Struck = removed from the bill ·
added = the amendment's new text.
SB 15-FN - AS INTRODUCED SESSION 25-0229 09/06 SENATE BILL 15-FN AN ACT relative to establishing a mandatory minimum sentence for the crime of distribution of a controlled drug with death resulting.
SPONSORS:
Sen.
Gannon, Dist 23;
Sen.
Gray, Dist 6;
Sen.
Lang, Dist 2;
Sen.
Birdsell, Dist 19;
Sen.
Avard, Dist 12;
Sen.
Abbas, Dist 22;
Litchfield,Roy, Rock.
32;31 November 12, 2025 2025-3096h 09/05 Amendment to SB 15-FN Amend the title of the bill by replacing it with the following:
Rep.3 AN ACT relative to incorporating hard labor as a sentencing option for capital murder and serious sexual assaults on children, defining hard labor, establishing medical exemptions and penalties for abuse thereof, providing alternative punitive measures for legitimate medical exemptions, and authorizing jury determination of hard labor in qualifying cases.
Khan,9 Rock.Amend the bill by replacing all after the enacting clause with the following:
30;1 New Paragraph;
Rep.Hard Labor for Certain Offenses.
Vose,Amend Rock.RSA 651:2 by inserting after paragraph II-h the following new paragraph:
5;II-i.(a) In any case in which the defendant is convicted of capital murder under RSA 630:1 or aggravated felonious sexual assault on a child under the age of 13 under RSA 632-A:2, I(a), I(b), or I(c), the court shall conduct a separate sentencing hearing before the same jury that determined guilt, unless the defendant waives a jury and elects sentencing by the court.
Rep.(b) At the sentencing hearing, the state and the defendant may present evidence and argument relevant to the imposition of hard labor.
L.The jury shall be instructed that hard labor may be imposed only if it finds beyond a reasonable doubt that:
Walsh,(1) Rock.The defendant’s conduct was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel;
15;or (2) The defendant acted with deliberate cruelty;
Rep.or (3) The offense involved the infliction of serious physical, emotional, or psychological injury on the victim;
Bernardy,and Rock.(4) The aggravating factors substantially outweigh any mitigating factors presented.
36(c) COMMITTEE:A verdict to impose hard labor requires the affirmative vote of at least 9 jurors in a 12-person jury.
JudiciaryIf ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────fewer ANALYSISthan This9 billjurors setsvote ato mandatoryimpose minimumhard sentencelabor, for the crimesentence ofshall distributionbe oflife aimprisonment controlledwithout drugparole. with death resulting.
-(d) -If -hard -labor -is -imposed, -the -sentence -shall -be -life -imprisonment -at -hard -labor -without -parole, -to -be -served -as -defined -in -RSA -622:7. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Explanation:
MatterThe addeddefendant shall perform hard labor for the duration of their natural life, subject only to currentmedical lawexemptions appearsunder inRSA bold622:7-a italics.or suspension under RSA 622:7, III.
Matter(e) removedThe fromcourt currentshall lawenter appearsthe [insentence bracketsin andaccordance struckthrough.]with Matterthe whichjury’s isverdict. either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
SBThere 15-FNshall -be ASno INTRODUCEDjudicial 25-0229departure 09/06from STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty Five AN ACT relative to establishing a mandatoryjury minimumverdict sentenceimposing foror therejecting crimehard oflabor. distribution of a controlled drug with death resulting.
BeAmendment itto EnactedSB by15-FN the- SenatePage and2 House- of2 RepresentativesDuties inof Generalthe CourtCommissioner. convened:
1Amend ControlledRSA Drug622:7, Act;IX to read as follows:
Penalties.
Amend RSA 318-B:26, IX to read as follows:
AnyTo person[conduct whoand manufactures,manage sells,the orindustries dispensesat methamphetamine,the lysergicprisons.] acid,establish diethylamideand phencyclidineoperate (PCP)an orindustries anyprogram otherto controlledaid drug classified in schedulesthe Irehabilitation orof II,inmates or any controlled drug analog thereof, in violation of RSAthe 318-B:2,state Iprisons, or I-a, is strictly liable for a death which results from the injection, inhalation or ingestion of that substance, and [may] shall beinclude sentenceda tohard notlabor lesscomponent than 10 years of imprisonment up to [for] life imprisonment [or for suchsentences termdesignated asunder theRSA court651:2, mayII-i. order].
For(a) purposesAs ofused in this section,paragraph, “hard labor” means the person'smandatory actperformance of manufacturing,physically dispensing,intensive ormanual sellinglabor atasks substanceassigned isby the causecommissioner of acorrections, deathdesigned when:to serve as punishment, deterrence, and, where appropriate, rehabilitation for offenders sentenced under RSA 651:2, II-i.
(a)Such Thelabor injection,shall inhalationinclude, but not be limited to, activities such as agricultural fieldwork, construction or ingestioninfrastructure ofmaintenance, thesanitation substanceand iswaste anmanagement, antecedentmanufacturing butor forassembly whichwork therequiring deathsignificant wouldphysical notexertion, haveor occurred;other comparable tasks that demand prolonged physical effort under supervised conditions.
andNo (b)hard Thelabor deathassignment wasshall not:pose an unreasonable risk of serious injury or be conducted without regard to the offender’s health and safety.
(1)(b) TooHard remotelabor assignments shall require no less than 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, unless adjusted for documented medical, age-related, or security reasons, and shall be performed in itscompliance occurrencewith asbasic tohealth haveand justsafety bearingstandards onto theprevent person'sinjury liability;or undue hardship.
orThe (2)commissioner Tooshall dependenthave uponthe conductfinal ofauthority anotherto persondetermine whichthe wasspecific unrelatedtasks to be accomplished, the injection,conditions inhalationunder orwhich ingestionthey ofwill thebe substanceperformed, orand itswhether effect,hard aslabor towill haveoccur aon justany bearinggiven day based on the person'scommissioner’s liability.determination that it is safe for the public, staff, and offenders.
ItThis shalldetermination notmay beinclude aconsiderations defensesuch toas astaffing prosecutionlevels, underequipment thisavailability, sectionweather thatconditions, the decedent contributed to his own death by his purposeful, knowing, reckless or negligentany injection,other inhalationfactors oraffecting ingestionsafety. of the substance or by his consenting to the administration of the substance by another.
NothingIf inthe thiscommissioner sectiondetermines shallthat bethere construedis insufficient staffing to precludesafely orsupervise limitinmates anyin prosecutionhard labor, the commissioner may suspend hard labor for homicide.any or all affected inmates, and alternative punitive measures shall be implemented in accordance with RSA 622:7-d.
ACompensation, convictionif arisingany, under this section shall notbe mergeat withthe aprevailing convictionprison ofwage onerate asbut ashall drugnot enterpriseexceed leaderrates or for anynon-hard otherlabor offenseassignments. defined in this chapter.
2The Effectivecommissioner Date.may incorporate rehabilitative components, such as vocational training, but the primary purpose for designated offenses shall be punitive retribution and societal deterrence.
ThisRefusal actto shallparticipate takewithout effectvalid Januaryexemption 1,may 2026.result in disciplinary measures, including loss of good time credits under RSA 651-A:22 or extended confinement.
LBA(c) 25-0229The 12/3/24commissioner SBshall 15-FN-ensure FISCALthat NOTEall ASstaff INTRODUCEDinvolved ANin ACTassigning relativeor tosupervising establishinghard alabor mandatoryreceive minimumtraining sentenceon forcompliance with the crimeEighth ofAmendment distributionto the United States Constitution and part I, article 18 of athe controlledNew drugHampshire withconstitution deathto resulting.prevent cruel and unusual punishment.
FISCAL3 IMPACT:New Sections;
EstimatedMedical StateExemption Impactfrom FYHard 2025Labor FYand 2026Prevention FY 2027 FY 2028 Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue Fund None Expenditures* Indeterminable Funding Source General Fund Appropriations* $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source None *Expenditure = Cost of billAbuse. *Appropriation = Authorized funding to cover cost of bill Estimated Political Subdivision Impact FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 County Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 County Expenditures Indeterminable Local Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 Local Expenditures Indeterminable METHODOLOGY:
ThisAmend billRSA adds,622 deletes,by orinserting modifiesafter asection criminal7-b penalty,the orfollowing changesnew statutesections: to which there is a penalty for violation.
Therefore,622:7-c thisMedical billExemptions mayfrom haveHard anLabor; impact on the judicial and correctional systems, which could affect prosecution, incarceration, probation, and parole costs, for the state, as well as county and local governments.
APrevention summary of suchAbuse. costs can be found at:
https://gencourt.state.nh.us/lba/Budget/Fiscal_Notes/JudicialCorrectionalCosts.pdfAmendment AGENCIESto CONTACTED:SB 15-FN - Page 3 - I.
JudicialAn Branch,offender Judicialmay Council,be Departmentexempted offrom Justice,hard Departmentlabor only upon a determination of Corrections,medical Newinability Hampshireby Associationa ofqualified Counties,physician andemployed Newby Hampshireor Municipalcontracted Associationwith the department of corrections.
“Medical inability” means a documented physical or mental condition that substantially impairs the offender’s capacity to perform the essential functions of assigned hard labor tasks, even with reasonable accommodations, as certified in writing with reference to specific diagnostic criteria, such as based on standards from the American Medical Association or equivalent.
II.
The determination shall be based on an in-person evaluation, including review of medical records, and may incorporate standardized assessments for malingering, such as the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) or similar validated tools.
III.
If the initial evaluation supports an exemption, a second opinion from an independent physician or medical review board appointed by the commissioner may be required at the discretion of the department or upon challenge by correctional staff.
IV.
Exemptions shall be reviewed at least every 6 months, or sooner if the offender’s condition improves or new evidence suggests abuse.
Failure to cooperate with evaluations may result in revocation of the exemption and disciplinary action.
V.
An offender who knowingly submits a false or exaggerated claim of medical inability, or who malingers to avoid hard labor, commits a disciplinary offense punishable by:
(a) Loss of good time credits (up to 90 days per incident) under RSA 651-A:22;
(b) Extension of the minimum sentence by up to 6 months for repeated offenses;
(c) Confinement in restrictive housing;
or (d) Other sanctions as determined by department policy, consistent with due process.
VI.
The department shall maintain records of all exemption requests, determinations, and reviews, and submit an annual report to the legislature on exemption rates, patterns, and any detected instances of abuse, including recommendations for improvements.
622:7-d Alternative Punitive Measures for Medical Exemptions.
I.
If an offender sentenced to hard labor under RSA 651:2, II(i) receives a legitimate medical exemption under RSA 622:7-a or if hard labor is suspended due to insufficient staffing under RSA 622:7, III, the commissioner shall impose alternative punitive measures to ensure the sentence maintains a retributive component, including but not limited to:
(a) Placement in a restrictive housing unit (RHU) or special housing unit (SHU), involving up to 23 hours per day of isolation with minimal privileges, subject to periodic reviews every 6 months;
(b) Suspension or denial of privileges, including but not limited to non-contact visits only, limited telephone access, no recreation time beyond basic exercise, no canteen purchases except essentials, and no entertainment electronics;
(c) Automatic loss of good conduct credits under RSA 651-A:22 or earned time credits under RSA 651-A:22-a, up to the maximum allowable, to extend the effective term of confinement;
Amendment to SB 15-FN - Page 4 - (d) Higher security classification, such as C-4 or C-5, with enhanced supervision, reduced yard time, and limited property;
(e) Mandatory participation in non-physical burdensome requirements, such as victim- impact programs, administrative duties if feasible, or restitution deductions from inmate funds.
II.
These measures shall be tailored to the severity of the offense and the offender’s classification, ensuring compliance with constitutional standards, and shall prioritize retribution and deterrence in lieu of hard labor.
4 Severability.
If any provision of this act or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the act which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this act are declared to be severable.
5 Effective Date.
This act shall take effect 6 months after its passage.
Amendment to SB 15-FN - Page 5 - 2025-3096h AMENDED ANALYSIS This bill incorporates hard labor as a sentencing option for certain offenses;
establishes medical exemptions and penalties for abuse thereof;
provides alternative punitive measures for legitimate medical exemptions;
and establishes a sentencing appeals panel for prosecution appeals related to hard labor sentences.