Amendment vs bill Committee Amendment vs Engrossed

Struck = removed from the bill ยท added = the amendment's new text.

Previous
Latest
First Regular Session Seventy-first General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
HB1190_S_AGR.001 SENATE COMMITTEE OF REFERENCE REPORT _______________________________ April 20, 2017 Chairman of Committee Date Committee on Agriculture, Natural Resources, & Energy After consideration on the merits, the Committee recommends the following:
17-0818.01 Jennifer Berman x3286 HOUSE BILL 17-1190 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Becker K., SENATE SPONSORSHIP Sonnenberg, House Committees Senate Committees Agriculture, Livestock, & Natural Resources A BILL FOR AN ACT C ONCERNING THE LIMITED APPLICABILITY OF THE C OLORADO SUPREMECOURT 'SDECISIONIN ST.JUDE S C O.V.R OARING F ORK C LUB , LLC, 351 P.3d 442 (C OLO .
HB17-1190 be amended as follows, and as so amended, be referred to the Committee of the Whole with favorable recommendation:
2015).
Amend reengrossed bill, page 2, line 6, strike "(a)".
Bill Summary (Note:
Page 2, strike lines 10 and 11 and substitute "HTS FOR WHICH A DECREE WAS ENTERED AS OF JULY 15, 2015.
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does e e notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill a 1 passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that S U 2 O g l applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at H d p http://leg.colorado.gov.) e A r In the case of St.
IGHTS WHICH WOULD ".
Jude's Co.
Page 2, line 14, strike "(20)(a)" and substitute "(20)".
v.
Page 2, strike lines 15 through 19 and substitute ".
Roaring Fork Club, LLC, 351 P.3d (Colo.
UCH RIGHTS MAYBEMAINTAINEDTHROUGHFINDINGSOFREASONABLEDILIGENCEAND MADE ABSOLUTE ,AND AUGMENTATION PLANS RELATED TO SUCH RIGHTS MAY BE APPROVED ,IN".
2015) (St.
Strike page 3 and substitute:
Jude's Co.), the Colorado supreme court held that direct diversions of water from a river to a private ditch for aesthetic, g recreational, and piscatorial purposes on private property, without d 7 impoundment,arenotbeneficialusesofwaterunderColoradowaterlaw.
"SECTION 2.
E e 0 U R , O n i Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
Act subject to petition - effective date.
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
This act takes effect at 12:01 a.m.
H d p Capital letters indicate new material to be added to existing statute.
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiodafterfinaladjournmentofthegeneralassembly(August 9, 2017, if adjournment sine die is on May 10, 2017);
d A Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute.
except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in November 2018 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.".
e m A The bill provides that the decision in the St.
** *** ** *** ** *HB1190_S_AGR.001*
Jude's Co.
case interpreting section 37-92-103 (4) does not apply to previously decreed absolute and conditional water rights or claims pending as of July 15, 2015.Theinterpretationofsection37-92-103(4)inSt.Jude'sCo.applies only to direct flow appropriations, without storage, made after July 15, 2015, for water diverted from a surface stream to a private ditch on private property for aesthetic, recreational, and piscatorial purposes.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
SECTION1.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,37-92-305,add(20) as follows:
37-92-305.
Standardswithrespecttorulingsoftherefereeand decisions of the water judge - definitions.
(20) Limited applicability of St.
Jude's Co.
case - legislative declaration.
(a) TIONS IN THE COLORADOSUPREMECOURT 'SDECISIONINST.JUDES CO.V.ROARING FORK C LUB, LLC, 351 P.3d 442 OLO.
2015),INTERPRETING SECTION 37-92-103(4),DO NOT APPLY TO ABSOLUTE AND CONDITIONAL WATER RIGHTS FOR WHICH A DECREE WAS ENTERED ,OR FOR WHICH A WATER COURT CLAIMWASPENDING ,ASOF JULY15,2015.R IGHTSWHICHWOULD BE SUBJECT TO THEC OLORADO SUPREME COURT 'S INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 37-92-103 (4)IN THE ST.
JUDE'S CO.
CASE BUT FOR THIS SUBSECTION (20)(a)ARE VALID AND SHALL BE GIVEN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT, AND ANY SUCH PENDING CLAIMS MAY BE ADJUDICATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OTHERWISE APPLICABLE COLORADO LAW .
SUCH RIGHTS AND CLAIMS MAY BE MAINTAINED THROUGH FINDINGS OF REASONABLE DILIGENCE AND MADE ABSOLUTE ,AND AUGMENTATION PLANS RELATED TO SUCH RIGHTS AND CLAIMS MAY BE APPROVED ,IN ACCORDANCEWITH COLORADOLAW .CHANGES OFSUCHRIGHTSMUSTBE LIMITED TO CHANGES IN POINTS OF DIVERSION MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTI.N -2- 1190 (b) THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY HEREBY FINDS ,DETERMINES, AND DECLARES THAT THE INTERPRETATION OF SECTION37-92-103 (4IN THE ST.
UDE S CO.
DECISION APPLIES ONLY TO CLAIMS FOR DIRECFLOW APPROPRIATIONS,WITHOUT STORAGE , FILED AFTERULY 15, 2015,FOR WATER DIVERTED FROM A SURFACE STREAM OR TRIBUTARY GROUNDWATER BY A PRIVATE ENTITY FOR PRIVATE AESTHETIC , RECREATIONAL ,AND PISCATORIAL PURPOSE.
(c) NOTHINGINTHISSUBSECTION (20)ISINTENDED,NORSHALLBE INTERPRETED, AS CREATING ANY NEW TYPE OF WATER RIGHTS OR BENEFICIAL USES FOR PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ENTITIES UNDECOLORADO LAW .
(d) NOTHINGINTHISSUBSECTION (20)ISINTENDEDTOAFFECTTHE EXISTING STATUTORY AUTHORITY REGARDING THE APPROPRIATION OF INSTREAM FLOW WATER RIGHTS AND RECREATIONAL IN CHANNEL DIVERSION WATER RIGHTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 37-92-102 AND 37-92-103,OR THE APPROPRIATION OF WATER RIGHTS FOR PARKS AND WILDLIFE PURPOSES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 33-1-101, 33-1-105, 33-10-101,AND 33-10-107.
SECTION 2.
Safety clause.
The general assemblyherebyfinds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety.
-3- 1190