Strengthening parent-child visitation during child welfare proceedings.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1194 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1194.
You're tracking HB 1194
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1194 — Strengthening parent-child visitation during child welfare proceedings.
Last action — Effective date 7/25/2021.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
500 added · 506 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes made to House Bill 1194 emphasize the protection of children's visitations with siblings. The new version clarifies that the department must provide clear evidence during a case conference if they want to remove supervision of visits, which is meant to better safeguard the child's safety. Additionally, it is now explicitly stated that visitations cannot be restricted as punishment or as a reward for behavior, ensuring that sibling relationships remain protected and prioritized. These adjustments matter because they aim to enhance the well-being of children in foster care by emphasizing family connections.
H-0545.1H-0284.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1194 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2021 Regular Session By House Children, Youth & Families (originally sponsored by Representatives Ortiz-Self, Senn, Young, Santos, Callan, Morgan, Davis, and Harris-Talley)Harris-Talley ANRead ACTfirst Relatingtime to01/14/21. strengthening parent-child visitation during child welfare proceedings;
Referred to Committee on Children, Youth & Families.
AN ACT Relating to strengthening parent-child visitation during child welfare proceedings;
1 SHBHB 1194 (4) The first visit under this section must take place within 72 hours of removal, unless the court finds that extraordinary circumstances require delay.
2 SHBHB 1194 following a case conference under this section.
To overcome this presumption, the department must establishprovide evidence during the case conference establishing that removing visit supervision or monitoring would create a risk to the child's safety.
3 SHBHB 1194 older.
4 SHBHB 1194 (ii)(A) Visitation is the right of the family, including the child and the parent, in cases in which visitation is in the best interest of the child.
5 SHBHB 1194 extent that such resources are available, and appropriate, and the child's safety would not be compromised.
(E) If the court previously ordered that visitation between a parent and child be supervised or monitored, there shall be a presumption that such supervision or monitoring will no longer be necessary when the permanency plan is entered.
To overcome this presumption, the department must provide a report to the court including sufficient evidence establishing that removing visit supervision or monitoring would create a risk to the child's safety,safety. and the court shall make a determination as to whether visit supervision or monitoring must continue.
and (c) If the court has ordered, pursuant to RCW 13.34.130(9), that a termination petition be filed, a specific plan as to where the child will be placed, what steps will be taken to achieve permanency for the child, services to be offered or provided to the child, and, if visitation would be in the best interests of the child, a recommendation to the court regarding visitation between parent and p.
6 SHBHB 1194 if visitation would be in the best interests of the child, a recommendation to the court regarding visitation between parent and child pending a fact-finding hearing on the termination petition.
If the child adoptee or his or her siblings are represented by an attorney or guardian ad litem in a proceeding under this chapter or in any other child custody proceeding, the court shall inquire of each p.
7 SHBHB 1194 or guardian ad litem in a proceeding under this chapter or in any other child custody proceeding, the court shall inquire of each attorney and guardian ad litem regarding the potential benefits of continuing contact between the siblings and the potential detriments of severing contact.
(b) Prior to the child returning home, the department must complete the following:
8 SHBHB 1194 (b)(i) PriorIdentify toall theadults childresiding returningin home, the departmenthome mustand completeconduct thebackground following:checks on those persons;
(i) Identify all adults residing in the home and conduct background checks on those persons;
If additional services, including housing assistance, are needed to facilitate the return of the child to the child's p.parents, the court shall order that reasonable services be offered specifying such services;
9p. SHB 1194 parents, the court shall order that reasonable services be offered specifying such services;
9 HB 1194 (ii) Whether there has been compliance with the case plan by the child, the child's parents, and the agency supervising the placement;
(xi) Whether the parents have visited the child and any reasons why visitation has not occurred or has been infrequent;
10 SHBHB 1194 (xi)(xii) Whether theterms parentsof have visited the child and any reasons why visitation hasneed notto occurredbe ormodified. has been infrequent;
(xii)If Whetherthe termscourt ofpreviously ordered that visitation needbetween toa parent and child must be modified.supervised, there shall be a presumption that such supervision will no longer be necessary after the review hearing.
IfTo theovercome courtthis previouslypresumption, orderedthe thatdepartment visitation between a parent and child must besubmit supervised,to therethe shallcourt besufficient aevidence presumptionestablishing that suchremoving visit supervision orwould monitoringcreate willa norisk longerto be necessary after the reviewchild's hearing.safety;
To overcome this presumption, the department must provide a report to the court including evidence establishing that removing visit supervision or monitoring would create a risk to the child's safety, and the court shall make a determination as to whether visit supervision or monitoring must continue;
or (iii) The failure of the parents to successfully and substantially complete available services or treatment for themselves p.or the child, including substance abuse treatment if a parent's substance abuse was a contributing factor to the abuse or neglect.
11(c) SHBIn 1194a orpending thedependency child,case includingin substancewhich abusethe treatmentcourt iforders that a parent'sdependent substancechild abusemay wasbe areturned contributinghome factorand tothat child is later removed from the abusehome, orthe neglect.court shall hold a review hearing within thirty p.
(c)11 InHB a1194 pending dependency case in which the court orders that a dependent child may be returned home and that child is later removed from the home, the court shall hold a review hearing within thirty days from the date of removal to determine whether the permanency plan should be changed, a termination petition should be filed, or other action is warranted.
p.(2)(a) If it is likely that the child will remain in shelter care longer than ((seventy-two)) 72 hours, the department shall submit a recommendation to the court as to the further need for shelter care in all cases in which the child will remain in shelter care longer than the ((seventy-two)) 72 hour period.
12In SHB 1194 (2)(a) If it is likely that the child will remain in shelter care longer than ((seventy-two)) 72 hours, the department shall submit a recommendation to the court as to the further need for shelter care in all casesother incases, which the childp. will remain in shelter care longer than the ((seventy-two)) 72 hour period.
In12 allHB other1194 cases, the recommendation shall be submitted by the juvenile court probation counselor.
The court shall make an express finding as to whether the notice required p.under RCW 13.34.062 was given to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian.
13If SHBactual 1194notice underwas RCWnot 13.34.062given wasto giventhe parent, guardian, or legal custodian and the whereabouts of such person is known or can be ascertained, the court shall order the department to make reasonable efforts to advise the parent, guardian, or legal custodian.custodian of the p.
If13 actualHB notice1194 was not given to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian and the whereabouts of such person is known or can be ascertained, the court shall order the department to make reasonable efforts to advise the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the status of the case, including the date and time of any subsequent hearings, and their rights under RCW 13.34.090;
(i) Whether, as provided in RCW 26.44.063, restraining orders, or orders expelling an allegedly abusive household member from the home p.of a nonabusive parent, guardian, or legal custodian, will allow the child to safely remain in the home;
14 SHB 1194 of a nonabusive parent, guardian, or legal custodian, will allow the child to safely remain in the home;
The court may not order a parent to undergo examinations, evaluation, or services at the shelter care hearingp. unless the parent agrees to the examination, evaluation, or service;
14 HB 1194 hearing unless the parent agrees to the examination, evaluation, or service;
p.(ii) Facilitate the child's visitation with siblings, if such visitation is part of the department's plan or is ordered by the court;
Show all 52 changed lines (12 more)
15 SHB 1194 (ii) Facilitate the child's visitation with siblings, if such visitation is part of the department's plan or is ordered by the court;
(c)p. If the child was not initially placed with a relative or other suitable person, and the court does not release the child to his or her parent, guardian, or legal custodian, the department shall make reasonable efforts to locate a relative or other suitable person pursuant to RCW 13.34.060(1).
15 HB 1194 (c) If the child was not initially placed with a relative or other suitable person, and the court does not release the child to his or her parent, guardian, or legal custodian, the department shall make reasonable efforts to locate a relative or other suitable person pursuant to RCW 13.34.060(1).
(g) Uncertainty by a parent, guardian, legal custodian, relative, or other suitable person that the alleged abuser has in fact abused the child shall not, alone, be the basis upon which a child is removed from the care of a parent, guardian, or legal custodian under (a) of this subsection, nor shall it be a basis, alone, to preclude p.
16 SHBHB 1194 (g) Uncertainty by a parent, guardian, legal custodian, relative, or other suitable person that the alleged abuser has in fact abused the child shall not, alone, be the basis upon which a child is removed from the care of a parent, guardian, or legal custodian under (a) of this subsection, nor shall it be a basis, alone, to preclude placement with a relative or other suitable person under (b) of this subsection.
(ii) If the court previously ordered that visitation between a parent and child be supervised or monitored, there shall be a presumption that such supervision or monitoring will no longer be necessary following a continued shelter care order under (a)(i) of this subsection.
To overcome this presumption, the department must providesubmit aevidence report to the court including evidence establishing that removing visit supervision or monitoring would create a risk to the child's safety,safety. and the court shall make a determination as to whether visit supervision or monitoring must continue.
(b)(i) An order releasing the child on any conditions specified in this section may at any time be amended, with notice and hearing p.thereon, so as to return the child to shelter care for failure of the parties to conform to the conditions originally imposed.
17 SHB 1194 thereon, so as to return the child to shelter care for failure of the parties to conform to the conditions originally imposed.
(8)(a)p. If a child is returned home from shelter care a second time in the case, or if the supervisor of the caseworker deems it necessary, the multidisciplinary team may be reconvened.
17 HB 1194 (8)(a) If a child is returned home from shelter care a second time in the case, or if the supervisor of the caseworker deems it necessary, the multidisciplinary team may be reconvened.
18 SHBHB 1194
Show all 52 changed rows (12 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Engrossed Second Substitute Bill pdf
- Substitute Second Substitute Bill pdf
Action History
-
Effective date 7/25/2021.
-
Chapter 208, 2021 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
President signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
Passed final passage; yeas, 96; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 2.
-
House concurred in Senate amendments.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 49; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Committee amendment(s) adopted with no other amendments.
-
Placed on second reading consent calendar.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 09:00 AM
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
WM - Majority; do pass with amendment(s) by Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation.
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 9:00 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 01:30 PM
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 1:30 PM.
-
Referred to Ways & Means.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 10:30 AM
-
And refer to Ways & Means.
-
HSRR - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).
-
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 10:30 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 10:30 AM
-
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 10:30 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 98; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
2nd substitute bill substituted (APP 21).
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 01:30 PM
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Appropriations at 1:30 PM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 03:30 PM
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 3:30 PM.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Children, Youth & Families at 08:00 AM
-
CYF - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Children, Youth & Families at 8:00 AM.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Children, Youth & Families at 08:00 AM
-
Public hearing in the House Committee on Children, Youth & Families at 8:00 AM.
-
First reading, referred to Children, Youth & Families.
Sponsors
- Harris-Talley · Cosponsor
- Lauren Davis · Cosponsor
- Melanie Morgan · Cosponsor
- Lisa Callan · Cosponsor
- Sharon Tomiko Santos · Cosponsor
- Young · Cosponsor
- Lillian Ortiz-Self · Primary
- Tana Senn · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat
Co-sponsors (7)
- Harris-Talley
- Lauren Davis Democrat
- Melanie Morgan Democrat
- Lisa Callan Democrat
- Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat
- Young
- Tana Senn Democrat
Not signed on (143)
143 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 143 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 46 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 96 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chambers | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Yea |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Gilday | — | Yea |
| Harris-Talley | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Yea |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Yea |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| McCaslin | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Robertson | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Yea |
| Wicks | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Johnson, J. | — | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Yea |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Joel McEntire | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| T'wina Nobles | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim McCune | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Perry Dozier | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 98 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chambers | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Yea |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Gilday | — | Yea |
| Harris-Talley | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Yea |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Yea |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| McCaslin | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Robertson | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Yea |
| Wicks | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Johnson, J. | — | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Alicia Rule | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| April Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dan Bronoske | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| David Hackney | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessica Bateman | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Berry | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Tarra Simmons | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Yea |
| Cyndy Jacobsen | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Joel McEntire | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Klicker | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Peter Abbarno | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1194?
- HB 1194 is sponsored by Harris-Talley, Lauren Davis (Democrat), Melanie Morgan (Democrat), Lisa Callan (Democrat), Sharon Tomiko Santos (Democrat), Young, Lillian Ortiz-Self (Democrat), and Tana Senn (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1194?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1194?
- Track HB 1194 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1194
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1194
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →