Immunity of persons; statements regarding matters of public concern or made at a public hearing.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 375 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 375.
You're tracking SB 375
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 375 — Immunity of persons; statements regarding matters of public concern or made at a public hearing.
Last action — Failed to pass in Senate
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Immunity of persons; statements regarding matters of public concern or made at a public hearing; special plea to dismiss; stay of discovery. Provides that a person claiming immunity from certain claims for making statements at a public hearing or regarding matters of public concern may file a special plea to dismiss the underlying claim. The bill further provides that, upon the filing of such a plea, discovery related to such underlying claim shall be stayed pending the entry of an order adjudicating the plea.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
86 added · 48 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated bill SB 375 adds a new section to clarify protections for individuals who speak on matters of public interest, such as issues relating to health, safety, or civil rights. It replaces the old section, streamlining the language and broadening the definition of what constitutes a "matter of public concern." This change matters because it enhances legal protections for citizens who engage in public discourse, encouraging open dialogue on important issues without the fear of legal repercussions.
Code of Virginia Administrative Code Bills & Resolutions Summaries OTHER SESSIONS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Special Session II Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Special Session II Session Session Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Session Session Special Session I Session Special Session I Special Session II Session Session Special Session I Session Session Special Session I Special Session II Session Session Session Special Session I Session Session Session Special Session I Session Session Session Session Special Session I Special Session II VIRGINIA LAW PORTALCode of VirginiaVirginia Administrative Code Constitution of VirginiaChartersAuthoritiesCompacts Uncodified ActsRIS Users (account required) SEARCHABLE DATABASESBills & Resolutionssession legislationBill Summariessession summaries Reports to the General AssemblyHouse and Senate documents Legislative LiaisonsState agency contactsACROSS SESSIONS Subject Index:
SESSION history | hilite | pdf | print version 20107641D20108556D SENATE BILL NO.
375 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the SenateHouse Committee onfor theCourts Judiciaryof Justice on February 10,28, 2020) (Patron Prior to Substitute--Senator Edwards) A BILL to amend the Code of Virginia by adding a section numbered 8.01-223.3 and reenactto repeal § 8.01-223.2 of the Code of Virginia, relating to immunitystrategic oflawsuits persons;against public participation;
statementsspecial regardingmotion mattersto ofdismiss; public concern or made at a public hearing;
specialstay pleaof todiscovery; dismiss;
stayfees ofand discovery.costs.
That § 8.01-223.2 of the Code of Virginia is amended andby reenactedadding a section numbered 8.01-223.3 as follows:
§ 8.01-223.2.8.01-223.3.
ImmunityStrategic oflawsuits personsagainst for statements made at public hearingparticipation; or communicated to third party.
procedures.
AFor person shall be immune from civil liability for a violation of § 18.2-499, a claim of tortious interference with an existing contract or a business or contractual expectancy, or a claim of defamation based solely on statements (i) regarding matters of public concern that would be protected under the Firstpurposes Amendment to the United States Constitution or Article I, Section 12 of thethis Constitutionsection: of Virginia made by that person that are communicated to a third party or (ii) made at a public hearing before the governing body of any locality or other political subdivision, or the boards, commissions, agencies and authorities thereof, and other governing bodies of any local governmental entity concerning matters properly before such body.
The"Matter immunityof providedpublic byconcern" thismeans section shall not apply to any statementsoral madestatement withmade, actual or constructivewritten knowledgestatement that they are false or withother recklessdocument disregardsubmitted, for(i) whetherin a highlegislative, degreeexecutive, ofor awarenessjudicial thatproceeding theyor areother probablyproceeding false.authorized by law;
(ii) in connection with an issue or other proceeding authorized by law under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body;
(iii) in connection with a public official, public figure, or other person who has drawn public attention due to the person's official acts, fame, notoriety, or celebrity;
(iv) in connection with an issue of political, social, or other significance to a local community or neighborhood;
or (v) in connection with an issue related to public health, public safety, protection of survivors of violence, abuse, or exploitation, environmental protection, civil rights, civil liberties, or a government entity or election.
"Matter of public concern" shall not be construed to include private interests, such as statements directed primarily toward protecting the defendant's commercial interests, rather than commenting on or sharing information about a matter of public concern.
"Strategic lawsuit against public participation" or "SLAPP" means a civil claim against a defendant based on, or in response to, the defendant's lawful exercise of the constitutional right to petition or free speech on a matter of public concern.
A personparty claimingalleging immunitythat pursuanta toclaim thisfiled sectionagainst him is a SLAPP may file a special pleamotion to dismissdismiss. the underlying claim.
UponSuch thespecial filingmotion of such a plea, discovery proceedings related to suchdismiss underlying claim shall be stayed,treated except as expresslya provideddemurrer herein,pursuant pendingto the§ entry8.01-273. of an order adjudicating such a plea.
AfterUpon consideration of the pleadingsfiling andof anysuch othera evidence,special whichmotion, may be developed by discovery limitedproceedings related to the issuesclaim raisedalleged byto thebe plea,a theSLAPP court shall eitherbe denystayed thepending plea or, if the courtentry determinesof thatan (i)order theadjudicating defendantsuch meetsa thespecial standardmotion in subsection A and (ii) the plaintiff has not alleged sufficient facts or failed to providedismiss. sufficient evidence to overrule the plea, shall sustain the plea and dismiss the claim with prejudice.
InThe anycourt hearingshall addressinghold thean specialexpedited plea,hearing theon courtsuch shallspecial reviewmotion anyto allegationsdismiss and evidenceissue underan theorder standardas outlinedsoon foras motionspracticable forafter summarysuch judgment.hearing.
If such special motion to dismiss is granted, dismissal of the SLAPP shall be with prejudice.
AnyIf personthe whomoving hasparty aprevails, suitin againstwhole himor dismissedin pursuantpart, on a special motion to dismiss, the immunitycourt providedshall byaward thissuch sectionmoving mayparty bereasonable awardedexpenses reasonablerelated to such motion, including attorney fees and costs.
If the responding party to such special motion to dismiss prevails, and the court finds that such special motion to dismiss was filed in bad faith or solely with the intent to delay the proceedings on the underlying claim, the court may award such responding party reasonable expenses related to such motion, including attorney fees and costs.
D.
The provisions of this section shall not apply to:
1.
Any claim that arises out of the sale or lease of goods or services, including insurance products, between a seller and an actual or potential buyer or customer.
This subdivision does not apply to:
a.
Any publisher, editor, reporter, or other person connected with or employed by a newspaper, magazine, or other periodical publication, or by a press association or wire service, or any person who has been so connected or employed;
b.
A radio or television news reporter or other person connected with or employed by a radio or television station, or any person who has been so connected or employed;
c.
Any person engaged in the dissemination of ideas or expression in any book or academic journal while engaged in the gathering, receiving, or processing of information for communication to the public;
or d.
Any action against any person or entity based upon the creation, dissemination, exhibition, advertisement, or other similar promotion of any dramatic, literary, musical, political, or artistic work, including a motion picture or television program and an article published in a newspaper or magazine of general circulation.
2.
Any claim that is brought solely to enforce an important constitutional or statutory right held by the general public, or in an action seeking declaratory or injunctive relief against a governmental entity or agency.
Show all 54 changed lines (14 more)
3.
Any action filed under Title 20, or an application for a protective order under Title 16.1 or Title 19.2.
4.
Any claim that alleges discrimination or assault under a state or federal civil rights statute.
5.
Any claim that seeks recovery for bodily injury, wrongful death, or survival.
6.
Any claim that is brought by a whistleblower under a state or federal whistleblower statute.
7.
An enforcement action initiated by the Attorney General or an attorney for the Commonwealth.
2.
That § 8.01-223.2 of the Code of Virginia is repealed.
3.
That the procedures established by the first enactment of this act shall only be available for claims filed on or after July 1, 2020.
Show all 54 changed rows (14 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Committee Substitute Engrossed by House - committee substitute SB375H1 Current html February 28, 2020
- Committee Substitute Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB375S1 html February 10, 2020
- Committee Substitute Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB375S1 html January 06, 2020
Action History
-
Failed to pass in Senate
-
No further action taken
-
Conferees appointed by House
-
Conferees appointed by Senate
-
Senate acceded to request (40-Y 0-N)
-
House requested conference committee
-
House insisted on substitute
-
House substitute rejected by Senate
-
VOTE: Passage (58-Y 38-N 1-A)
-
Passed House with substitute (58-Y 38-N 1-A)
-
Engrossed by House - committee substitute SB375H1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 20108556D-H1
-
Read third time
-
Read second time
-
Committee substitute printed 20108556D-H1
-
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (14-Y 7-N)
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB375S1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 20107641D-S1
-
Reading of substitute waived
-
Read second time
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
-
Reported from Judiciary with substitute (14-Y 0-N)
-
Committee substitute printed 20107641D-S1
-
Assigned Judiciary sub: Civil Law
-
Moved from Courts of Justice to Judiciary due to a change of the committee name
-
Referred to Committee on the Judiciary
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/20 20102358D
Sponsors
- John S. Edwards · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 72 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Edwards, John S. Voted No
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 57 | 38 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 57 | 38 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 38% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (99)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 14 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 32% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lindsey, Joseph C. | — | Not Voting |
| Collins, Christopher E. | — | Yea |
| Adams, Les R. | — | Nay |
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Nay |
| Bourne, Jeffrey M. | — | Yea |
| Campbell, Jeffrey L. | — | Nay |
| Campbell, Ronnie R. | — | Nay |
| Carroll Foy, Jennifer D. | — | Yea |
| Charniele L. Herring | — | Yea |
| Don Scott | — | Yea |
| Heretick, Steve E. | — | Yea |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Nay |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Levine, Mark H. | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Miyares, Jason S. | — | Nay |
| Mullin, Michael P. | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Ransone, Margaret B. | — | Nay |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McClellan, Jennifer L. | — | Yea |
| Chafin, A. Benton "Ben" | — | Yea |
| Morrissey, Joseph D. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 375 do?
- Immunity of persons; statements regarding matters of public concern or made at a public hearing; special plea to dismiss; stay of discovery. Provides that a person claiming immunity from certain claims for making statements at a public hearing or regarding matters of public concern may file a special plea to dismiss the underlying claim. The bill further provides that, upon the filing of such a plea, discovery related to such underlying claim shall be stayed pending the entry of an order adjudicating the plea.
- Who sponsors SB 375?
- SB 375 is sponsored by Edwards, John S..
- What is the current status of SB 375?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 375?
- Track SB 375 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 375
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 375
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →