Texas 89th Legislature, 1st Called Session (2025) Status: Introduced

HB 219 — Relating to prohibiting certain criteria in a local governmental agency contractor selection process.

Last action — Filed

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 89th Legislature, 1st Called Session (2025). It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.

Read HB 219 on the official Texas source →

How this bill changes current law

1 change Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

This bill amends 1 section(s) of the Texas statutes: Section 271.909.

  • Section 271.909

    Sec. 271.909. CERTAIN CONTRACTING CRITERIA PROHIBITED. (a) In this section, "governmental agency" has the meaning assigned by Section 271.003. (b) Notwithstanding any other law, a governmental agency that procures a good or service through a competitive process may not: (1) consider any factor in the procurement process other than a factor that: (A) is required by law; or (B) is objective, measurable, and directly related to the cost, quality, reliability, or legal compliance of the good or service being procured; or (2) give a preference to a bid based on environmental, social, and governance criteria that do not directly relate to the cost, quality, reliability, or legal compliance of the good or service being procured. (c) For a competitive procurement process, a governmental agency shall: (1) provide written contract selection criteria in all publicly available bid specification requirements; and (2) include written contract selection criteria in the solicitation documents at the time of vendor solicitation. (d) A person may submit to the attorney general a suspected violation of this section. (e) If the attorney general determines that a governmental agency has violated this section: (1) if the procurement process is ongoing and a contract has not been awarded, the attorney general shall direct the governmental agency in writing to remove any contract selection criteria that the attorney general determines are prohibited under this section; or (2) if a contract has been awarded but has not been executed or performance of the contract has not been completed: (A) the attorney general shall direct the governmental agency in writing to terminate the contract not later than the 10th day after the date the governmental agency receives the notice; and (B) the governmental agency shall provide written proof of the termination of the contract to the attorney general within the period prescribed by Paragraph (A). (f) If a governmental agency fails to terminate a contract or provide written proof of the termination of a contract to the attorney general as required by and within the period prescribed by Subsection (e)(2), the contract is void. (g) The attorney general may bring an action for injunctive or declaratory relief to enforce this section if a governmental agency fails to comply with this section.

    added

Action History

  1. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 183 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (183)

183 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 183 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 219?
HB 219 is sponsored by Cecil Bell.
What is the current status of HB 219?
This bill died with 89th Legislature, 1st Called Session (2025). It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 219?
Track HB 219 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 219

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 219

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →