Amendment vs bill Amendment 376 vs Enrolled

Struck = removed from the bill · added = the amendment's new text.

Previous
Latest
Assembly Bill No.
Session (83rd) A AB444 376 Amendment No.
444–Assemblymember Hafen Joint Sponsor:
376 Assembly Amendment to Assembly Bill No.
Senator Neal CHAPTER..........
444 (BDR 18-772) Proposed by:
Assembly Committee on Government Affairs Amends:
Summary:
No Title:
Yes Preamble:
No Joint Sponsorship:
Yes Digest:
Yes ASSEMBLY ACTION Initial and Dat| SENATE ACTION Initial and Date Adopted Lost | Adopted Lost Concurred In Not | Concurred In Not Receded Not | Receded Not EXPLANATION:
Matter in (1) blue bold italics is new language in the original bill;
(2) variations of green bold underlining is language proposed to be added in this amendment;
(3) red strikethrough is deleted language in the original bill;
(4) purple double strikethrough is language proposed to be deleted in this amendment;
(5) orange double underlining is deleted language in the original bill proposed to be retained in this amendment.
TJO/EGO - Date:
4/17/2025 A.B.
No.
444—Revises provisions relating to governmental administration.
(BDR 18-772) Page 1 of 8 *A_AB444_376* Assembly Amendment No.
376 to Assembly Bill No.
444 Page 3 A SSEMBLY B ILLNO.
444–ASSEMBLYMEMBER HAFEN M ARCH 17,2025 _______________ JOINTS PONSOR :
ENATOR NEAL _______________ Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to governmental administration.
(BDR 18-772) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
May have Fiscal Impact.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
revising provisions relating to impact fees;
[authorizing certain legal actions to be taken for certain violations relating to the adoption of such ordinances or taking of such actions by a governing body of a local government;] revising provisions relating to impact fees;
employees are required to take certain actions to determine the impact of a proposed regulation on for-profit businesses that employ less than 150 employees before adopting a regulation that is likely to impose a direct and significant economic burden upon such a small business or that directly restricts the formation, operation or expansion of such a small business.
(NRS 233B.010-233B.120) Under the Act, such state agencies, officers and employees are required to take certain actions to determine the impact of a proposed regulation on for-profit businesses that employ less than 150 employees before adopting a regulation that is likely to impose a direct and significant economic burden upon such a small business or that directly restricts the formation, operation or expansion of such a small business.
(NRS 233B.0608, 233B.0609) The Act also requires that an agency, before holding an initial public comments from interested persons on one or more general topics to be addressed in the regulation.
(NRS 233B.0608, 233B.0609) The Act also requires that an agency, before holding an initial public hearing on a proposed regulation, conduct at least one workshop to solicit comments from interested persons on one or more general topics to be addressed in the regulation.
(NRS 233B.061) Existing law also establishes procedural requirements for the adoption by a local government of a rule, which is defined in existing law to mean an ordinance and, with certain exceptions, an action taken that imposes, increases or changes the basis for the calculation of a fee that is paid by a for-profit business.
(NRS 233B.061) Existing law also establishes procedural to mean an ordinance and, with certain exceptions, an action taken that imposes, increases oraw changes the basis for the calculation of a fee that is paid by a for-profit business.
(NRS 237.030-237.150) One of the procedural prerequisites for the adoption by a local government of such a rule that is likely to impose a direct and significant economic burden upon a business or directly restricts the formation, operation or expansion of a business is the notification of chambers of commerce inclusion in the business impact statement prepared by the local governmentuires regarding such a proposed rule:
(NRS 237.030-237.150) One of the procedural prerequisites for the adoption by a local government of such a rule that is likely to impose a direct and significant economic burden upon a Assembly Amendment No.
376 to Assembly Bill No.
444 Page 4 business or directly restricts the formation, operation or expansion of a business is the notification of chambers of commerce and trade associations of the proposed rule.
(NRS 237.080) Existing law requires inclusion in the business impact statement prepared by the local government regarding such a proposed rule:
(NRS 237.090) Section 1 of this bill imposes the same prerequisite of notifying chambers of commerce and trade associations on a state agency, officer or employee subject to the Nevada Administrative Procedure Act, in determining the impact of a proposed regulation on small businesses, insofar as is practicable.
(NRS 237.090) Section 1 of this bill imposes the agency, officer or employee subject to the Nevada Administrative Procedure Act, inate determining the impact of a proposed regulation on small businesses, insofar as is practicable.
Show all 109 changed rows (69 more)
Previous
Latest
Section 2 of this bill similarly requires the state agency, officer or employee to include in the small business likely to be affected by the proposed regulation and a list of any chambers ofses commerce and trade associations notified pursuant to section 1.
Section 2 of this bill similarly requires the state agency, officer or employee to include in the small business impact statement for the proposed regulation the total number of small businesses likely to be affected by the proposed regulation and a list of any chambers of commerce and trade associations notified pursuant to section 1.
Section 2.5 of this - 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – bill requires an agency to notify by electronic mail chambers of commerce, trade associations or owners and officers of businesses which are likely be affected by a proposed regulation of the time and place set for a workshop to solicit comments from interested persons on one or more general topics to be addressed in the regulation.
Section 2.5 of this bill requires an agency to notify by electronic mail chambers of commerce, trade associations or owners and officers of businesses which are likely be affected by a proposed regulation of the time and place set for a workshop to solicit comments from interested persons on one or more general topics to be addressed in the regulation.
Section 2.5 also requires an agency to maintain an electronic mailing businesses and to update the list not later than January 31 of each year.icers of Under existing law, a local government is not required to comply with the procedural requirements for adopting a rule if the local government is taking action that imposes, increases or changes the basis for the calculation of an impact fee or sales and use taxes.
Section 2.5 also requires an agency to maintain an electronic mailing list of local chambers of commerce, trade associations and owners and officers of businesses and to update the list not later than January 31 of each year.
(NRS 237.060) Section 3 of this bill eliminates these exemptions, thereby requiring a local government to comply with those procedural requirements with respect to a proposed rule that imposes, increases or changes the basiExisting law further provides that any action of a local government to adopt a proposed rule in violation of the requirements for adopting such a rule is void.
requirements for adopting a rule if the local government is taking action that imposes,l increases or changes the basis for the calculation of an impact fee or sales and use taxes.
(NRS 237.140) Section 4 of this bill clarifies that any such action is also unenforceable.
(NRS 237.060) Section 3 of this bill eliminates [this exemption,] these exemptions, thereby requiring a local government to comply with those procedural requirements with respect to a proposed rule that imposes, increases or changes the basis for the calculation of an impact fee or sales and use taxes.
Section 3 also clarifies that, for purposes of the procedural requirements for adopting a rule, a “rule” is either:
(1) an ordinance by the adoption of which the governing body of a local government exercises legislative powers;
or (2) an action taken by the governing body of a local government that imposes, increases or changes the basis for the calculation of a fee that is paid in whole or in substantial part by businesses.
(See, e.g., Castellanos v.
City of Reno, 629 F.
Supp.
3d 1031, 1042 (D.
Nev.
2022) (construing NRS 237.060 “as disjunctive because the alternative is contrary to common sense and the law’s purpose”)) rule in violation of the requirements for adopting such a rule is void.
(NRS 237.140) Section 4 of this bill [authorizes the Attorney General and certain persons to sue in a court of competent jurisdiction:
(1) to have any action to adopt a proposed rule in violation of the requirements for adopting such a rule declared void;
or (2) for an injunction against the local government to require compliance with or prevent violations of the requirements for adopting such a rule.
Section 4 also prescribes a time period for bringing such an action and authorizes a court to award reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs to the successful plaintiff in such a suit.
Existing law provides identical authority to bring such a lawsuit or seek injunctive relief for violations of the Open Meeting Law.
(NRS 241.037)] clarifies that any such action is also unenforceable.
(NRS 278B.160) Under set a public hearing to consider the land use assumptions and to provide certain to notice of such a public hearing.
(NRS 278B.160) Under existing law, a local government that assumptions and to provide certain notice of such a public hearing.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
Assembly Amendment No.
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
376 to Assembly Bill No.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
444 Page 5 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
- 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – small businesses that are likely to be affected by the proposed of regulation.
(a) Insofar as practicable, consult with owners and officers of small businesses that are likely to be affected by the proposed regulation.
(2) Establishing different standards of compliance for a small busines(3) Modifying a fee or fine set forth in the regulation so that a small business is authorized to pay a lower fee or fine.
(3) Modifying a fee or fine set forth in the regulation so that a small;
and business is authorized to pay a lower fee or fine.
The director, executive head or other person who is responsible for the agency shall sign the statement certifying that, to the best of his or her knowledge or belief, a concerted effort was made to determine the impact of the proposed regulation on small accurate.s and that the information contained in the statement is 4.
The director, executive head or other person who is responsible for the agency shall sign the statement certifying that, to the best of his or her knowledge or belief, a concerted effort was made to determine the impact of the proposed regulation on small businesses and that the information contained in the statement is accurate.
4.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 4 – 233B.0609 1.S 233BA small business impact statement prepared:
Sec.
pursuant to NRS 233B.0608 must set forth the following information:
2.
(a) A description of the manner in which comment was solicited from affected small businesses, a summary of their response and an explanation of the manner in which other interested persons may obtain a copy of the summary.
NRS 233B.0609 is hereby amended to read as follows:
233B.0609 1.
A small business impact statement prepared pursuant to NRS 233B.0608 must set forth the following information:
Assembly Amendment No.
376 to Assembly Bill No.
444 Page 6 (a) A description of the manner in which comment was solicited from affected small businesses, a summary of their response and an explanation of the manner in which other interested persons may obtain a copy of the summary.
[(c)] (e) The estimated economic effect of the proposed regulation on the small businesses which it is to regulate, including, withou(1) Both adverse and beneficial effects;
[(c)] (e) The estimated economic effect of the proposed regulation on the small businesses which it is to regulate, including, without limitation:
(1) Both adverse and beneficial effects;
the impact of a regulation on small businesses.
[(h)] (j) The reasons for the conclusions of the agency regarding the impact of a regulation on small businesses.
the agency regarding 2.
2.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 5 – Sec.
Sec.
subsection 3, an agency shall conduct at least one workshop to solicit comments from interested persons on one or more general topics to be addressed in a proposed regulation, except that a workshop is not required if it is the second or subsequent hearing on the regulation.
2.
Before holding the public hearing required pursuant to subsection 3, an agency shall conduct at least one workshop to solicit comments from interested persons on one or more general topics to be addressed in a proposed regulation, except that a workshop is not required if it is the second or subsequent hearing on the regulation.
With respect to substantive regulations, the agency shall set a time and place for an oral public hearing, but if no one appears who will be directly affected by the proposed regulation and requests an oral hearing, the agency may proceed immediately to act upon any written submissions.
With respect to substantive regulations, the agency shall set a time and place for an oral public hearing, but if no one appears who will be directly affected by the proposed regulation and requests an oral hearing, the agency may proceed Assembly Amendment No.
376 to Assembly Bill No.
444 Page 7 immediately to act upon any written submissions.
pursuant to subsection 3 on the same day that the agency holds the workshop required pursuant to subsection 2.
4.
An agency shall not hold the public hearing required pursuant to subsection 3 on the same day that the agency holds the workshop required pursuant to subsection 2.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 6 – Sec.
Sec.
and government that imposes, increases or changes the basis for the calculation of a fee that is paid in whole or in substantial part by businesses [.] , including, without limitation, an impact fee.
[and] or (b) An action taken by the governing body of a local government that imposes, increases or changes the basis for the calculation of a fee that is paid in whole or in substantial part by businesses [.] , including, without limitation, an impact fee.
body of a local government that authorizes or relates to the issuance of bonds or other evidence of debt of the local government.
(d) An ordinance adopted by or action taken by the governing body of a local government that authorizes or relates to the issuance of bonds or other evidence of debt of the local government.
237.140 Any action of the governing body of a local government to adopt a proposed rule in violation of the provisions of NRS 237.030 to 237.150, inclusive, is void [,] and unenforceable, including, without limitation, if the governing body does not comply with the provisions of subsection 3 of NRS 237.100.
237.140 [1.] Any action of the governing body of a local government to adopt a proposed rule in violation of the provisions of NRS 237.030 to 237.150, inclusive, is void [,] and unenforceable, including, without limitation, if the governing body does not comply with the provisions of subsection 3 of NRS 237.100.
Sec.
[2.
The Attorney General may sue in any court of competent jurisdiction to have an action of the governing body of a local government to adopt a proposed rule in violation of the provisions of NRS 237.030 to 237.150, inclusive, declared void or for an injunction against the governing body to require compliance with or prevent violations of the provisions of NRS 237.030 to 237.150, inclusive.
The injunction may be issued without proof of actual damage or other irreparable harm sustained by any person.
Assembly Amendment No.
376 to Assembly Bill No.
444 Page 8 3.
Any person denied a right conferred by the provisions of NRS 237.030 to 237.150, inclusive, if any, may sue in the district court of the district in which the governing body of a local government is situated.
A suit may seek to have an action of the governing body of a local government to adopt a proposed rule in violation of the provisions of NRS 237.030 to 237.150, inclusive, declared void or to require compliance with or prevent violations of the provisions of NRS 237.030 to 237.150, inclusive.
The court may order payment of reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs to a successful plaintiff in a suit brought under this subsection.
4.
Any suit brought to:
(a) Require compliance with the provisions of NRS 237.030 to 237.150, inclusive, must be commenced within 120 days after the action to which the objection was raised was taken.
(b) Have an action declared void pursuant to subsection 2 or 3 must be commenced within 60 days after the action was taken.] Sec.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 7 – 2.
2.
local government and at least three other separate, prominent placese within the jurisdiction of the local government.
(b) By posting a copy of the notice at the principal office of the local government and at least three other separate, prominent places within the jurisdiction of the local government.
~~~~~ 25 - 83rd Session (2025)