Comparing SJR 8 → HR 8433 — Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of...

Struck = only in SJR 8 · added = only in HR 8433.

Previous
Latest
Bill Text - SJR-8 The Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929.
[Congressional Bills 117th Congress] [From the U.S.
skip to content home accessibility FAQ feedback sitemap login x Quick Search:
Government Publishing Office] [H.R.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | Version:
8433 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 117th CONGRESS 2d Session H.
08/18/26 - Chaptered 08/14/26 - Enrolled 06/16/25 - Introduced SJR-8 The Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929.(2025-2026) Text >> Votes >> History >> Bill Analysis >> Today's Law As Amended >> Compare Versions >> Status >> Comments To Author >> Track Bill >> Add To My Favorites >> SHARE THIS:
R.
SJR8:v97#DOCUMENTBill Start Senate Joint Resolution No.
8433 To amend section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to render available to certain long-term residents of the United States the benefit under that section.
8 CHAPTER 183 Relative to immigration.
_______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 20, 2022 Ms.
[ Filed with Secretary of State  August 18, 2026.
Lofgren (for herself, Mrs.
] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSJR 8, Arreguín.
Torres of California, Ms.
The Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929.This measure would support the Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929.Digest Key Fiscal Committee:
Meng, Mr.
NO  Bill TextWHEREAS, The United States of America is a nation founded on the principles that all people are created equal and the promise of freedom for all;
Correa, Mr.
andWHEREAS, Our strength as a country has always been greater when we welcome newcomers;
Espaillat, Mr.
andWHEREAS, California has the highest number of migrants in the country;
Garcia of Illinois, Mr.
andWHEREAS, It has been nearly 40 years since the federal government passed an immigration reform bill, and our current immigration system is unable to meet the needs of the present day;
Nadler, Ms.
andWHEREAS, California is home to nearly 10,000,000 immigrants, the majority of whom have lived in the United States for more than 10 years;
Barragan, Ms.
andWHEREAS, Undocumented immigrants contribute significantly to California’s economy;
Bass, Mr.
andWHEREAS, One in 10 workers in California is an undocumented immigrant, and undocumented immigrants contribute $51.4 billion dollars in state and local taxes;
Blumenauer, Mr.
andWHEREAS, California would directly benefit from Congress updating immigration law because it has been shown that providing citizenship for undocumented immigrants boosts the economy and increases the job market;
Bowman, Mr.
andWHEREAS, In 2023, California congressional leaders introduced the Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929 (Registry bills) that allows undocumented people living continuously in the United States for at least seven years to apply for legal permanent residency, and it is estimated that approximately 8,000,000 undocumented people may benefit from the passage of that bill;
Cardenas, Mr.
andWHEREAS, Eighty percent of Californians believe there should be a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants;
Castro of Texas, Mrs.
andWHEREAS, Immigrant communities continue to organize around passing immigration reform, and this month, the Northern California Coalition for Just Immigration Reform completed a three-day walk from the City of Vacaville to the City of Sacramento in support of the Registry bills;
Cherfilus-McCormick, Ms.
andWHEREAS, Passing immigration reform that recognizes the contributions and humanity of immigrants is in line with our values as a state and as a country;
Chu, Ms.
now, therefore, be itResolved by the Senate and the Assembly of the State of California, jointly, That a workable, humane, and just approach to solving our nation’s broken immigration system would benefit California and the United States as whole, and therefore, the Registry bills should be supported;
Clarke of New York, Ms.
and be it furtherResolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.
Escobar, Ms.
Garcia of Texas, Mr.
Gomez, Ms.
Jayapal, Mr.
Johnson of Georgia, Mr.
Krishnamoorthi, Ms.
Lee of California, Mr.
Lieu, Mr.
Lowenthal, Mrs.
Carolyn B.
Maloney of New York, Mr.
McGovern, Ms.
Moore of Wisconsin, Mrs.
Napolitano, Ms.
Norton, Ms.
Ocasio-Cortez, Ms.
Omar, Mr.
Panetta, Ms.
Show all 70 changed rows (30 more)
Previous
Latest
Pingree, Mr.
Quigley, Ms.
Ross, Ms.
Roybal- Allard, Mr.
Ruiz, Ms.
Sanchez, Ms.
Schakowsky, Mr.
Smith of Washington, Mr.
Soto, Ms.
Tlaib, Ms.
Velazquez, Mrs.
Watson Coleman, Ms.
Wilson of Florida, Mr.
Grijalva, Ms.
Castor of Florida, and Mr.
McNerney) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to render available to certain long-term residents of the United States the benefit under that section.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1.
SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929''.
SEC.
2.
REGISTRY.
(a) In General.--Section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1259) is amended-- (1) in the section header, by striking ``entered the united states prior to july 1, 1924 or january 1, 1972'';
and inserting ``are long-term residents of the united states'';
and (2) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
``(a) entered the United States at least 7 years before the application date;''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take effect 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
<all>