Washington 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted 6 D cosponsors

HB 1194 — Strengthening parent-child visitation during child welfare proceedings.

Last action — Effective date 7/25/2021.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2021. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 8 sponsors

    1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

500 added · 506 removed

Plain-language change summary

The changes made to House Bill 1194 emphasize the protection of children's visitations with siblings. The new version clarifies that the department must provide clear evidence during a case conference if they want to remove supervision of visits, which is meant to better safeguard the child's safety. Additionally, it is now explicitly stated that visitations cannot be restricted as punishment or as a reward for behavior, ensuring that sibling relationships remain protected and prioritized. These adjustments matter because they aim to enhance the well-being of children in foster care by emphasizing family connections.

→
Previous
Latest
H-0545.1 SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1194 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2021 Regular Session By House Children, Youth & Families (originally sponsored by Representatives Ortiz-Self, Senn, Young, Santos, Callan, Morgan, Davis, and Harris-Talley) AN ACT Relating to strengthening parent-child visitation during child welfare proceedings;
H-0284.1 HOUSE BILL 1194 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2021 Regular Session By Representatives Ortiz-Self, Senn, Young, Santos, Callan, Morgan, Davis, and Harris-Talley Read first time 01/14/21.
Referred to Committee on Children, Youth & Families.
AN ACT Relating to strengthening parent-child visitation during child welfare proceedings;
1 SHB 1194 (4) The first visit under this section must take place within 72 hours of removal, unless the court finds that extraordinary circumstances require delay.
1 HB 1194 (4) The first visit under this section must take place within 72 hours of removal, unless the court finds that extraordinary circumstances require delay.
2 SHB 1194 following a case conference under this section.
2 HB 1194 following a case conference under this section.
To overcome this presumption, the department must establish during the case conference that removing visit supervision or monitoring would create a risk to the child's safety.
To overcome this presumption, the department must provide evidence during the case conference establishing that removing visit supervision or monitoring would create a risk to the child's safety.
3 SHB 1194 older.
3 HB 1194 older.
4 SHB 1194 (ii)(A) Visitation is the right of the family, including the child and the parent, in cases in which visitation is in the best interest of the child.
4 HB 1194 (ii)(A) Visitation is the right of the family, including the child and the parent, in cases in which visitation is in the best interest of the child.
5 SHB 1194 extent that such resources are available, and appropriate, and the child's safety would not be compromised.
5 HB 1194 extent that such resources are available, and appropriate, and the child's safety would not be compromised.
(E) If the court previously ordered that visitation between a parent and child be supervised or monitored, there shall be a presumption that such supervision or monitoring will no longer be necessary when the permanency plan is entered.
(E) If the court previously ordered that visitation between a parent and child be supervised or monitored, there shall be a presumption that such supervision will no longer be necessary when the permanency plan is entered.
To overcome this presumption, the department must provide a report to the court including evidence establishing that removing visit supervision or monitoring would create a risk to the child's safety, and the court shall make a determination as to whether visit supervision or monitoring must continue.
To overcome this presumption, the department must provide a report to the court including sufficient evidence establishing that removing visit supervision or monitoring would create a risk to the child's safety.
and (c) If the court has ordered, pursuant to RCW 13.34.130(9), that a termination petition be filed, a specific plan as to where the child will be placed, what steps will be taken to achieve permanency for the child, services to be offered or provided to the child, and, p.
and (c) If the court has ordered, pursuant to RCW 13.34.130(9), that a termination petition be filed, a specific plan as to where the child will be placed, what steps will be taken to achieve permanency for the child, services to be offered or provided to the child, and, if visitation would be in the best interests of the child, a recommendation to the court regarding visitation between parent and p.
6 SHB 1194 if visitation would be in the best interests of the child, a recommendation to the court regarding visitation between parent and child pending a fact-finding hearing on the termination petition.
6 HB 1194 child pending a fact-finding hearing on the termination petition.
If the child adoptee or his or her siblings are represented by an attorney p.
If the child adoptee or his or her siblings are represented by an attorney or guardian ad litem in a proceeding under this chapter or in any other child custody proceeding, the court shall inquire of each p.
7 SHB 1194 or guardian ad litem in a proceeding under this chapter or in any other child custody proceeding, the court shall inquire of each attorney and guardian ad litem regarding the potential benefits of continuing contact between the siblings and the potential detriments of severing contact.
7 HB 1194 attorney and guardian ad litem regarding the potential benefits of continuing contact between the siblings and the potential detriments of severing contact.
(b) Prior to the child returning home, the department must complete the following:
8 SHB 1194 (b) Prior to the child returning home, the department must complete the following:
8 HB 1194 (i) Identify all adults residing in the home and conduct background checks on those persons;
(i) Identify all adults residing in the home and conduct background checks on those persons;
If additional services, including housing assistance, are needed to facilitate the return of the child to the child's p.
If additional services, including housing assistance, are needed to facilitate the return of the child to the child's parents, the court shall order that reasonable services be offered specifying such services;
9 SHB 1194 parents, the court shall order that reasonable services be offered specifying such services;
p.
(ii) Whether there has been compliance with the case plan by the child, the child's parents, and the agency supervising the placement;
9 HB 1194 (ii) Whether there has been compliance with the case plan by the child, the child's parents, and the agency supervising the placement;
(xi) Whether the parents have visited the child and any reasons why visitation has not occurred or has been infrequent;
10 SHB 1194 (xi) Whether the parents have visited the child and any reasons why visitation has not occurred or has been infrequent;
10 HB 1194 (xii) Whether terms of visitation need to be modified.
(xii) Whether terms of visitation need to be modified.
If the court previously ordered that visitation between a parent and child must be supervised, there shall be a presumption that such supervision will no longer be necessary after the review hearing.
If the court previously ordered that visitation between a parent and child must be supervised, there shall be a presumption that such supervision or monitoring will no longer be necessary after the review hearing.
To overcome this presumption, the department must submit to the court sufficient evidence establishing that removing visit supervision would create a risk to the child's safety;
To overcome this presumption, the department must provide a report to the court including evidence establishing that removing visit supervision or monitoring would create a risk to the child's safety, and the court shall make a determination as to whether visit supervision or monitoring must continue;
or (iii) The failure of the parents to successfully and substantially complete available services or treatment for themselves p.
or (iii) The failure of the parents to successfully and substantially complete available services or treatment for themselves or the child, including substance abuse treatment if a parent's substance abuse was a contributing factor to the abuse or neglect.
11 SHB 1194 or the child, including substance abuse treatment if a parent's substance abuse was a contributing factor to the abuse or neglect.
(c) In a pending dependency case in which the court orders that a dependent child may be returned home and that child is later removed from the home, the court shall hold a review hearing within thirty p.
(c) In a pending dependency case in which the court orders that a dependent child may be returned home and that child is later removed from the home, the court shall hold a review hearing within thirty days from the date of removal to determine whether the permanency plan should be changed, a termination petition should be filed, or other action is warranted.
11 HB 1194 days from the date of removal to determine whether the permanency plan should be changed, a termination petition should be filed, or other action is warranted.
p.
(2)(a) If it is likely that the child will remain in shelter care longer than ((seventy-two)) 72 hours, the department shall submit a recommendation to the court as to the further need for shelter care in all cases in which the child will remain in shelter care longer than the ((seventy-two)) 72 hour period.
12 SHB 1194 (2)(a) If it is likely that the child will remain in shelter care longer than ((seventy-two)) 72 hours, the department shall submit a recommendation to the court as to the further need for shelter care in all cases in which the child will remain in shelter care longer than the ((seventy-two)) 72 hour period.
In all other cases, the p.
In all other cases, the recommendation shall be submitted by the juvenile court probation counselor.
12 HB 1194 recommendation shall be submitted by the juvenile court probation counselor.
The court shall make an express finding as to whether the notice required p.
The court shall make an express finding as to whether the notice required under RCW 13.34.062 was given to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian.
13 SHB 1194 under RCW 13.34.062 was given to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian.
If actual notice was not given to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian and the whereabouts of such person is known or can be ascertained, the court shall order the department to make reasonable efforts to advise the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the p.
If actual notice was not given to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian and the whereabouts of such person is known or can be ascertained, the court shall order the department to make reasonable efforts to advise the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the status of the case, including the date and time of any subsequent hearings, and their rights under RCW 13.34.090;
13 HB 1194 status of the case, including the date and time of any subsequent hearings, and their rights under RCW 13.34.090;
(i) Whether, as provided in RCW 26.44.063, restraining orders, or orders expelling an allegedly abusive household member from the home p.
(i) Whether, as provided in RCW 26.44.063, restraining orders, or orders expelling an allegedly abusive household member from the home of a nonabusive parent, guardian, or legal custodian, will allow the child to safely remain in the home;
14 SHB 1194 of a nonabusive parent, guardian, or legal custodian, will allow the child to safely remain in the home;
The court may not order a parent to undergo examinations, evaluation, or services at the shelter care hearing unless the parent agrees to the examination, evaluation, or service;
The court may not order a parent to undergo examinations, evaluation, or services at the shelter care p.
14 HB 1194 hearing unless the parent agrees to the examination, evaluation, or service;
p.
(ii) Facilitate the child's visitation with siblings, if such visitation is part of the department's plan or is ordered by the court;
Show all 52 changed rows (12 more)
Previous
Latest
15 SHB 1194 (ii) Facilitate the child's visitation with siblings, if such visitation is part of the department's plan or is ordered by the court;
(c) If the child was not initially placed with a relative or other suitable person, and the court does not release the child to his or her parent, guardian, or legal custodian, the department shall make reasonable efforts to locate a relative or other suitable person pursuant to RCW 13.34.060(1).
p.
15 HB 1194 (c) If the child was not initially placed with a relative or other suitable person, and the court does not release the child to his or her parent, guardian, or legal custodian, the department shall make reasonable efforts to locate a relative or other suitable person pursuant to RCW 13.34.060(1).
p.
(g) Uncertainty by a parent, guardian, legal custodian, relative, or other suitable person that the alleged abuser has in fact abused the child shall not, alone, be the basis upon which a child is removed from the care of a parent, guardian, or legal custodian under (a) of this subsection, nor shall it be a basis, alone, to preclude p.
16 SHB 1194 (g) Uncertainty by a parent, guardian, legal custodian, relative, or other suitable person that the alleged abuser has in fact abused the child shall not, alone, be the basis upon which a child is removed from the care of a parent, guardian, or legal custodian under (a) of this subsection, nor shall it be a basis, alone, to preclude placement with a relative or other suitable person under (b) of this subsection.
16 HB 1194 placement with a relative or other suitable person under (b) of this subsection.
(ii) If the court previously ordered that visitation between a parent and child be supervised or monitored, there shall be a presumption that such supervision or monitoring will no longer be necessary following a continued shelter care order under (a)(i) of this subsection.
(ii) If the court previously ordered that visitation between a parent and child be supervised or monitored, there shall be a presumption that such supervision will no longer be necessary following a continued shelter care order under (a)(i) of this subsection.
To overcome this presumption, the department must provide a report to the court including evidence establishing that removing visit supervision or monitoring would create a risk to the child's safety, and the court shall make a determination as to whether visit supervision or monitoring must continue.
To overcome this presumption, the department must submit evidence to the court establishing that removing visit supervision or monitoring would create a risk to the child's safety.
(b)(i) An order releasing the child on any conditions specified in this section may at any time be amended, with notice and hearing p.
(b)(i) An order releasing the child on any conditions specified in this section may at any time be amended, with notice and hearing thereon, so as to return the child to shelter care for failure of the parties to conform to the conditions originally imposed.
17 SHB 1194 thereon, so as to return the child to shelter care for failure of the parties to conform to the conditions originally imposed.
(8)(a) If a child is returned home from shelter care a second time in the case, or if the supervisor of the caseworker deems it necessary, the multidisciplinary team may be reconvened.
p.
17 HB 1194 (8)(a) If a child is returned home from shelter care a second time in the case, or if the supervisor of the caseworker deems it necessary, the multidisciplinary team may be reconvened.
18 SHB 1194
18 HB 1194
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. Effective date 7/25/2021.

  2. Chapter 208, 2021 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. President signed.

  6. Speaker signed.

  7. Passed final passage; yeas, 96; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  8. House concurred in Senate amendments.

  9. Third reading, passed; yeas, 49; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  10. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  11. Committee amendment(s) adopted with no other amendments.

  12. Placed on second reading consent calendar.

  13. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 09:00 AM

  14. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  15. WM - Majority; do pass with amendment(s) by Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation.

  16. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 9:00 AM.

  17. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 01:30 PM

  18. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 1:30 PM.

  19. Referred to Ways & Means.

  20. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 10:30 AM

  21. And refer to Ways & Means.

  22. HSRR - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  23. Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 10:30 AM.

  24. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 10:30 AM

  25. Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 10:30 AM.

  26. First reading, referred to Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation.

  27. Third reading, passed; yeas, 98; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  28. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  29. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  30. 2nd substitute bill substituted (APP 21).

  31. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  32. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  33. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 01:30 PM

  34. Minority; without recommendation.

  35. Minority; do not pass.

  36. APP - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  37. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Appropriations at 1:30 PM.

  38. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 03:30 PM

  39. Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 3:30 PM.

  40. Referred to Appropriations.

  41. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Children, Youth & Families at 08:00 AM

  42. CYF - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  43. Executive action taken in the House Committee on Children, Youth & Families at 8:00 AM.

  44. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Children, Youth & Families at 08:00 AM

  45. Public hearing in the House Committee on Children, Youth & Families at 8:00 AM.

  46. First reading, referred to Children, Youth & Families.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (7)

Not signed on (143)

143 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 143 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 96 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 26000
Democrat 46002
Unaffiliated 24000
Total 96002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Chambers — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Gilday — Yea
Harris-Talley — Yea
Hoff — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Yea
Kretz — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Robertson — Yea
Sells — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Sutherland — Yea
Vick — Yea
Wicks — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Johnson, J. — Yea
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Alicia Rule Democrat Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
April Berg Democrat Yea
Bill Ramos Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Dan Bronoske Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
David Hackney Democrat Yea
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Not Voting
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Liz Berry Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Not Voting
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Tarra Simmons Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Chris Corry Republican Yea
Cyndy Jacobsen Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Joel McEntire Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Mark Klicker Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Peter Abbarno Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 49 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20000
Republican 13000
Democrat 16000
Total 49000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Billig — Yea
Brown — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Das — Yea
Ericksen — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Padden — Yea
Randall — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Wilson, L. — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
T'wina Nobles Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Chris Gildon Republican Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jeff Wilson Republican Yea
Jim McCune Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Perry Dozier Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Ron Muzzall Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 98 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 26000
Democrat 48000
Unaffiliated 24000
Total 98000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Chambers — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Gilday — Yea
Harris-Talley — Yea
Hoff — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Yea
Kretz — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Robertson — Yea
Sells — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Sutherland — Yea
Vick — Yea
Wicks — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Johnson, J. — Yea
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Alicia Rule Democrat Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
April Berg Democrat Yea
Bill Ramos Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Dan Bronoske Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Yea
David Hackney Democrat Yea
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Jessica Bateman Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Liz Berry Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Yea
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Tarra Simmons Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Chris Corry Republican Yea
Cyndy Jacobsen Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Joel McEntire Republican Yea
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Mark Klicker Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Peter Abbarno Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 1194?
HB 1194 is sponsored by Harris-Talley, Lauren Davis (Democrat), Melanie Morgan (Democrat), Lisa Callan (Democrat), Sharon Tomiko Santos (Democrat), Young, Lillian Ortiz-Self (Democrat), and Tana Senn (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 1194?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 1194?
Track HB 1194 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1194

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1194

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →