1 New Chapter;

Anti-Sanctuary Act.

Amend RSA by inserting after chapter 130 the following new chapter:

CHAPTER 130-A ANTI-SANCTUARY ACT 103-A:1 Definitions.

In this chapter:

“FederalA immigrationlaw agency”enforcement meansagency theshall, Unitedto States Department of Justice and the Unitedextent Statespossible Department of Homeland Security, a division within such an agency, including United States Immigration and Customstheir Enforcementability andto Unitedsafely Statesdo Customsso, andcomply Borderwith Protection,immigration anydetainers successordiscovered agency,during andthe anyinvestigation otherof federala agencyviolation charged with the enforcement of immigrationNew Hampshire law.

Unless otherwise authorized by law, no New Hampshire law enforcement agency shall investigate or take part in investigations related to a person’s citizenship status, unless it is subsequent to an alleged violation of New Hampshire law.

No agency shall have an explicit or implied blanket policy against honoring immigration detainers.

Any agency refusing to honor an immigration detainer shall report each such refusal to the attorney general in a time, form, and manner to be prescribed by the attorney general or the attorney general's designee.

“Immigration detainer” means a facially sufficient written or electronic request issued by a federal immigration agency using that agency's official form to request that another law enforcement agency detain a person based on probable cause to believe that the person to be detained is a removable alien under federal immigration law, including detainers issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C.

sections 1226 and 1357 along with a warrant described in subparagraph (c)For the purpose of this section, an immigration detainer shall be deemed facially sufficient if:

(a) The federal immigration agency's official form is complete and indicates on its face that the federal immigration official has probable cause to believe that the person to be detained is a removable alien under federal immigration law;

or (b) The federal immigration agency's official form is incomplete and fails to indicate on its face that the federal immigration official has probable cause to believe that the person to be detained is a removable alien under federal immigration law, but is supported by an affidavit, order, or other official documentation that indicates that the federal immigration agency has probable cause to believe that the person to be detained is a removable alien under federal immigration law;

and (c) The federal immigration agency supplies with its detention request a Form I-200 Warrant for Arrest of Alien or a Form I-205 Warrant of Removal/Deportation or a successor warrant or other warrant authorized by federal law.

III.

“Inmate” means a person in the custody of a law enforcement agency.

IV.

“Law enforcement agency” means an agency in this state charged with enforcement of state, county, municipal, or federal laws or with managing custody of detained persons in this state SB 563-FN - AS INTRODUCED - Page 2 - and includes municipal police departments, sheriff’s offices, state police departments, state university and college police departments, county correctional agencies, and the department of corrections.

V.

“Local governmental entity” means any county, municipality, or other political subdivision of this state.

VI.

“Sanctuary policy” means a law, policy, practice, procedure, or custom adopted or allowed by a state entity or local governmental entity which prohibits or impedes a law enforcement agency from complying with 8 U.S.C.

section 1373 or which prohibits or impedes a law enforcement agency from communicating or cooperating with a federal immigration agency so as to limit such law enforcement agency in, or prohibit the agency from:

(a) Complying with an immigration detainer;

(b) Complying with a request from a federal immigration agency to notify the agency before the release of an inmate or detainee in the custody of the law enforcement agency;

(c) Providing a federal immigration agency access to an inmate for interview;

(d) Participating in any program or agreement authorized under section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.

section 1357;

or (e) Providing a federal immigration agency with an inmate’s incarceration status or release date.

VII.

“State entity” means any county, city, municipality, town, village, village district, special district, or other political subdivision of this state, including law enforcement agencies.

The term shall include officials, officers, representatives, agents, and employees.

103-A:2 Prohibition of Sanctuary Policies.

No state government entity, local government entity, or law enforcement agency shall knowingly enact, issue, adopt, promulgate, enforce, permit, endorse, maintain, or have in effect any sanctuary policy.

103-A:3 Cooperation with Federal Immigration Authorities.

I.

A law enforcement agency shall use best efforts to support the enforcement of federal immigration law.

II.

(a) Sending the information to or requesting, receiving, or reviewing the information from a federal immigration agency for the purposes of this chapter.

SB 563-FN - AS INTRODUCED - Page 3 - (d) Using the information to comply with an immigration detainer.

This section does not requireapply ato stateany entity,alien localunlawfully governmentalpresent entity,in orthe lawUnited enforcementStates agencyif tohe provideor ashe federalis immigrationor agencyhas withbeen informationa relatednecessary towitness aor victim of or a witnesscrime toof adomestic criminalviolence, offenserape, ifsexual theexploitation, victimsexual assault, murder, manslaughter, assault, battery, human trafficking, kidnapping, false imprisonment, involuntary servitude, fraud in foreign labor contracting, blackmail, extortion, or witness timelytampering, unless an immigration detainer is on file for the person and the nature of the reason for the detainer is that the person is wanted for involvement in gooda faithsimilar respondscrime to thethose entity’slisted, or agency’sthe requestperson is wanted for informationreasons andrelated cooperationto interrorism, or the investigationperson is noted as being dangerous on the detainer, or prosecutionthe totality of the offense.circumstances would lead a reasonable officer to conclude that the person’s release would put the public in danger.

IV.In any such case, the agency shall Amendment to SB 563-FN - Page 2 - work with the federal immigration authorities to help ensure the availability of the person to participate in the prosecution of the state crime.

This section does not authorize a law enforcement agency to detain an alien unlawfully present in the United States pursuant to an immigration detainer solely because the alien witnessed or reported a crime or was a victim of a criminal offense.

V.

This section does not apply to any alien unlawfully present in the United States if he or she is or has been a necessary witness or victim of a crime of domestic violence, rape, sexual exploitation, sexual assault, murder, manslaughter, assault, battery, human trafficking, kidnapping, false imprisonment, involuntary servitude, fraud in foreign labor contracting, blackmail, extortion, or witness tampering.

103-A:4 Enforcement.

I.

Any executive or administrative state, county, or municipal officer who violates his or her duties under this chapter may be subject to action by the attorney general, who may file suit against a local governmental entity or local law enforcement agency in a court of competent jurisdiction for declaratory or injunctive relief for a violation of this chapter.

II.

If a local governmental entity or local law enforcement agency violates this chapter, the court shall enjoin the unlawful sanctuary policy.

The court has continuing jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter and may enforce its orders with the initiation of contempt proceedings as provided by law.

III.

An order approving a consent decree or granting an injunction shall include written findings of fact that describe with specificity the existence and nature of the sanctuary policy that violates this chapter.

2 Effective Date.

This act shall take effect January 1, 2025.

LBA 24-2873 Revised 12/20/23 SB 563-FN- FISCAL NOTE AS INTRODUCED AN ACT relative to federal immigration enforcement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

[ X ] State [ ] County [ ] Local [ ] None Estimated State Impact - Increase / (Decrease) FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 None Revenue Fund(s) Expenditures $0 Indeterminable Indeterminable Indeterminable Increase Increase Increase General Fund Funding Source(s) Appropriations $0 $0 $0 $0 None Funding Source(s) • Does this bill provide sufficient funding to cover estimated expenditu[X] No • Does this bill authorize new positions to implement this bill? [X] No METHODOLOGY:

This bill prohibits state and local government entities from adopting sanctuary policies to prohibit or impede the enforcement of federal immigration law.

The Department of Justice indicates this bill would authorize the Attorney General to bring enforcement actions for violations of the proposed chapter.

The Department states the fiscal impact would be proportional to the number of enforcement actions brought under the bill and the corresponding personnel and litigation costs associated with each action.

The number of enforcement actions that may result from the bill is unknown.

A small number of enforcement actions may be absorbed by the present staffing levels and litigation budget.

If this bill resulted in a significant number of enforcement actions, the Department would require an additional attorney in the Bureau of Civil Law and an increase in the litigation budget.

A larger number of enforcement actions would necessitate and increase in the litigation budget by up to $100,000, and Department of Justice would need an attorney to oversee those actions.

The estimated cost of an additional attorney, including benefits and associated costs, would be $127,000 in FY 2025, $125,000 in FY 2026 and $125,000 in FY 2027.

The Judicial Branch states it is not possible to estimate how this change in law would impact the number of filings in the courts.

Because the bill creates a new enforcement action, it is expected that litigation could increase.

AGENCIES CONTACTED:

Department of Justice and Judicial Branch