Comparing AJR 17 → S 2468 — Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of ...

Struck = only in AJR 17 · added = only in S 2468.

Previous
Latest
20250AJR_001796CHP 96 INTRODUCED 2025-06-24 AMENDED_SENATE 2026-06-25 PASSED_ASSEMBLY 2026-08-17 PASSED_SENATE 2026-08-13 ENROLLED 2026-08-19 CHAPTERED 2026-08-25 FILED 2026-08-25 2025 0 AJR 17 CHP 2026 CHR 0 210 Introduced by Assembly Member Celeste Rodriguez (Principal coauthor:
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S.
Senator Arreguín) (Coauthors:
Government Publishing Office] [S.
Assembly Members Harabedian, Kalra, Pacheco, Soria, and Zbur) LEAD_AUTHOR ASSEMBLY Celeste Rodriguez PRINCIPAL_COAUTHOR SENATE Arreguín COAUTHOR ASSEMBLY Harabedian COAUTHOR ASSEMBLY Kalra COAUTHOR ASSEMBLY Pacheco COAUTHOR ASSEMBLY Soria COAUTHOR ASSEMBLY Zbur Relative to immigration.
2468 Introduced in Senate (IS)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S.
immigration The Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929.
2468 To amend section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to render available to certain long-term residents of the United States the benefit under that section.
This measure would support the Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929.
_______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES July 28, 2025 Mr.
NO WHEREAS, The United States of America is a nation founded on the principles that all people are created equal and the promise of freedom for all;
Padilla (for himself, Mr.
and WHEREAS, Our strength as a country has always been greater when we welcome newcomers;
Durbin, Mr.
and WHEREAS, California has the highest number of migrants in the country;
Schatz, Mrs.
and WHEREAS, It has been nearly 40 years since the federal government passed an immigration reform bill, and our current immigration system is unable to meet the needs of the present day;
Murray, Mr.
and WHEREAS, California is home to more than 10,900,000 immigrants, the majority of whom have lived in the United States for more than 10 years;
Murphy, Mr.
and WHEREAS, Undocumented immigrants contribute significantly to California’s economy;
Sanders, Ms.
and WHEREAS, One in 10 workers in California is an undocumented immigrant, and undocumented immigrants contribute $51,400,000,000 dollars in state and local taxes;
Warren, Mr.
and WHEREAS, California would directly benefit from Congress updating immigration law because it has been shown that providing citizenship for undocumented immigrants boosts the economy and increases the job market;
Markey, Ms.
and WHEREAS, In 2023, California congressional leaders introduced the Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929 (Registry bills) that allows undocumented people living continuously in the United States for at least seven years to apply for legal permanent residency, and it is estimated that approximately 8,000,000 undocumented people may benefit from the passage of that bill;
Duckworth, Mr.
and WHEREAS, Eighty percent of Californians believe there should be a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants;
Booker, Mr.
and WHEREAS, Immigrant communities continue to organize around passing immigration reform, and in June of 2025, the Northern California Coalition for Just Immigration Reform completed a three-day walk from the City of Vacaville to the City of Sacramento in support of the Registry bills H.R.
Lujan, and Mr.
No.
Schiff) introduced the following bill;
4696 (Lofgren) and Sen.
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to render available to certain long-term residents of the United States the benefit under that section.
No.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1.
2468 (Padilla);
SHORT TITLE.
and WHEREAS, Passing immigration reform that recognizes the contributions and humanity of immigrants is in line with our values as a state and as a country;
This Act may be cited as the ``Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929''.
now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of California, jointly, That a workable, humane, and just approach to solving our nation’s broken immigration system would benefit California and the United States as a whole, and therefore, the Registry bills should be supported;
SEC.
and be it further Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.
2.
REGISTRY.
(a) In General.--Section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1259) is amended-- (1) in the section header, by striking ``entered the united states prior to july 1, 1924 or january 1, 1972'';
and inserting ``are long-term residents of the united states'';
and (2) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
``(a) entered the United States at least 7 years before the application date;''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take effect 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
<all>