forest products.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under current law, with limited exceptions, no person may operate on a highway any vehicle or combination of vehicles that exceeds certain statutory limits on size, weight, or load unless that person possesses a permit issued by the Department of Transportation.
Currently, DOT may issue an annual or consecutive month permit for an oversize or overweight vehicle to transport loads within 11 miles of the Wisconsin-Michigan state line and on specifically designated highways, if the vehicle does not violate length or weight limitations under Michigan law (commonly known as the Michigan border permit).
This bill adds the following highway segments to the Michigan border permit:
PageSTH 2,70, linefrom 12:the junction with westbound STH 139 in Florence County to the junction with STH 13 in the town of Fifield.
after2. that line insert:
“SECTIONSTH 3g.54, from the junction with CTH S in Outagamie County to the junction with STH 55 in the town of Oneida in Outagamie County.
3.
STH 32, from the junction with STH 64 in Oconto County to Cottonwood Lane three-quarters of a mile southeast of the village of Suring.
- 2024 Legislature - 2 - LRB-3750/3 EVM:skw ASSEMBLY BILL 511 4.
STH 17, from the junction with STH 70 in the city of Eagle River to the junction with Sundstein Road in Vilas County.
5.
STH 13, from the junction with STH 70 in the town of Fifield in Price County to the junction with 5th Street in the city of Park Falls.
6.
STH 13, from the intersection with Old Airport Road to the northernmost intersection with CTH “C” in Ashland County.
7.
USH 63, from the junction with USH 2 in Bayfield County to the junction with Krueger Road in the town of Bass Lake in Sawyer County.
8.
STH 22, from the junction with USH 41 in the city of Oconto to the junction with STH 47/55 in the city of Shawano.
9.
STH 55, from the junction of STH 47/55 with STH 22 in the city of Shawano to the junction with USH 151 in Calumet County.
10.
Show all 120 changed lines (80 more)
USH 151, from the junction with STH 55 in Calumet County to the junction with CTH S in Manitowoc County.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
k.g.
k.g.
USHSTH 141,13, from the villagejunction of CrivitzUSH in2 Marinetteand CountySTH to13 in the junctioncity of USHAshland 141to andthe CTHnorthernmost Sintersection USHof 41STH in13 theand townOld ofAirport AbramsRoad CTH “C” in OcontoAshland County.
SECTIONS 3s.ECTION 2.
L.gm.
of the statutes is created to read:
348.27 (9) (a) 3.
gm.
STH 13, from the junction of STH 13 and STH 70 in the town of Fifield in Price County to the junction of STH 13 and 5th Street S in the city of Park Falls.
S ECTION 3.
348.27 (9) (a) 3.
hm.
of the statutes is created to read:
348.27 (9) (a) 3.
hm.
STH 70, from the junction of STH 70 and westbound STH 139 in Florence County to the junction of STH 70 and STH 13 in the town of Fifield in Price County.
S ECTION 4.
348.27 (9) (a) 3.
n.
LRB-3750/3 - 2024 Legislature - 3 - EVM:skw SECTION 4 ASSEMBLY BILL 511 348.27 (9) (a) 3.
n.
STH 54, from the junction of STH 54 and USH 45 in the city of New London to the junction of STH 54 and CTH S STH 55 in the town of Oneida in Outagamie County.
SECTION 5.
L.o.
USH 41, from the junction of USH 41 and CTH “S” in the townstatutes ofis Abramscreated Little Suamico in Oconto County to theread: city of Marinette.”.
2.
Page 3, line 6:
delete lines 6 and 7 and substitute “County to the westernmost junction of STH 32 and STH 22 in the city of Gillett.”.
3.
Page 3, line 7:
after that line insert:
“SECTION 5m.
om.o.
STH 32, from the junction of STH 32 and STH 64 in Oconto County to Cottonwood Lane three-quarters of a mile southeast of the village of Suring.
SECTION 6.
348.27 (9) (a) 3.
p.
LRBa0875/1 - 2024 Legislature - 2 - EVM:cdc 348.27(9) (a) 3.
om.
STH 32, from the easternmost junction of STH 32 and STH 22 to the junction of STH 32 and STH 160 in the village of Pulaski.”.
4.
Page 3, line 25:
after that line insert:
“SECTION 10m.
u.p.
STH 17, from the junction of STH 17 and STH 70 in the city of Eagle River to the junction of STH 17 and Sundstein Road in Vilas County.
SECTION 7.
348.27 (9) (a) 3.
q.
u.q.
STHUSH 160,63, from the junction of STHUSH 16063 and STHUSH 322 in Bayfield County to the villagejunction of PulaskiUSH to63 and Kruger Road in the junctiontown of STHBass 160Lake andin STHSawyer 55.”.County.
SECTION 8.
348.27 (9) (a) 3.
r.
of the statutes is created to read:
348.27 (9) (a) 3.
r.
STH 22, from the junction of STH 22 and USH 41 in the city of Oconto to the easternmost junction of STH 22 and STH 47/55 in the city of Shawano.
SECTION 9.
348.27 (9) (a) 3.
s.
of the statutes is created to read:
348.27 (9) (a) 3.
s.
STH 55, from the easternmost junction of STH 47/55 and STH 22 in the city of Shawano to the junction of STH 55 and USH 151 in Calumet County.
SECTION 10.
348.27 (9) (a) 3.
t.
of the statutes is created to read:
348.27 (9) (a) 3.
t.
USH 151, from the junction of USH 151 and STH 55 in Calumet County to the junction of USH 151 and CTH S in Manitowoc County.
- 2024 Legislature - 4 - LRB-3750/3 EVM:skw ASSEMBLY BILL 511 SECTION 11 SECTION 11.Nonstatutory provisions.
(1) Notwithstanding s.
13.096 (2), the department of transportation may not prepare a report on this bill under s.
13.096 (2) and (3).
Show all 120 changed rows (80 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Available for scheduling
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 1-18-2024 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0
-
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Mursau
-
Representative Callahan withdrawn as a coauthor
-
Senator Felzkowski withdrawn as a cosponsor
-
Representative Green withdrawn as a coauthor
-
Public hearing held
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation
-
Introduced by Representatives Mursau, Callahan, Edming, Gustafson, Green, Magnafici, Michalski, O'Connor, Schmidt, Snyder and Swearingen; cosponsored by Senators Tomczyk, Ballweg, Cowles, Felzkowski, Quinn, Testin and Nass
Sponsors
- Jeffrey Mursau · Primary
- Calvin Callahan · Primary
- Edming · Primary
- Nate Gustafson · Primary
- Chanz Green · Primary
- Magnafici · Primary
- Michalski · Primary
- Jerry O'Connor · Primary
- Schmidt · Primary
- Patrick Snyder · Primary
- Rob Swearingen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →11 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (11)
- Mursau, Jeffrey Republican
- Callahan, Calvin Republican
- Edming
- Gustafson, Nate Republican
- Green, Chanz Republican
- Magnafici
- Michalski
- O'Connor, Jerry Republican
- Schmidt
- Snyder, Patrick Republican
- Swearingen, Rob Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 511?
- AB 511 is sponsored by Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican), Callahan, Calvin (Republican), Edming, Gustafson, Nate (Republican), Green, Chanz (Republican), Magnafici, Michalski, O'Connor, Jerry (Republican), Schmidt, Snyder, Patrick (Republican), and Swearingen, Rob (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 511?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 511?
- Track AB 511 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 511
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 511
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →