→
Previous
Latest
SESSION INTRODUCED 22103784D I SENATE BILL NO.
SESSION SENATE SUBSTITUTE 22105096D SENATE BILL NO.
255 Offered January 12, 2022 N Prefiled January 11, 2022 T A Bcommunications infrastructure;
SB 255 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Senate Committee on Local Government on January 24, 2022) (Patron Prior to Substitute––Senator Bell) A BILL to amend and reenact § 15.2-2316.4:2 of the Code of Virginia, relating to zoning;
application process.e of Virginia, relating to zoning;
wireless Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:.
wireleRs –––––––––– Patron––Bell O –––––––––– D Referred to Committee on Local Government –––––––––– U Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1.
C 1.
§ 15.2-2316.4:2.
Application reviews.
In its receiving, consideration, and processing of a complete application submitted underE subsection A of § 15.2-2316.4:1 or for any zoning approval required for a standard process project, a locality shall not:
In its receiving, consideration, and processing of a complete application submitted under subsection A of § 15.2-2316.4:1 or for any zoning approval required for a standard process project, a loc1.
1.
a.
S a.
b.
E b.
or 2.
or N c.
Require an applicant to provide proprietary, confidential, or other business information to justify the need for the project, including propagation maps and telecommunications traffic studies, orB information reviewed by a federal agency as part of the approval process for the same structure and wireless facility, provided that a locality may require an applicant to provide a copy of any approval granted by a federal agency, including conditions imposed by that agency;
The wireless facility technology selected by the applicant for use at the project;
3.
the need for the project, including propagation maps and telecommunications traffic studies, orAo justify information reviewed by a federal agency as part of the approval process for the same structureTand wireless facility, provided that a locality may require an applicant to provide a copy of any approval granted by a federal agency, including conditions imposed by that agency;
E 3.
A locality may adopt reasonable rules with respect to the removal of abandoned wireless support structures or wireless facilities;
A locality may adopt reasonable rules with respect to the rem4.
of financial surety, to ensure that abandoned or unused wireless facilities can be removed, unless thepes locality imposes similar requirements on other permits for other types of similar commercial development.
Impose surety requirements, including bonds, escrow deposits, letters of credit, or any other types of financial surety, to ensure that abandoned or unused wireless facilities can be removed, unless the locality imposes similar requirements on other permits for other types of similar commercial U development.
Any such instrument shall not exceed a reasonable estimate of the direct cost of the removal of the wireless facilities;
Any such instrument shall not exceed a reasonable estimate of the direct cost of tBe removal of the wireless facilities;
35 5.
locality, of any property, structure, base station, or wireless support structure, when promulgating rules or procedures for siting wireless facilities or for evaluating applications;
Discriminate or create a preference on the basis of the ownership, including ownership by the 36 locality, of any property, structure, base station, or wireless support structure, when promulgating rules 37 or procedures for siting wireless facilities or for evaluating applications;
T 36 6.
38 6.
Impose any unreasonable requirements or obligations regarding the presentation or appearance of a 37 project, including unreasonable requirements relating to (i) the kinds of materials used or (ii) the 38 arranging, screening, or landscaping of wireless facilities or wireless structures;
Impose any unreasonable requirements or obligations regarding the presentation or appearance of a arranging, screening, or landscaping of wireless facilities or wireless structures;
T 39 7.
used or (ii) the 7.
Impose any requirement that an applicant purchase, subscribe to, use, or employ facilitieU, which a locality has a competitive, economic, financial, governance, or other interest;or by any entity in 8.
Impose any requirement that an applicant purchase, subscribe to, use, or employ facilities, networks, or services owned, provided, or operated by a locality, in whole or in part, or by any entity in which a locality has a competitive, economic, financial, governance, or other interest;
Condition or require the approval of an application solely on the basis of the applicant's agreement to allow any wireless facilities provided or operated, in whole or in part, by a locality or byEany other entity, to be placed at or co-located with the applicant's project;
8.
Condition or require the approval of an application solely on the basis of the applicant's agreement to allow any wireless facilities provided or operated, in whole or in part, by a locality or by any other entity, to be placed at or co-located with the applicant's project;
12.
S 12.
Disapprove an application if the proposed new structure provides additional wireless coverage or capacity for first responders;
Subject to subsections B and D, disapprove an application submitted on or after July 1, 2022, if the13.
or 13.
Subject to subsections B and D, disapprove an application submitted on or after July 1, 2022, if the proposed wireless support structure is not within a four-mile radius of an existing wireless support structure.
Disapprove an application if the proposed tower is not within a four-mile radius of an existing towB.
The provisions of subdivisions 12 and 13 shall expire on July 1, 2024.
Nothing in this article shall prohibit a locality from disapproving an application submitted under SB255 2 of 2 subsection A of § 15.2-2316.4:1 or for any zoning approval required for a standard process project:
B.
1.
Nothing in this article shall prohibit a locality from disapproving an application submitted under subsection A of § 15.2-2316.4:1 or for any zoning approval required for a standard process project:
On the basis of the fact that the proposed height of any wireless support structure, wireless facility, or wireless support structure with attached wireless facilities exceeds 50 200 feet above ground level, provided that the locality follows a local ordinance or regulation that does not unreasonably discriminate between the applicant and other wireless services providers, wireless infrastructure providers, providers of telecommunications services, and other providers of functionally equivalent services;
SB255S1 2 of 2 1.
On the basis of the fact that the proposed height of any wireless support structure, wireless facility, or wireless support structure with attached wireless facilities exceeds 50 150 feet above ground level, provided that the locality follows a local ordinance or regulation that does not unreasonably discriminate between the applicant and other wireless services providers, wireless infrastructure providers, providers of telecommunications services, and other providers of functionally equivalent services;
⬇ Download PDF